Cargando…

Comparison of Illumination Methods for Flow-Through Optofluidic Biosensors

Optofluidic biosensors have become an important medical diagnostic tool because they allow for rapid, high-sensitivity testing of small samples compared to standard lab testing. For these devices, the practicality of use in a medical setting depends heavily on both the sensitivity of the device and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamblin, Matthew, Wright, Joel, Schmidt, Holger, Hawkins, Aaron R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10142587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37420956
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi14040723
_version_ 1785033648720838656
author Hamblin, Matthew
Wright, Joel
Schmidt, Holger
Hawkins, Aaron R.
author_facet Hamblin, Matthew
Wright, Joel
Schmidt, Holger
Hawkins, Aaron R.
author_sort Hamblin, Matthew
collection PubMed
description Optofluidic biosensors have become an important medical diagnostic tool because they allow for rapid, high-sensitivity testing of small samples compared to standard lab testing. For these devices, the practicality of use in a medical setting depends heavily on both the sensitivity of the device and the ease of alignment of passive chips to a light source. This paper uses a model previously validated by comparison to physical devices to compare alignment, power loss, and signal quality for windowed, laser line, and laser spot methods of top-down illumination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10142587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101425872023-04-29 Comparison of Illumination Methods for Flow-Through Optofluidic Biosensors Hamblin, Matthew Wright, Joel Schmidt, Holger Hawkins, Aaron R. Micromachines (Basel) Article Optofluidic biosensors have become an important medical diagnostic tool because they allow for rapid, high-sensitivity testing of small samples compared to standard lab testing. For these devices, the practicality of use in a medical setting depends heavily on both the sensitivity of the device and the ease of alignment of passive chips to a light source. This paper uses a model previously validated by comparison to physical devices to compare alignment, power loss, and signal quality for windowed, laser line, and laser spot methods of top-down illumination. MDPI 2023-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10142587/ /pubmed/37420956 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi14040723 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hamblin, Matthew
Wright, Joel
Schmidt, Holger
Hawkins, Aaron R.
Comparison of Illumination Methods for Flow-Through Optofluidic Biosensors
title Comparison of Illumination Methods for Flow-Through Optofluidic Biosensors
title_full Comparison of Illumination Methods for Flow-Through Optofluidic Biosensors
title_fullStr Comparison of Illumination Methods for Flow-Through Optofluidic Biosensors
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Illumination Methods for Flow-Through Optofluidic Biosensors
title_short Comparison of Illumination Methods for Flow-Through Optofluidic Biosensors
title_sort comparison of illumination methods for flow-through optofluidic biosensors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10142587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37420956
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mi14040723
work_keys_str_mv AT hamblinmatthew comparisonofilluminationmethodsforflowthroughoptofluidicbiosensors
AT wrightjoel comparisonofilluminationmethodsforflowthroughoptofluidicbiosensors
AT schmidtholger comparisonofilluminationmethodsforflowthroughoptofluidicbiosensors
AT hawkinsaaronr comparisonofilluminationmethodsforflowthroughoptofluidicbiosensors