Cargando…

A Method for Evaluating Robustness of Limited Sampling Strategies—Exemplified by Serum Iohexol Clearance for Determination of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate

In combination with Bayesian estimates based on a population pharmacokinetic model, limited sampling strategies (LSS) may reduce the number of samples required for individual pharmacokinetic parameter estimations. Such strategies reduce the burden when assessing the area under the concentration vers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hovd, Markus, Robertsen, Ida, Woillard, Jean-Baptiste, Åsberg, Anders
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10143161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37111559
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15041073
_version_ 1785033785610338304
author Hovd, Markus
Robertsen, Ida
Woillard, Jean-Baptiste
Åsberg, Anders
author_facet Hovd, Markus
Robertsen, Ida
Woillard, Jean-Baptiste
Åsberg, Anders
author_sort Hovd, Markus
collection PubMed
description In combination with Bayesian estimates based on a population pharmacokinetic model, limited sampling strategies (LSS) may reduce the number of samples required for individual pharmacokinetic parameter estimations. Such strategies reduce the burden when assessing the area under the concentration versus time curves (AUC) in therapeutic drug monitoring. However, it is not uncommon for the actual sample time to deviate from the optimal one. In this work, we evaluate the robustness of parameter estimations to such deviations in an LSS. A previously developed 4-point LSS for estimation of serum iohexol clearance (i.e., dose/AUC) was used to exemplify the effect of sample time deviations. Two parallel strategies were used: (a) shifting the exact sampling time by an empirical amount of time for each of the four individual sample points, and (b) introducing a random error across all sample points. The investigated iohexol LSS appeared robust to deviations from optimal sample times, both across individual and multiple sample points. The proportion of individuals with a relative error greater than 15% (P15) was 5.3% in the reference run with optimally timed sampling, which increased to a maximum of 8.3% following the introduction of random error in sample time across all four time points. We propose to apply the present method for the validation of LSS developed for clinical use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10143161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101431612023-04-29 A Method for Evaluating Robustness of Limited Sampling Strategies—Exemplified by Serum Iohexol Clearance for Determination of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate Hovd, Markus Robertsen, Ida Woillard, Jean-Baptiste Åsberg, Anders Pharmaceutics Article In combination with Bayesian estimates based on a population pharmacokinetic model, limited sampling strategies (LSS) may reduce the number of samples required for individual pharmacokinetic parameter estimations. Such strategies reduce the burden when assessing the area under the concentration versus time curves (AUC) in therapeutic drug monitoring. However, it is not uncommon for the actual sample time to deviate from the optimal one. In this work, we evaluate the robustness of parameter estimations to such deviations in an LSS. A previously developed 4-point LSS for estimation of serum iohexol clearance (i.e., dose/AUC) was used to exemplify the effect of sample time deviations. Two parallel strategies were used: (a) shifting the exact sampling time by an empirical amount of time for each of the four individual sample points, and (b) introducing a random error across all sample points. The investigated iohexol LSS appeared robust to deviations from optimal sample times, both across individual and multiple sample points. The proportion of individuals with a relative error greater than 15% (P15) was 5.3% in the reference run with optimally timed sampling, which increased to a maximum of 8.3% following the introduction of random error in sample time across all four time points. We propose to apply the present method for the validation of LSS developed for clinical use. MDPI 2023-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10143161/ /pubmed/37111559 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15041073 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hovd, Markus
Robertsen, Ida
Woillard, Jean-Baptiste
Åsberg, Anders
A Method for Evaluating Robustness of Limited Sampling Strategies—Exemplified by Serum Iohexol Clearance for Determination of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate
title A Method for Evaluating Robustness of Limited Sampling Strategies—Exemplified by Serum Iohexol Clearance for Determination of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate
title_full A Method for Evaluating Robustness of Limited Sampling Strategies—Exemplified by Serum Iohexol Clearance for Determination of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate
title_fullStr A Method for Evaluating Robustness of Limited Sampling Strategies—Exemplified by Serum Iohexol Clearance for Determination of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate
title_full_unstemmed A Method for Evaluating Robustness of Limited Sampling Strategies—Exemplified by Serum Iohexol Clearance for Determination of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate
title_short A Method for Evaluating Robustness of Limited Sampling Strategies—Exemplified by Serum Iohexol Clearance for Determination of Measured Glomerular Filtration Rate
title_sort method for evaluating robustness of limited sampling strategies—exemplified by serum iohexol clearance for determination of measured glomerular filtration rate
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10143161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37111559
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15041073
work_keys_str_mv AT hovdmarkus amethodforevaluatingrobustnessoflimitedsamplingstrategiesexemplifiedbyserumiohexolclearancefordeterminationofmeasuredglomerularfiltrationrate
AT robertsenida amethodforevaluatingrobustnessoflimitedsamplingstrategiesexemplifiedbyserumiohexolclearancefordeterminationofmeasuredglomerularfiltrationrate
AT woillardjeanbaptiste amethodforevaluatingrobustnessoflimitedsamplingstrategiesexemplifiedbyserumiohexolclearancefordeterminationofmeasuredglomerularfiltrationrate
AT asberganders amethodforevaluatingrobustnessoflimitedsamplingstrategiesexemplifiedbyserumiohexolclearancefordeterminationofmeasuredglomerularfiltrationrate
AT hovdmarkus methodforevaluatingrobustnessoflimitedsamplingstrategiesexemplifiedbyserumiohexolclearancefordeterminationofmeasuredglomerularfiltrationrate
AT robertsenida methodforevaluatingrobustnessoflimitedsamplingstrategiesexemplifiedbyserumiohexolclearancefordeterminationofmeasuredglomerularfiltrationrate
AT woillardjeanbaptiste methodforevaluatingrobustnessoflimitedsamplingstrategiesexemplifiedbyserumiohexolclearancefordeterminationofmeasuredglomerularfiltrationrate
AT asberganders methodforevaluatingrobustnessoflimitedsamplingstrategiesexemplifiedbyserumiohexolclearancefordeterminationofmeasuredglomerularfiltrationrate