Cargando…
A Method for Evaluating Robustness of Limited Sampling Strategies—Exemplified by Serum Iohexol Clearance for Determination of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate
In combination with Bayesian estimates based on a population pharmacokinetic model, limited sampling strategies (LSS) may reduce the number of samples required for individual pharmacokinetic parameter estimations. Such strategies reduce the burden when assessing the area under the concentration vers...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10143161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37111559 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15041073 |
_version_ | 1785033785610338304 |
---|---|
author | Hovd, Markus Robertsen, Ida Woillard, Jean-Baptiste Åsberg, Anders |
author_facet | Hovd, Markus Robertsen, Ida Woillard, Jean-Baptiste Åsberg, Anders |
author_sort | Hovd, Markus |
collection | PubMed |
description | In combination with Bayesian estimates based on a population pharmacokinetic model, limited sampling strategies (LSS) may reduce the number of samples required for individual pharmacokinetic parameter estimations. Such strategies reduce the burden when assessing the area under the concentration versus time curves (AUC) in therapeutic drug monitoring. However, it is not uncommon for the actual sample time to deviate from the optimal one. In this work, we evaluate the robustness of parameter estimations to such deviations in an LSS. A previously developed 4-point LSS for estimation of serum iohexol clearance (i.e., dose/AUC) was used to exemplify the effect of sample time deviations. Two parallel strategies were used: (a) shifting the exact sampling time by an empirical amount of time for each of the four individual sample points, and (b) introducing a random error across all sample points. The investigated iohexol LSS appeared robust to deviations from optimal sample times, both across individual and multiple sample points. The proportion of individuals with a relative error greater than 15% (P15) was 5.3% in the reference run with optimally timed sampling, which increased to a maximum of 8.3% following the introduction of random error in sample time across all four time points. We propose to apply the present method for the validation of LSS developed for clinical use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10143161 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101431612023-04-29 A Method for Evaluating Robustness of Limited Sampling Strategies—Exemplified by Serum Iohexol Clearance for Determination of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate Hovd, Markus Robertsen, Ida Woillard, Jean-Baptiste Åsberg, Anders Pharmaceutics Article In combination with Bayesian estimates based on a population pharmacokinetic model, limited sampling strategies (LSS) may reduce the number of samples required for individual pharmacokinetic parameter estimations. Such strategies reduce the burden when assessing the area under the concentration versus time curves (AUC) in therapeutic drug monitoring. However, it is not uncommon for the actual sample time to deviate from the optimal one. In this work, we evaluate the robustness of parameter estimations to such deviations in an LSS. A previously developed 4-point LSS for estimation of serum iohexol clearance (i.e., dose/AUC) was used to exemplify the effect of sample time deviations. Two parallel strategies were used: (a) shifting the exact sampling time by an empirical amount of time for each of the four individual sample points, and (b) introducing a random error across all sample points. The investigated iohexol LSS appeared robust to deviations from optimal sample times, both across individual and multiple sample points. The proportion of individuals with a relative error greater than 15% (P15) was 5.3% in the reference run with optimally timed sampling, which increased to a maximum of 8.3% following the introduction of random error in sample time across all four time points. We propose to apply the present method for the validation of LSS developed for clinical use. MDPI 2023-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10143161/ /pubmed/37111559 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15041073 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hovd, Markus Robertsen, Ida Woillard, Jean-Baptiste Åsberg, Anders A Method for Evaluating Robustness of Limited Sampling Strategies—Exemplified by Serum Iohexol Clearance for Determination of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate |
title | A Method for Evaluating Robustness of Limited Sampling Strategies—Exemplified by Serum Iohexol Clearance for Determination of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate |
title_full | A Method for Evaluating Robustness of Limited Sampling Strategies—Exemplified by Serum Iohexol Clearance for Determination of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate |
title_fullStr | A Method for Evaluating Robustness of Limited Sampling Strategies—Exemplified by Serum Iohexol Clearance for Determination of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate |
title_full_unstemmed | A Method for Evaluating Robustness of Limited Sampling Strategies—Exemplified by Serum Iohexol Clearance for Determination of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate |
title_short | A Method for Evaluating Robustness of Limited Sampling Strategies—Exemplified by Serum Iohexol Clearance for Determination of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate |
title_sort | method for evaluating robustness of limited sampling strategies—exemplified by serum iohexol clearance for determination of measured glomerular filtration rate |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10143161/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37111559 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15041073 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hovdmarkus amethodforevaluatingrobustnessoflimitedsamplingstrategiesexemplifiedbyserumiohexolclearancefordeterminationofmeasuredglomerularfiltrationrate AT robertsenida amethodforevaluatingrobustnessoflimitedsamplingstrategiesexemplifiedbyserumiohexolclearancefordeterminationofmeasuredglomerularfiltrationrate AT woillardjeanbaptiste amethodforevaluatingrobustnessoflimitedsamplingstrategiesexemplifiedbyserumiohexolclearancefordeterminationofmeasuredglomerularfiltrationrate AT asberganders amethodforevaluatingrobustnessoflimitedsamplingstrategiesexemplifiedbyserumiohexolclearancefordeterminationofmeasuredglomerularfiltrationrate AT hovdmarkus methodforevaluatingrobustnessoflimitedsamplingstrategiesexemplifiedbyserumiohexolclearancefordeterminationofmeasuredglomerularfiltrationrate AT robertsenida methodforevaluatingrobustnessoflimitedsamplingstrategiesexemplifiedbyserumiohexolclearancefordeterminationofmeasuredglomerularfiltrationrate AT woillardjeanbaptiste methodforevaluatingrobustnessoflimitedsamplingstrategiesexemplifiedbyserumiohexolclearancefordeterminationofmeasuredglomerularfiltrationrate AT asberganders methodforevaluatingrobustnessoflimitedsamplingstrategiesexemplifiedbyserumiohexolclearancefordeterminationofmeasuredglomerularfiltrationrate |