Cargando…
Guide Wire Selection (Straight vs. Angled) in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Using a Normal Contrast Catheter Performed by a Trainee: A Single-Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Study
Introduction: Wire-guided cannulation (WGC) during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a selective biliary cannulation technique aimed at improving the successful selective biliary cannulation rate and reducing the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) incidence. This study aimed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10143334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37109253 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082917 |
_version_ | 1785033826978758656 |
---|---|
author | Maki, Takumi Irisawa, Atsushi Yamamiya, Akira Tominaga, Keiichi Abe, Yoko Imbe, Koh Hoshi, Koki Yamabe, Akane Igarashi, Ryo Nakajima, Yuki Sato, Kentaro Shibukawa, Goro |
author_facet | Maki, Takumi Irisawa, Atsushi Yamamiya, Akira Tominaga, Keiichi Abe, Yoko Imbe, Koh Hoshi, Koki Yamabe, Akane Igarashi, Ryo Nakajima, Yuki Sato, Kentaro Shibukawa, Goro |
author_sort | Maki, Takumi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Wire-guided cannulation (WGC) during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a selective biliary cannulation technique aimed at improving the successful selective biliary cannulation rate and reducing the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) incidence. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of angled-tip guidewires (AGW) vs. straight-tip guidewires (SGW) for biliary cannulation via WGC by a trainee. Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-center, open-labeled, randomized, and controlled trial. Fifty-seven patients were enrolled in this study and assigned randomly to two groups (Group A to S and Group S to A). In this study, we started selective biliary cannulation via WGC with an AGW or an SGW for 7 min. If cannulation was unsuccessful, the other guidewire was used, and cannulation was continued for another 7 min (cross-over method). Results: The selective biliary cannulation success rate over 14 min was significantly higher with an AGW compared with an SGW over 14 min (57.8% vs. 34.3%, p = 0.04) and for the second 7-min segment (36.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.04). No significant difference was found for adverse events such as pancreatitis between the two guidewires. Conclusions: Our results suggest that an AGW is recommended for WGC performed by a trainee. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10143334 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101433342023-04-29 Guide Wire Selection (Straight vs. Angled) in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Using a Normal Contrast Catheter Performed by a Trainee: A Single-Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Study Maki, Takumi Irisawa, Atsushi Yamamiya, Akira Tominaga, Keiichi Abe, Yoko Imbe, Koh Hoshi, Koki Yamabe, Akane Igarashi, Ryo Nakajima, Yuki Sato, Kentaro Shibukawa, Goro J Clin Med Article Introduction: Wire-guided cannulation (WGC) during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a selective biliary cannulation technique aimed at improving the successful selective biliary cannulation rate and reducing the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) incidence. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of angled-tip guidewires (AGW) vs. straight-tip guidewires (SGW) for biliary cannulation via WGC by a trainee. Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-center, open-labeled, randomized, and controlled trial. Fifty-seven patients were enrolled in this study and assigned randomly to two groups (Group A to S and Group S to A). In this study, we started selective biliary cannulation via WGC with an AGW or an SGW for 7 min. If cannulation was unsuccessful, the other guidewire was used, and cannulation was continued for another 7 min (cross-over method). Results: The selective biliary cannulation success rate over 14 min was significantly higher with an AGW compared with an SGW over 14 min (57.8% vs. 34.3%, p = 0.04) and for the second 7-min segment (36.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.04). No significant difference was found for adverse events such as pancreatitis between the two guidewires. Conclusions: Our results suggest that an AGW is recommended for WGC performed by a trainee. MDPI 2023-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10143334/ /pubmed/37109253 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082917 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Maki, Takumi Irisawa, Atsushi Yamamiya, Akira Tominaga, Keiichi Abe, Yoko Imbe, Koh Hoshi, Koki Yamabe, Akane Igarashi, Ryo Nakajima, Yuki Sato, Kentaro Shibukawa, Goro Guide Wire Selection (Straight vs. Angled) in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Using a Normal Contrast Catheter Performed by a Trainee: A Single-Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Study |
title | Guide Wire Selection (Straight vs. Angled) in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Using a Normal Contrast Catheter Performed by a Trainee: A Single-Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Study |
title_full | Guide Wire Selection (Straight vs. Angled) in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Using a Normal Contrast Catheter Performed by a Trainee: A Single-Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Study |
title_fullStr | Guide Wire Selection (Straight vs. Angled) in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Using a Normal Contrast Catheter Performed by a Trainee: A Single-Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Guide Wire Selection (Straight vs. Angled) in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Using a Normal Contrast Catheter Performed by a Trainee: A Single-Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Study |
title_short | Guide Wire Selection (Straight vs. Angled) in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Using a Normal Contrast Catheter Performed by a Trainee: A Single-Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Study |
title_sort | guide wire selection (straight vs. angled) in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using a normal contrast catheter performed by a trainee: a single-center prospective randomized controlled cross-over study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10143334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37109253 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082917 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT makitakumi guidewireselectionstraightvsangledinendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyusinganormalcontrastcatheterperformedbyatraineeasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy AT irisawaatsushi guidewireselectionstraightvsangledinendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyusinganormalcontrastcatheterperformedbyatraineeasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy AT yamamiyaakira guidewireselectionstraightvsangledinendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyusinganormalcontrastcatheterperformedbyatraineeasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy AT tominagakeiichi guidewireselectionstraightvsangledinendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyusinganormalcontrastcatheterperformedbyatraineeasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy AT abeyoko guidewireselectionstraightvsangledinendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyusinganormalcontrastcatheterperformedbyatraineeasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy AT imbekoh guidewireselectionstraightvsangledinendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyusinganormalcontrastcatheterperformedbyatraineeasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy AT hoshikoki guidewireselectionstraightvsangledinendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyusinganormalcontrastcatheterperformedbyatraineeasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy AT yamabeakane guidewireselectionstraightvsangledinendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyusinganormalcontrastcatheterperformedbyatraineeasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy AT igarashiryo guidewireselectionstraightvsangledinendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyusinganormalcontrastcatheterperformedbyatraineeasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy AT nakajimayuki guidewireselectionstraightvsangledinendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyusinganormalcontrastcatheterperformedbyatraineeasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy AT satokentaro guidewireselectionstraightvsangledinendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyusinganormalcontrastcatheterperformedbyatraineeasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy AT shibukawagoro guidewireselectionstraightvsangledinendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyusinganormalcontrastcatheterperformedbyatraineeasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy |