Cargando…

Guide Wire Selection (Straight vs. Angled) in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Using a Normal Contrast Catheter Performed by a Trainee: A Single-Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Study

Introduction: Wire-guided cannulation (WGC) during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a selective biliary cannulation technique aimed at improving the successful selective biliary cannulation rate and reducing the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) incidence. This study aimed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maki, Takumi, Irisawa, Atsushi, Yamamiya, Akira, Tominaga, Keiichi, Abe, Yoko, Imbe, Koh, Hoshi, Koki, Yamabe, Akane, Igarashi, Ryo, Nakajima, Yuki, Sato, Kentaro, Shibukawa, Goro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10143334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37109253
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082917
_version_ 1785033826978758656
author Maki, Takumi
Irisawa, Atsushi
Yamamiya, Akira
Tominaga, Keiichi
Abe, Yoko
Imbe, Koh
Hoshi, Koki
Yamabe, Akane
Igarashi, Ryo
Nakajima, Yuki
Sato, Kentaro
Shibukawa, Goro
author_facet Maki, Takumi
Irisawa, Atsushi
Yamamiya, Akira
Tominaga, Keiichi
Abe, Yoko
Imbe, Koh
Hoshi, Koki
Yamabe, Akane
Igarashi, Ryo
Nakajima, Yuki
Sato, Kentaro
Shibukawa, Goro
author_sort Maki, Takumi
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Wire-guided cannulation (WGC) during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a selective biliary cannulation technique aimed at improving the successful selective biliary cannulation rate and reducing the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) incidence. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of angled-tip guidewires (AGW) vs. straight-tip guidewires (SGW) for biliary cannulation via WGC by a trainee. Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-center, open-labeled, randomized, and controlled trial. Fifty-seven patients were enrolled in this study and assigned randomly to two groups (Group A to S and Group S to A). In this study, we started selective biliary cannulation via WGC with an AGW or an SGW for 7 min. If cannulation was unsuccessful, the other guidewire was used, and cannulation was continued for another 7 min (cross-over method). Results: The selective biliary cannulation success rate over 14 min was significantly higher with an AGW compared with an SGW over 14 min (57.8% vs. 34.3%, p = 0.04) and for the second 7-min segment (36.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.04). No significant difference was found for adverse events such as pancreatitis between the two guidewires. Conclusions: Our results suggest that an AGW is recommended for WGC performed by a trainee.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10143334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101433342023-04-29 Guide Wire Selection (Straight vs. Angled) in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Using a Normal Contrast Catheter Performed by a Trainee: A Single-Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Study Maki, Takumi Irisawa, Atsushi Yamamiya, Akira Tominaga, Keiichi Abe, Yoko Imbe, Koh Hoshi, Koki Yamabe, Akane Igarashi, Ryo Nakajima, Yuki Sato, Kentaro Shibukawa, Goro J Clin Med Article Introduction: Wire-guided cannulation (WGC) during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a selective biliary cannulation technique aimed at improving the successful selective biliary cannulation rate and reducing the rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) incidence. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of angled-tip guidewires (AGW) vs. straight-tip guidewires (SGW) for biliary cannulation via WGC by a trainee. Methods: We conducted a prospective, single-center, open-labeled, randomized, and controlled trial. Fifty-seven patients were enrolled in this study and assigned randomly to two groups (Group A to S and Group S to A). In this study, we started selective biliary cannulation via WGC with an AGW or an SGW for 7 min. If cannulation was unsuccessful, the other guidewire was used, and cannulation was continued for another 7 min (cross-over method). Results: The selective biliary cannulation success rate over 14 min was significantly higher with an AGW compared with an SGW over 14 min (57.8% vs. 34.3%, p = 0.04) and for the second 7-min segment (36.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.04). No significant difference was found for adverse events such as pancreatitis between the two guidewires. Conclusions: Our results suggest that an AGW is recommended for WGC performed by a trainee. MDPI 2023-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10143334/ /pubmed/37109253 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082917 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Maki, Takumi
Irisawa, Atsushi
Yamamiya, Akira
Tominaga, Keiichi
Abe, Yoko
Imbe, Koh
Hoshi, Koki
Yamabe, Akane
Igarashi, Ryo
Nakajima, Yuki
Sato, Kentaro
Shibukawa, Goro
Guide Wire Selection (Straight vs. Angled) in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Using a Normal Contrast Catheter Performed by a Trainee: A Single-Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Study
title Guide Wire Selection (Straight vs. Angled) in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Using a Normal Contrast Catheter Performed by a Trainee: A Single-Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Study
title_full Guide Wire Selection (Straight vs. Angled) in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Using a Normal Contrast Catheter Performed by a Trainee: A Single-Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Study
title_fullStr Guide Wire Selection (Straight vs. Angled) in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Using a Normal Contrast Catheter Performed by a Trainee: A Single-Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Study
title_full_unstemmed Guide Wire Selection (Straight vs. Angled) in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Using a Normal Contrast Catheter Performed by a Trainee: A Single-Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Study
title_short Guide Wire Selection (Straight vs. Angled) in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Using a Normal Contrast Catheter Performed by a Trainee: A Single-Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Cross-Over Study
title_sort guide wire selection (straight vs. angled) in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography using a normal contrast catheter performed by a trainee: a single-center prospective randomized controlled cross-over study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10143334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37109253
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082917
work_keys_str_mv AT makitakumi guidewireselectionstraightvsangledinendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyusinganormalcontrastcatheterperformedbyatraineeasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT irisawaatsushi guidewireselectionstraightvsangledinendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyusinganormalcontrastcatheterperformedbyatraineeasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT yamamiyaakira guidewireselectionstraightvsangledinendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyusinganormalcontrastcatheterperformedbyatraineeasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT tominagakeiichi guidewireselectionstraightvsangledinendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyusinganormalcontrastcatheterperformedbyatraineeasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT abeyoko guidewireselectionstraightvsangledinendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyusinganormalcontrastcatheterperformedbyatraineeasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT imbekoh guidewireselectionstraightvsangledinendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyusinganormalcontrastcatheterperformedbyatraineeasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT hoshikoki guidewireselectionstraightvsangledinendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyusinganormalcontrastcatheterperformedbyatraineeasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT yamabeakane guidewireselectionstraightvsangledinendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyusinganormalcontrastcatheterperformedbyatraineeasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT igarashiryo guidewireselectionstraightvsangledinendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyusinganormalcontrastcatheterperformedbyatraineeasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT nakajimayuki guidewireselectionstraightvsangledinendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyusinganormalcontrastcatheterperformedbyatraineeasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT satokentaro guidewireselectionstraightvsangledinendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyusinganormalcontrastcatheterperformedbyatraineeasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy
AT shibukawagoro guidewireselectionstraightvsangledinendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyusinganormalcontrastcatheterperformedbyatraineeasinglecenterprospectiverandomizedcontrolledcrossoverstudy