Cargando…
Stronger than Ever: Multifilament Fiberglass Posts Boost Maxillary Premolar Fracture Resistance
This paper investigates the influence of cavity configuration and post-endodontic restoration on the fracture resistance, failure mode and stress distribution of premolars by using a method of fracture failure test and finite elements analysis (FEA) coupled to Weibull analysis (WA). One hundred prem...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10143755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37109310 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082975 |
_version_ | 1785033932900663296 |
---|---|
author | Kharouf, Naji Pedullà, Eugenio Plotino, Gianluca Jmal, Hamdi Alloui, Mohammed-El-Habib Simonis, Philippine Laquerriere, Patrice Macaluso, Valentina Abdellatif, Dina Richert, Raphaël Haikel, Youssef Mancino, Davide |
author_facet | Kharouf, Naji Pedullà, Eugenio Plotino, Gianluca Jmal, Hamdi Alloui, Mohammed-El-Habib Simonis, Philippine Laquerriere, Patrice Macaluso, Valentina Abdellatif, Dina Richert, Raphaël Haikel, Youssef Mancino, Davide |
author_sort | Kharouf, Naji |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper investigates the influence of cavity configuration and post-endodontic restoration on the fracture resistance, failure mode and stress distribution of premolars by using a method of fracture failure test and finite elements analysis (FEA) coupled to Weibull analysis (WA). One hundred premolars were divided into one control group (G(contr)) (n = 10) and three experimental groups, according to the post-endodontic restoration (n = 30), G(1), restored using composite, G(2), restored using single fiber post and G(3), restored using multifilament fiberglass posts (m-FGP) without post-space preparation. Each experimental group was divided into three subgroups according to the type of coronal cavity configuration (n = 10): G(1O), G(2O,) and G(3O) with occlusal (O) cavity configuration; G(1MO), G(2MO), and G(3MO) with mesio-occlusal (MO); and G(1MOD), G(2MOD), and G(3MOD) with mesio-occluso-distal (MOD). After thermomechanical aging, all the specimens were tested under compression load, and failure mode was determined. FEA and WA supplemented destructive tests. Data were statistically analyzed. Irrespective of residual tooth substance, G(1) and G(2) exhibited lower fracture resistance than G(contr) (p < 0.05), whereas G(3) showed no difference compared to G(contr) (p > 0.05). Regarding the type of restoration, no difference was highlighted between G(1O) and G(2O,) G(1MO) and G(2MO,) or G(1MOD) and G(2MOD) (p > 0.05), whereas G(3O,) G(3MO,) and G(3MOD) exhibit higher fracture resistance (p < 0.05) than G(1O) and G(2O), G(1MO) and G(2MO), and G(1MOD) and G(2MOD), respectively. Regarding cavity configuration: in G(1) and G(2,) G(1O) and G(2O) exhibited higher fracture resistance than G(1MOD) and G(2MOD), respectively (p < 0.05). In G(3), there was no difference among G(3O), G(3MO) and G(3MOD) (p > 0.05). No difference was found among the different groups and subgroups regarding the failure mode. After aging, premolars restored with multifilament fiberglass posts demonstrated fracture resistance values comparable to those of an intact tooth, irrespective of the different type of cavity configuration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10143755 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101437552023-04-29 Stronger than Ever: Multifilament Fiberglass Posts Boost Maxillary Premolar Fracture Resistance Kharouf, Naji Pedullà, Eugenio Plotino, Gianluca Jmal, Hamdi Alloui, Mohammed-El-Habib Simonis, Philippine Laquerriere, Patrice Macaluso, Valentina Abdellatif, Dina Richert, Raphaël Haikel, Youssef Mancino, Davide J Clin Med Article This paper investigates the influence of cavity configuration and post-endodontic restoration on the fracture resistance, failure mode and stress distribution of premolars by using a method of fracture failure test and finite elements analysis (FEA) coupled to Weibull analysis (WA). One hundred premolars were divided into one control group (G(contr)) (n = 10) and three experimental groups, according to the post-endodontic restoration (n = 30), G(1), restored using composite, G(2), restored using single fiber post and G(3), restored using multifilament fiberglass posts (m-FGP) without post-space preparation. Each experimental group was divided into three subgroups according to the type of coronal cavity configuration (n = 10): G(1O), G(2O,) and G(3O) with occlusal (O) cavity configuration; G(1MO), G(2MO), and G(3MO) with mesio-occlusal (MO); and G(1MOD), G(2MOD), and G(3MOD) with mesio-occluso-distal (MOD). After thermomechanical aging, all the specimens were tested under compression load, and failure mode was determined. FEA and WA supplemented destructive tests. Data were statistically analyzed. Irrespective of residual tooth substance, G(1) and G(2) exhibited lower fracture resistance than G(contr) (p < 0.05), whereas G(3) showed no difference compared to G(contr) (p > 0.05). Regarding the type of restoration, no difference was highlighted between G(1O) and G(2O,) G(1MO) and G(2MO,) or G(1MOD) and G(2MOD) (p > 0.05), whereas G(3O,) G(3MO,) and G(3MOD) exhibit higher fracture resistance (p < 0.05) than G(1O) and G(2O), G(1MO) and G(2MO), and G(1MOD) and G(2MOD), respectively. Regarding cavity configuration: in G(1) and G(2,) G(1O) and G(2O) exhibited higher fracture resistance than G(1MOD) and G(2MOD), respectively (p < 0.05). In G(3), there was no difference among G(3O), G(3MO) and G(3MOD) (p > 0.05). No difference was found among the different groups and subgroups regarding the failure mode. After aging, premolars restored with multifilament fiberglass posts demonstrated fracture resistance values comparable to those of an intact tooth, irrespective of the different type of cavity configuration. MDPI 2023-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10143755/ /pubmed/37109310 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082975 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kharouf, Naji Pedullà, Eugenio Plotino, Gianluca Jmal, Hamdi Alloui, Mohammed-El-Habib Simonis, Philippine Laquerriere, Patrice Macaluso, Valentina Abdellatif, Dina Richert, Raphaël Haikel, Youssef Mancino, Davide Stronger than Ever: Multifilament Fiberglass Posts Boost Maxillary Premolar Fracture Resistance |
title | Stronger than Ever: Multifilament Fiberglass Posts Boost Maxillary Premolar Fracture Resistance |
title_full | Stronger than Ever: Multifilament Fiberglass Posts Boost Maxillary Premolar Fracture Resistance |
title_fullStr | Stronger than Ever: Multifilament Fiberglass Posts Boost Maxillary Premolar Fracture Resistance |
title_full_unstemmed | Stronger than Ever: Multifilament Fiberglass Posts Boost Maxillary Premolar Fracture Resistance |
title_short | Stronger than Ever: Multifilament Fiberglass Posts Boost Maxillary Premolar Fracture Resistance |
title_sort | stronger than ever: multifilament fiberglass posts boost maxillary premolar fracture resistance |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10143755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37109310 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082975 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kharoufnaji strongerthanevermultifilamentfiberglasspostsboostmaxillarypremolarfractureresistance AT pedullaeugenio strongerthanevermultifilamentfiberglasspostsboostmaxillarypremolarfractureresistance AT plotinogianluca strongerthanevermultifilamentfiberglasspostsboostmaxillarypremolarfractureresistance AT jmalhamdi strongerthanevermultifilamentfiberglasspostsboostmaxillarypremolarfractureresistance AT allouimohammedelhabib strongerthanevermultifilamentfiberglasspostsboostmaxillarypremolarfractureresistance AT simonisphilippine strongerthanevermultifilamentfiberglasspostsboostmaxillarypremolarfractureresistance AT laquerrierepatrice strongerthanevermultifilamentfiberglasspostsboostmaxillarypremolarfractureresistance AT macalusovalentina strongerthanevermultifilamentfiberglasspostsboostmaxillarypremolarfractureresistance AT abdellatifdina strongerthanevermultifilamentfiberglasspostsboostmaxillarypremolarfractureresistance AT richertraphael strongerthanevermultifilamentfiberglasspostsboostmaxillarypremolarfractureresistance AT haikelyoussef strongerthanevermultifilamentfiberglasspostsboostmaxillarypremolarfractureresistance AT mancinodavide strongerthanevermultifilamentfiberglasspostsboostmaxillarypremolarfractureresistance |