Cargando…
Treatment of Cesarean Scar and Cervical Pregnancies Using the Ovum Aspiration Set for Intrachorial Methotrexate Injection as a Conservative, Fertility-Preserving Procedure
Background and Objectives: Cesarean scar and cervical pregnancies are rare forms of ectopic pregnancies, occurring in 1 in 2000 and 1 in 9000 pregnancies, respectively. Both entities are medically challenging due to their high morbidity and mortality potential. Materials and Methods: In this retrosp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10143318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37109719 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59040761 |
_version_ | 1785033823111610368 |
---|---|
author | Ge, Isabell Geißler, Carmen Geffroy, Alexandra Juhasz-Böss, Ingolf Wiehle, Philipp Asberger, Jasmin |
author_facet | Ge, Isabell Geißler, Carmen Geffroy, Alexandra Juhasz-Böss, Ingolf Wiehle, Philipp Asberger, Jasmin |
author_sort | Ge, Isabell |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and Objectives: Cesarean scar and cervical pregnancies are rare forms of ectopic pregnancies, occurring in 1 in 2000 and 1 in 9000 pregnancies, respectively. Both entities are medically challenging due to their high morbidity and mortality potential. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed all cesarean scar and cervical pregnancies from 2010 to 2019 in the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of the University Hospital Freiburg, treated with both intrachorial (using the ovum aspiration set) and systemic methotrexate application. Results: We identified seven patients with a cesarean scar and four patients with cervical pregnancies. At diagnosis, the median gestational age was 7 + 1 (range: 5 + 5–9 + 5) weeks and the mean value of ß-hCG was 43,536 (range: 5132–87842) mlU/mL. On average, one dose of intrachorial and two doses of systemic methotrexate were administered per patient. The efficacy rate was 72.7% with three patients (27.3%) needing an additional surgical or interventional procedure. The uterus was preserved in 100% of the patients. Out of the eight patients with follow-up data, five reported subsequent pregnancies (62.5%) that resulted in six live births. None had recurrent cesarean scars or cervical pregnancies. In the subgroup analyses, when comparing cesarean scar pregnancies to cervical pregnancies, patient characteristics, treatment modality, and the outcome did not differ significantly, except for parity (2 versus 0, p = 0.02) and the duration since the last pregnancy (3 vs. 0.75 years, p = 0.048). When comparing cases with successful and failed methotrexate-only treatments, the maternal age was significantly higher in the successful group (34 vs. 27 years, p = 0.02). Localization of the gestation, gestational and maternal age, ß-hCG, and history of preceding pregnancies were non-predictive for the efficacy of the treatment. Conclusions: The combined application of intrachorial and systemic methotrexate for the treatment of cesarean scar and cervical pregnancies has been proven effective, well-tolerated, organ- and fertility-conserving with a low complication rate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10143318 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101433182023-04-29 Treatment of Cesarean Scar and Cervical Pregnancies Using the Ovum Aspiration Set for Intrachorial Methotrexate Injection as a Conservative, Fertility-Preserving Procedure Ge, Isabell Geißler, Carmen Geffroy, Alexandra Juhasz-Böss, Ingolf Wiehle, Philipp Asberger, Jasmin Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: Cesarean scar and cervical pregnancies are rare forms of ectopic pregnancies, occurring in 1 in 2000 and 1 in 9000 pregnancies, respectively. Both entities are medically challenging due to their high morbidity and mortality potential. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed all cesarean scar and cervical pregnancies from 2010 to 2019 in the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of the University Hospital Freiburg, treated with both intrachorial (using the ovum aspiration set) and systemic methotrexate application. Results: We identified seven patients with a cesarean scar and four patients with cervical pregnancies. At diagnosis, the median gestational age was 7 + 1 (range: 5 + 5–9 + 5) weeks and the mean value of ß-hCG was 43,536 (range: 5132–87842) mlU/mL. On average, one dose of intrachorial and two doses of systemic methotrexate were administered per patient. The efficacy rate was 72.7% with three patients (27.3%) needing an additional surgical or interventional procedure. The uterus was preserved in 100% of the patients. Out of the eight patients with follow-up data, five reported subsequent pregnancies (62.5%) that resulted in six live births. None had recurrent cesarean scars or cervical pregnancies. In the subgroup analyses, when comparing cesarean scar pregnancies to cervical pregnancies, patient characteristics, treatment modality, and the outcome did not differ significantly, except for parity (2 versus 0, p = 0.02) and the duration since the last pregnancy (3 vs. 0.75 years, p = 0.048). When comparing cases with successful and failed methotrexate-only treatments, the maternal age was significantly higher in the successful group (34 vs. 27 years, p = 0.02). Localization of the gestation, gestational and maternal age, ß-hCG, and history of preceding pregnancies were non-predictive for the efficacy of the treatment. Conclusions: The combined application of intrachorial and systemic methotrexate for the treatment of cesarean scar and cervical pregnancies has been proven effective, well-tolerated, organ- and fertility-conserving with a low complication rate. MDPI 2023-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10143318/ /pubmed/37109719 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59040761 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Ge, Isabell Geißler, Carmen Geffroy, Alexandra Juhasz-Böss, Ingolf Wiehle, Philipp Asberger, Jasmin Treatment of Cesarean Scar and Cervical Pregnancies Using the Ovum Aspiration Set for Intrachorial Methotrexate Injection as a Conservative, Fertility-Preserving Procedure |
title | Treatment of Cesarean Scar and Cervical Pregnancies Using the Ovum Aspiration Set for Intrachorial Methotrexate Injection as a Conservative, Fertility-Preserving Procedure |
title_full | Treatment of Cesarean Scar and Cervical Pregnancies Using the Ovum Aspiration Set for Intrachorial Methotrexate Injection as a Conservative, Fertility-Preserving Procedure |
title_fullStr | Treatment of Cesarean Scar and Cervical Pregnancies Using the Ovum Aspiration Set for Intrachorial Methotrexate Injection as a Conservative, Fertility-Preserving Procedure |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment of Cesarean Scar and Cervical Pregnancies Using the Ovum Aspiration Set for Intrachorial Methotrexate Injection as a Conservative, Fertility-Preserving Procedure |
title_short | Treatment of Cesarean Scar and Cervical Pregnancies Using the Ovum Aspiration Set for Intrachorial Methotrexate Injection as a Conservative, Fertility-Preserving Procedure |
title_sort | treatment of cesarean scar and cervical pregnancies using the ovum aspiration set for intrachorial methotrexate injection as a conservative, fertility-preserving procedure |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10143318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37109719 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59040761 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT geisabell treatmentofcesareanscarandcervicalpregnanciesusingtheovumaspirationsetforintrachorialmethotrexateinjectionasaconservativefertilitypreservingprocedure AT geißlercarmen treatmentofcesareanscarandcervicalpregnanciesusingtheovumaspirationsetforintrachorialmethotrexateinjectionasaconservativefertilitypreservingprocedure AT geffroyalexandra treatmentofcesareanscarandcervicalpregnanciesusingtheovumaspirationsetforintrachorialmethotrexateinjectionasaconservativefertilitypreservingprocedure AT juhaszbossingolf treatmentofcesareanscarandcervicalpregnanciesusingtheovumaspirationsetforintrachorialmethotrexateinjectionasaconservativefertilitypreservingprocedure AT wiehlephilipp treatmentofcesareanscarandcervicalpregnanciesusingtheovumaspirationsetforintrachorialmethotrexateinjectionasaconservativefertilitypreservingprocedure AT asbergerjasmin treatmentofcesareanscarandcervicalpregnanciesusingtheovumaspirationsetforintrachorialmethotrexateinjectionasaconservativefertilitypreservingprocedure |