Cargando…

Validation of multiparametric MRI based prediction model in identification of pseudoprogression in glioblastomas

BACKGROUND: Accurate differentiation of pseudoprogression (PsP) from tumor progression (TP) in glioblastomas (GBMs) is essential for appropriate clinical management and prognostication of these patients. In the present study, we sought to validate the findings of our previously developed multiparame...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Godoy, Laiz Laura, Mohan, Suyash, Wang, Sumei, Nasrallah, MacLean P., Sakai, Yu, O’Rourke, Donald M., Bagley, Stephen, Desai, Arati, Loevner, Laurie A., Poptani, Harish, Chawla, Sanjeev
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10142504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37118754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-03941-x
_version_ 1785033628999221248
author de Godoy, Laiz Laura
Mohan, Suyash
Wang, Sumei
Nasrallah, MacLean P.
Sakai, Yu
O’Rourke, Donald M.
Bagley, Stephen
Desai, Arati
Loevner, Laurie A.
Poptani, Harish
Chawla, Sanjeev
author_facet de Godoy, Laiz Laura
Mohan, Suyash
Wang, Sumei
Nasrallah, MacLean P.
Sakai, Yu
O’Rourke, Donald M.
Bagley, Stephen
Desai, Arati
Loevner, Laurie A.
Poptani, Harish
Chawla, Sanjeev
author_sort de Godoy, Laiz Laura
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accurate differentiation of pseudoprogression (PsP) from tumor progression (TP) in glioblastomas (GBMs) is essential for appropriate clinical management and prognostication of these patients. In the present study, we sought to validate the findings of our previously developed multiparametric MRI model in a new cohort of GBM patients treated with standard therapy in identifying PsP cases. METHODS: Fifty-six GBM patients demonstrating enhancing lesions within 6 months after completion of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) underwent anatomical imaging, diffusion and perfusion MRI on a 3 T magnet. Subsequently, patients were classified as TP + mixed tumor (n = 37) and PsP (n = 19). When tumor specimens were available from repeat surgery, histopathologic findings were used to identify TP + mixed tumor (> 25% malignant features; n = 34) or PsP (< 25% malignant features; n = 16). In case of non-availability of tumor specimens, ≥ 2 consecutive conventional MRIs using mRANO criteria were used to determine TP + mixed tumor (n = 3) or PsP (n = 3). The multiparametric MRI-based prediction model consisted of predictive probabilities (PP) of tumor progression computed from diffusion and perfusion MRI derived parameters from contrast enhancing regions. In the next step, PP values were used to characterize each lesion as PsP or TP+ mixed tumor. The lesions were considered as PsP if the PP value was < 50% and TP+ mixed tumor if the PP value was ≥ 50%. Pearson test was used to determine the concordance correlation coefficient between PP values and histopathology/mRANO criteria. The area under ROC curve (AUC) was used as a quantitative measure for assessing the discriminatory accuracy of the prediction model in identifying PsP and TP+ mixed tumor. RESULTS: Multiparametric MRI model correctly predicted PsP in 95% (18/19) and TP+ mixed tumor in 57% of cases (21/37) with an overall concordance rate of 70% (39/56) with final diagnosis as determined by histopathology/mRANO criteria. There was a significant concordant correlation coefficient between PP values and histopathology/mRANO criteria (r = 0.56; p < 0.001). The ROC analyses revealed an accuracy of 75.7% in distinguishing PsP from TP+ mixed tumor. Leave-one-out cross-validation test revealed that 73.2% of cases were correctly classified as PsP and TP + mixed tumor. CONCLUSIONS: Our multiparametric MRI based prediction model may be helpful in identifying PsP in GBM patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10142504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101425042023-04-29 Validation of multiparametric MRI based prediction model in identification of pseudoprogression in glioblastomas de Godoy, Laiz Laura Mohan, Suyash Wang, Sumei Nasrallah, MacLean P. Sakai, Yu O’Rourke, Donald M. Bagley, Stephen Desai, Arati Loevner, Laurie A. Poptani, Harish Chawla, Sanjeev J Transl Med Research BACKGROUND: Accurate differentiation of pseudoprogression (PsP) from tumor progression (TP) in glioblastomas (GBMs) is essential for appropriate clinical management and prognostication of these patients. In the present study, we sought to validate the findings of our previously developed multiparametric MRI model in a new cohort of GBM patients treated with standard therapy in identifying PsP cases. METHODS: Fifty-six GBM patients demonstrating enhancing lesions within 6 months after completion of concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) underwent anatomical imaging, diffusion and perfusion MRI on a 3 T magnet. Subsequently, patients were classified as TP + mixed tumor (n = 37) and PsP (n = 19). When tumor specimens were available from repeat surgery, histopathologic findings were used to identify TP + mixed tumor (> 25% malignant features; n = 34) or PsP (< 25% malignant features; n = 16). In case of non-availability of tumor specimens, ≥ 2 consecutive conventional MRIs using mRANO criteria were used to determine TP + mixed tumor (n = 3) or PsP (n = 3). The multiparametric MRI-based prediction model consisted of predictive probabilities (PP) of tumor progression computed from diffusion and perfusion MRI derived parameters from contrast enhancing regions. In the next step, PP values were used to characterize each lesion as PsP or TP+ mixed tumor. The lesions were considered as PsP if the PP value was < 50% and TP+ mixed tumor if the PP value was ≥ 50%. Pearson test was used to determine the concordance correlation coefficient between PP values and histopathology/mRANO criteria. The area under ROC curve (AUC) was used as a quantitative measure for assessing the discriminatory accuracy of the prediction model in identifying PsP and TP+ mixed tumor. RESULTS: Multiparametric MRI model correctly predicted PsP in 95% (18/19) and TP+ mixed tumor in 57% of cases (21/37) with an overall concordance rate of 70% (39/56) with final diagnosis as determined by histopathology/mRANO criteria. There was a significant concordant correlation coefficient between PP values and histopathology/mRANO criteria (r = 0.56; p < 0.001). The ROC analyses revealed an accuracy of 75.7% in distinguishing PsP from TP+ mixed tumor. Leave-one-out cross-validation test revealed that 73.2% of cases were correctly classified as PsP and TP + mixed tumor. CONCLUSIONS: Our multiparametric MRI based prediction model may be helpful in identifying PsP in GBM patients. BioMed Central 2023-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10142504/ /pubmed/37118754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-03941-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
de Godoy, Laiz Laura
Mohan, Suyash
Wang, Sumei
Nasrallah, MacLean P.
Sakai, Yu
O’Rourke, Donald M.
Bagley, Stephen
Desai, Arati
Loevner, Laurie A.
Poptani, Harish
Chawla, Sanjeev
Validation of multiparametric MRI based prediction model in identification of pseudoprogression in glioblastomas
title Validation of multiparametric MRI based prediction model in identification of pseudoprogression in glioblastomas
title_full Validation of multiparametric MRI based prediction model in identification of pseudoprogression in glioblastomas
title_fullStr Validation of multiparametric MRI based prediction model in identification of pseudoprogression in glioblastomas
title_full_unstemmed Validation of multiparametric MRI based prediction model in identification of pseudoprogression in glioblastomas
title_short Validation of multiparametric MRI based prediction model in identification of pseudoprogression in glioblastomas
title_sort validation of multiparametric mri based prediction model in identification of pseudoprogression in glioblastomas
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10142504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37118754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-023-03941-x
work_keys_str_mv AT degodoylaizlaura validationofmultiparametricmribasedpredictionmodelinidentificationofpseudoprogressioninglioblastomas
AT mohansuyash validationofmultiparametricmribasedpredictionmodelinidentificationofpseudoprogressioninglioblastomas
AT wangsumei validationofmultiparametricmribasedpredictionmodelinidentificationofpseudoprogressioninglioblastomas
AT nasrallahmacleanp validationofmultiparametricmribasedpredictionmodelinidentificationofpseudoprogressioninglioblastomas
AT sakaiyu validationofmultiparametricmribasedpredictionmodelinidentificationofpseudoprogressioninglioblastomas
AT orourkedonaldm validationofmultiparametricmribasedpredictionmodelinidentificationofpseudoprogressioninglioblastomas
AT bagleystephen validationofmultiparametricmribasedpredictionmodelinidentificationofpseudoprogressioninglioblastomas
AT desaiarati validationofmultiparametricmribasedpredictionmodelinidentificationofpseudoprogressioninglioblastomas
AT loevnerlauriea validationofmultiparametricmribasedpredictionmodelinidentificationofpseudoprogressioninglioblastomas
AT poptaniharish validationofmultiparametricmribasedpredictionmodelinidentificationofpseudoprogressioninglioblastomas
AT chawlasanjeev validationofmultiparametricmribasedpredictionmodelinidentificationofpseudoprogressioninglioblastomas