Cargando…
Cardiac Rehabilitation in Severe Heart Failure Patients with Impella 5.0 Support via the Subclavian Artery Approach Prior to Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
Impella 5.0 circulatory support via subclavian artery (SA) access may be a safe approach for patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation (CR). In this case series, we retrospectively analyzed the demographic characteristics, physical function, and CR data of six patients who underwent Impella 5.0 imp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10143331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37109016 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13040630 |
_version_ | 1785033826275164160 |
---|---|
author | Shimizu, Miho Hiraiwa, Hiroaki Tanaka, Shinya Tsuchikawa, Yohei Ito, Ryota Kazama, Shingo Kimura, Yuki Araki, Takashi Mizutani, Takashi Oishi, Hideo Kuwayama, Tasuku Kondo, Toru Morimoto, Ryota Okumura, Takahiro Ito, Hideki Yoshizumi, Tomo Mutsuga, Masato Usui, Akihiko Murohara, Toyoaki |
author_facet | Shimizu, Miho Hiraiwa, Hiroaki Tanaka, Shinya Tsuchikawa, Yohei Ito, Ryota Kazama, Shingo Kimura, Yuki Araki, Takashi Mizutani, Takashi Oishi, Hideo Kuwayama, Tasuku Kondo, Toru Morimoto, Ryota Okumura, Takahiro Ito, Hideki Yoshizumi, Tomo Mutsuga, Masato Usui, Akihiko Murohara, Toyoaki |
author_sort | Shimizu, Miho |
collection | PubMed |
description | Impella 5.0 circulatory support via subclavian artery (SA) access may be a safe approach for patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation (CR). In this case series, we retrospectively analyzed the demographic characteristics, physical function, and CR data of six patients who underwent Impella 5.0 implantation via the SA prior to left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation between October 2013 and June 2021. The median age was 48 years, and one patient was female. Grip strength was maintained or increased in all patients before LVAD implantation (pre-LVAD) compared to after Impella 5.0 implantation. The pre-LVAD knee extension isometric strength (KEIS) was less than 0.46 kgf/kg in two patients and more than 0.46 kgf/kg in three patients (unavailable KEIS data, n = 1). With Impella 5.0 implantation, two patients could ambulate, one could stand, two could sit on the edge of the bed, and one remained in bed. One patient lost consciousness during CR due to decreased Impella flow. There were no other serious adverse events. Impella 5.0 implantation via the SA allows mobilization, including ambulation, prior to LVAD implantation, and CR can be performed relatively safely. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10143331 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101433312023-04-29 Cardiac Rehabilitation in Severe Heart Failure Patients with Impella 5.0 Support via the Subclavian Artery Approach Prior to Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Shimizu, Miho Hiraiwa, Hiroaki Tanaka, Shinya Tsuchikawa, Yohei Ito, Ryota Kazama, Shingo Kimura, Yuki Araki, Takashi Mizutani, Takashi Oishi, Hideo Kuwayama, Tasuku Kondo, Toru Morimoto, Ryota Okumura, Takahiro Ito, Hideki Yoshizumi, Tomo Mutsuga, Masato Usui, Akihiko Murohara, Toyoaki J Pers Med Case Report Impella 5.0 circulatory support via subclavian artery (SA) access may be a safe approach for patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation (CR). In this case series, we retrospectively analyzed the demographic characteristics, physical function, and CR data of six patients who underwent Impella 5.0 implantation via the SA prior to left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation between October 2013 and June 2021. The median age was 48 years, and one patient was female. Grip strength was maintained or increased in all patients before LVAD implantation (pre-LVAD) compared to after Impella 5.0 implantation. The pre-LVAD knee extension isometric strength (KEIS) was less than 0.46 kgf/kg in two patients and more than 0.46 kgf/kg in three patients (unavailable KEIS data, n = 1). With Impella 5.0 implantation, two patients could ambulate, one could stand, two could sit on the edge of the bed, and one remained in bed. One patient lost consciousness during CR due to decreased Impella flow. There were no other serious adverse events. Impella 5.0 implantation via the SA allows mobilization, including ambulation, prior to LVAD implantation, and CR can be performed relatively safely. MDPI 2023-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10143331/ /pubmed/37109016 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13040630 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Case Report Shimizu, Miho Hiraiwa, Hiroaki Tanaka, Shinya Tsuchikawa, Yohei Ito, Ryota Kazama, Shingo Kimura, Yuki Araki, Takashi Mizutani, Takashi Oishi, Hideo Kuwayama, Tasuku Kondo, Toru Morimoto, Ryota Okumura, Takahiro Ito, Hideki Yoshizumi, Tomo Mutsuga, Masato Usui, Akihiko Murohara, Toyoaki Cardiac Rehabilitation in Severe Heart Failure Patients with Impella 5.0 Support via the Subclavian Artery Approach Prior to Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation |
title | Cardiac Rehabilitation in Severe Heart Failure Patients with Impella 5.0 Support via the Subclavian Artery Approach Prior to Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation |
title_full | Cardiac Rehabilitation in Severe Heart Failure Patients with Impella 5.0 Support via the Subclavian Artery Approach Prior to Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation |
title_fullStr | Cardiac Rehabilitation in Severe Heart Failure Patients with Impella 5.0 Support via the Subclavian Artery Approach Prior to Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Cardiac Rehabilitation in Severe Heart Failure Patients with Impella 5.0 Support via the Subclavian Artery Approach Prior to Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation |
title_short | Cardiac Rehabilitation in Severe Heart Failure Patients with Impella 5.0 Support via the Subclavian Artery Approach Prior to Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation |
title_sort | cardiac rehabilitation in severe heart failure patients with impella 5.0 support via the subclavian artery approach prior to left ventricular assist device implantation |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10143331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37109016 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm13040630 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shimizumiho cardiacrehabilitationinsevereheartfailurepatientswithimpella50supportviathesubclavianarteryapproachpriortoleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation AT hiraiwahiroaki cardiacrehabilitationinsevereheartfailurepatientswithimpella50supportviathesubclavianarteryapproachpriortoleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation AT tanakashinya cardiacrehabilitationinsevereheartfailurepatientswithimpella50supportviathesubclavianarteryapproachpriortoleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation AT tsuchikawayohei cardiacrehabilitationinsevereheartfailurepatientswithimpella50supportviathesubclavianarteryapproachpriortoleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation AT itoryota cardiacrehabilitationinsevereheartfailurepatientswithimpella50supportviathesubclavianarteryapproachpriortoleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation AT kazamashingo cardiacrehabilitationinsevereheartfailurepatientswithimpella50supportviathesubclavianarteryapproachpriortoleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation AT kimurayuki cardiacrehabilitationinsevereheartfailurepatientswithimpella50supportviathesubclavianarteryapproachpriortoleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation AT arakitakashi cardiacrehabilitationinsevereheartfailurepatientswithimpella50supportviathesubclavianarteryapproachpriortoleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation AT mizutanitakashi cardiacrehabilitationinsevereheartfailurepatientswithimpella50supportviathesubclavianarteryapproachpriortoleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation AT oishihideo cardiacrehabilitationinsevereheartfailurepatientswithimpella50supportviathesubclavianarteryapproachpriortoleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation AT kuwayamatasuku cardiacrehabilitationinsevereheartfailurepatientswithimpella50supportviathesubclavianarteryapproachpriortoleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation AT kondotoru cardiacrehabilitationinsevereheartfailurepatientswithimpella50supportviathesubclavianarteryapproachpriortoleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation AT morimotoryota cardiacrehabilitationinsevereheartfailurepatientswithimpella50supportviathesubclavianarteryapproachpriortoleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation AT okumuratakahiro cardiacrehabilitationinsevereheartfailurepatientswithimpella50supportviathesubclavianarteryapproachpriortoleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation AT itohideki cardiacrehabilitationinsevereheartfailurepatientswithimpella50supportviathesubclavianarteryapproachpriortoleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation AT yoshizumitomo cardiacrehabilitationinsevereheartfailurepatientswithimpella50supportviathesubclavianarteryapproachpriortoleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation AT mutsugamasato cardiacrehabilitationinsevereheartfailurepatientswithimpella50supportviathesubclavianarteryapproachpriortoleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation AT usuiakihiko cardiacrehabilitationinsevereheartfailurepatientswithimpella50supportviathesubclavianarteryapproachpriortoleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation AT muroharatoyoaki cardiacrehabilitationinsevereheartfailurepatientswithimpella50supportviathesubclavianarteryapproachpriortoleftventricularassistdeviceimplantation |