Cargando…

Stronger than Ever: Multifilament Fiberglass Posts Boost Maxillary Premolar Fracture Resistance

This paper investigates the influence of cavity configuration and post-endodontic restoration on the fracture resistance, failure mode and stress distribution of premolars by using a method of fracture failure test and finite elements analysis (FEA) coupled to Weibull analysis (WA). One hundred prem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kharouf, Naji, Pedullà, Eugenio, Plotino, Gianluca, Jmal, Hamdi, Alloui, Mohammed-El-Habib, Simonis, Philippine, Laquerriere, Patrice, Macaluso, Valentina, Abdellatif, Dina, Richert, Raphaël, Haikel, Youssef, Mancino, Davide
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10143755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37109310
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082975
_version_ 1785033932900663296
author Kharouf, Naji
Pedullà, Eugenio
Plotino, Gianluca
Jmal, Hamdi
Alloui, Mohammed-El-Habib
Simonis, Philippine
Laquerriere, Patrice
Macaluso, Valentina
Abdellatif, Dina
Richert, Raphaël
Haikel, Youssef
Mancino, Davide
author_facet Kharouf, Naji
Pedullà, Eugenio
Plotino, Gianluca
Jmal, Hamdi
Alloui, Mohammed-El-Habib
Simonis, Philippine
Laquerriere, Patrice
Macaluso, Valentina
Abdellatif, Dina
Richert, Raphaël
Haikel, Youssef
Mancino, Davide
author_sort Kharouf, Naji
collection PubMed
description This paper investigates the influence of cavity configuration and post-endodontic restoration on the fracture resistance, failure mode and stress distribution of premolars by using a method of fracture failure test and finite elements analysis (FEA) coupled to Weibull analysis (WA). One hundred premolars were divided into one control group (G(contr)) (n = 10) and three experimental groups, according to the post-endodontic restoration (n = 30), G(1), restored using composite, G(2), restored using single fiber post and G(3), restored using multifilament fiberglass posts (m-FGP) without post-space preparation. Each experimental group was divided into three subgroups according to the type of coronal cavity configuration (n = 10): G(1O), G(2O,) and G(3O) with occlusal (O) cavity configuration; G(1MO), G(2MO), and G(3MO) with mesio-occlusal (MO); and G(1MOD), G(2MOD), and G(3MOD) with mesio-occluso-distal (MOD). After thermomechanical aging, all the specimens were tested under compression load, and failure mode was determined. FEA and WA supplemented destructive tests. Data were statistically analyzed. Irrespective of residual tooth substance, G(1) and G(2) exhibited lower fracture resistance than G(contr) (p < 0.05), whereas G(3) showed no difference compared to G(contr) (p > 0.05). Regarding the type of restoration, no difference was highlighted between G(1O) and G(2O,) G(1MO) and G(2MO,) or G(1MOD) and G(2MOD) (p > 0.05), whereas G(3O,) G(3MO,) and G(3MOD) exhibit higher fracture resistance (p < 0.05) than G(1O) and G(2O), G(1MO) and G(2MO), and G(1MOD) and G(2MOD), respectively. Regarding cavity configuration: in G(1) and G(2,) G(1O) and G(2O) exhibited higher fracture resistance than G(1MOD) and G(2MOD), respectively (p < 0.05). In G(3), there was no difference among G(3O), G(3MO) and G(3MOD) (p > 0.05). No difference was found among the different groups and subgroups regarding the failure mode. After aging, premolars restored with multifilament fiberglass posts demonstrated fracture resistance values comparable to those of an intact tooth, irrespective of the different type of cavity configuration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10143755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101437552023-04-29 Stronger than Ever: Multifilament Fiberglass Posts Boost Maxillary Premolar Fracture Resistance Kharouf, Naji Pedullà, Eugenio Plotino, Gianluca Jmal, Hamdi Alloui, Mohammed-El-Habib Simonis, Philippine Laquerriere, Patrice Macaluso, Valentina Abdellatif, Dina Richert, Raphaël Haikel, Youssef Mancino, Davide J Clin Med Article This paper investigates the influence of cavity configuration and post-endodontic restoration on the fracture resistance, failure mode and stress distribution of premolars by using a method of fracture failure test and finite elements analysis (FEA) coupled to Weibull analysis (WA). One hundred premolars were divided into one control group (G(contr)) (n = 10) and three experimental groups, according to the post-endodontic restoration (n = 30), G(1), restored using composite, G(2), restored using single fiber post and G(3), restored using multifilament fiberglass posts (m-FGP) without post-space preparation. Each experimental group was divided into three subgroups according to the type of coronal cavity configuration (n = 10): G(1O), G(2O,) and G(3O) with occlusal (O) cavity configuration; G(1MO), G(2MO), and G(3MO) with mesio-occlusal (MO); and G(1MOD), G(2MOD), and G(3MOD) with mesio-occluso-distal (MOD). After thermomechanical aging, all the specimens were tested under compression load, and failure mode was determined. FEA and WA supplemented destructive tests. Data were statistically analyzed. Irrespective of residual tooth substance, G(1) and G(2) exhibited lower fracture resistance than G(contr) (p < 0.05), whereas G(3) showed no difference compared to G(contr) (p > 0.05). Regarding the type of restoration, no difference was highlighted between G(1O) and G(2O,) G(1MO) and G(2MO,) or G(1MOD) and G(2MOD) (p > 0.05), whereas G(3O,) G(3MO,) and G(3MOD) exhibit higher fracture resistance (p < 0.05) than G(1O) and G(2O), G(1MO) and G(2MO), and G(1MOD) and G(2MOD), respectively. Regarding cavity configuration: in G(1) and G(2,) G(1O) and G(2O) exhibited higher fracture resistance than G(1MOD) and G(2MOD), respectively (p < 0.05). In G(3), there was no difference among G(3O), G(3MO) and G(3MOD) (p > 0.05). No difference was found among the different groups and subgroups regarding the failure mode. After aging, premolars restored with multifilament fiberglass posts demonstrated fracture resistance values comparable to those of an intact tooth, irrespective of the different type of cavity configuration. MDPI 2023-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10143755/ /pubmed/37109310 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082975 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kharouf, Naji
Pedullà, Eugenio
Plotino, Gianluca
Jmal, Hamdi
Alloui, Mohammed-El-Habib
Simonis, Philippine
Laquerriere, Patrice
Macaluso, Valentina
Abdellatif, Dina
Richert, Raphaël
Haikel, Youssef
Mancino, Davide
Stronger than Ever: Multifilament Fiberglass Posts Boost Maxillary Premolar Fracture Resistance
title Stronger than Ever: Multifilament Fiberglass Posts Boost Maxillary Premolar Fracture Resistance
title_full Stronger than Ever: Multifilament Fiberglass Posts Boost Maxillary Premolar Fracture Resistance
title_fullStr Stronger than Ever: Multifilament Fiberglass Posts Boost Maxillary Premolar Fracture Resistance
title_full_unstemmed Stronger than Ever: Multifilament Fiberglass Posts Boost Maxillary Premolar Fracture Resistance
title_short Stronger than Ever: Multifilament Fiberglass Posts Boost Maxillary Premolar Fracture Resistance
title_sort stronger than ever: multifilament fiberglass posts boost maxillary premolar fracture resistance
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10143755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37109310
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082975
work_keys_str_mv AT kharoufnaji strongerthanevermultifilamentfiberglasspostsboostmaxillarypremolarfractureresistance
AT pedullaeugenio strongerthanevermultifilamentfiberglasspostsboostmaxillarypremolarfractureresistance
AT plotinogianluca strongerthanevermultifilamentfiberglasspostsboostmaxillarypremolarfractureresistance
AT jmalhamdi strongerthanevermultifilamentfiberglasspostsboostmaxillarypremolarfractureresistance
AT allouimohammedelhabib strongerthanevermultifilamentfiberglasspostsboostmaxillarypremolarfractureresistance
AT simonisphilippine strongerthanevermultifilamentfiberglasspostsboostmaxillarypremolarfractureresistance
AT laquerrierepatrice strongerthanevermultifilamentfiberglasspostsboostmaxillarypremolarfractureresistance
AT macalusovalentina strongerthanevermultifilamentfiberglasspostsboostmaxillarypremolarfractureresistance
AT abdellatifdina strongerthanevermultifilamentfiberglasspostsboostmaxillarypremolarfractureresistance
AT richertraphael strongerthanevermultifilamentfiberglasspostsboostmaxillarypremolarfractureresistance
AT haikelyoussef strongerthanevermultifilamentfiberglasspostsboostmaxillarypremolarfractureresistance
AT mancinodavide strongerthanevermultifilamentfiberglasspostsboostmaxillarypremolarfractureresistance