Cargando…

Treatment of Cesarean Scar and Cervical Pregnancies Using the Ovum Aspiration Set for Intrachorial Methotrexate Injection as a Conservative, Fertility-Preserving Procedure

Background and Objectives: Cesarean scar and cervical pregnancies are rare forms of ectopic pregnancies, occurring in 1 in 2000 and 1 in 9000 pregnancies, respectively. Both entities are medically challenging due to their high morbidity and mortality potential. Materials and Methods: In this retrosp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ge, Isabell, Geißler, Carmen, Geffroy, Alexandra, Juhasz-Böss, Ingolf, Wiehle, Philipp, Asberger, Jasmin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10143318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37109719
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59040761
_version_ 1785033823111610368
author Ge, Isabell
Geißler, Carmen
Geffroy, Alexandra
Juhasz-Böss, Ingolf
Wiehle, Philipp
Asberger, Jasmin
author_facet Ge, Isabell
Geißler, Carmen
Geffroy, Alexandra
Juhasz-Böss, Ingolf
Wiehle, Philipp
Asberger, Jasmin
author_sort Ge, Isabell
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: Cesarean scar and cervical pregnancies are rare forms of ectopic pregnancies, occurring in 1 in 2000 and 1 in 9000 pregnancies, respectively. Both entities are medically challenging due to their high morbidity and mortality potential. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed all cesarean scar and cervical pregnancies from 2010 to 2019 in the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of the University Hospital Freiburg, treated with both intrachorial (using the ovum aspiration set) and systemic methotrexate application. Results: We identified seven patients with a cesarean scar and four patients with cervical pregnancies. At diagnosis, the median gestational age was 7 + 1 (range: 5 + 5–9 + 5) weeks and the mean value of ß-hCG was 43,536 (range: 5132–87842) mlU/mL. On average, one dose of intrachorial and two doses of systemic methotrexate were administered per patient. The efficacy rate was 72.7% with three patients (27.3%) needing an additional surgical or interventional procedure. The uterus was preserved in 100% of the patients. Out of the eight patients with follow-up data, five reported subsequent pregnancies (62.5%) that resulted in six live births. None had recurrent cesarean scars or cervical pregnancies. In the subgroup analyses, when comparing cesarean scar pregnancies to cervical pregnancies, patient characteristics, treatment modality, and the outcome did not differ significantly, except for parity (2 versus 0, p = 0.02) and the duration since the last pregnancy (3 vs. 0.75 years, p = 0.048). When comparing cases with successful and failed methotrexate-only treatments, the maternal age was significantly higher in the successful group (34 vs. 27 years, p = 0.02). Localization of the gestation, gestational and maternal age, ß-hCG, and history of preceding pregnancies were non-predictive for the efficacy of the treatment. Conclusions: The combined application of intrachorial and systemic methotrexate for the treatment of cesarean scar and cervical pregnancies has been proven effective, well-tolerated, organ- and fertility-conserving with a low complication rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10143318
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101433182023-04-29 Treatment of Cesarean Scar and Cervical Pregnancies Using the Ovum Aspiration Set for Intrachorial Methotrexate Injection as a Conservative, Fertility-Preserving Procedure Ge, Isabell Geißler, Carmen Geffroy, Alexandra Juhasz-Böss, Ingolf Wiehle, Philipp Asberger, Jasmin Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: Cesarean scar and cervical pregnancies are rare forms of ectopic pregnancies, occurring in 1 in 2000 and 1 in 9000 pregnancies, respectively. Both entities are medically challenging due to their high morbidity and mortality potential. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, we analyzed all cesarean scar and cervical pregnancies from 2010 to 2019 in the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of the University Hospital Freiburg, treated with both intrachorial (using the ovum aspiration set) and systemic methotrexate application. Results: We identified seven patients with a cesarean scar and four patients with cervical pregnancies. At diagnosis, the median gestational age was 7 + 1 (range: 5 + 5–9 + 5) weeks and the mean value of ß-hCG was 43,536 (range: 5132–87842) mlU/mL. On average, one dose of intrachorial and two doses of systemic methotrexate were administered per patient. The efficacy rate was 72.7% with three patients (27.3%) needing an additional surgical or interventional procedure. The uterus was preserved in 100% of the patients. Out of the eight patients with follow-up data, five reported subsequent pregnancies (62.5%) that resulted in six live births. None had recurrent cesarean scars or cervical pregnancies. In the subgroup analyses, when comparing cesarean scar pregnancies to cervical pregnancies, patient characteristics, treatment modality, and the outcome did not differ significantly, except for parity (2 versus 0, p = 0.02) and the duration since the last pregnancy (3 vs. 0.75 years, p = 0.048). When comparing cases with successful and failed methotrexate-only treatments, the maternal age was significantly higher in the successful group (34 vs. 27 years, p = 0.02). Localization of the gestation, gestational and maternal age, ß-hCG, and history of preceding pregnancies were non-predictive for the efficacy of the treatment. Conclusions: The combined application of intrachorial and systemic methotrexate for the treatment of cesarean scar and cervical pregnancies has been proven effective, well-tolerated, organ- and fertility-conserving with a low complication rate. MDPI 2023-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10143318/ /pubmed/37109719 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59040761 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ge, Isabell
Geißler, Carmen
Geffroy, Alexandra
Juhasz-Böss, Ingolf
Wiehle, Philipp
Asberger, Jasmin
Treatment of Cesarean Scar and Cervical Pregnancies Using the Ovum Aspiration Set for Intrachorial Methotrexate Injection as a Conservative, Fertility-Preserving Procedure
title Treatment of Cesarean Scar and Cervical Pregnancies Using the Ovum Aspiration Set for Intrachorial Methotrexate Injection as a Conservative, Fertility-Preserving Procedure
title_full Treatment of Cesarean Scar and Cervical Pregnancies Using the Ovum Aspiration Set for Intrachorial Methotrexate Injection as a Conservative, Fertility-Preserving Procedure
title_fullStr Treatment of Cesarean Scar and Cervical Pregnancies Using the Ovum Aspiration Set for Intrachorial Methotrexate Injection as a Conservative, Fertility-Preserving Procedure
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of Cesarean Scar and Cervical Pregnancies Using the Ovum Aspiration Set for Intrachorial Methotrexate Injection as a Conservative, Fertility-Preserving Procedure
title_short Treatment of Cesarean Scar and Cervical Pregnancies Using the Ovum Aspiration Set for Intrachorial Methotrexate Injection as a Conservative, Fertility-Preserving Procedure
title_sort treatment of cesarean scar and cervical pregnancies using the ovum aspiration set for intrachorial methotrexate injection as a conservative, fertility-preserving procedure
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10143318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37109719
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina59040761
work_keys_str_mv AT geisabell treatmentofcesareanscarandcervicalpregnanciesusingtheovumaspirationsetforintrachorialmethotrexateinjectionasaconservativefertilitypreservingprocedure
AT geißlercarmen treatmentofcesareanscarandcervicalpregnanciesusingtheovumaspirationsetforintrachorialmethotrexateinjectionasaconservativefertilitypreservingprocedure
AT geffroyalexandra treatmentofcesareanscarandcervicalpregnanciesusingtheovumaspirationsetforintrachorialmethotrexateinjectionasaconservativefertilitypreservingprocedure
AT juhaszbossingolf treatmentofcesareanscarandcervicalpregnanciesusingtheovumaspirationsetforintrachorialmethotrexateinjectionasaconservativefertilitypreservingprocedure
AT wiehlephilipp treatmentofcesareanscarandcervicalpregnanciesusingtheovumaspirationsetforintrachorialmethotrexateinjectionasaconservativefertilitypreservingprocedure
AT asbergerjasmin treatmentofcesareanscarandcervicalpregnanciesusingtheovumaspirationsetforintrachorialmethotrexateinjectionasaconservativefertilitypreservingprocedure