Cargando…

Ecotoxicological Assessment of Polluted Soils One Year after the Application of Different Soil Remediation Techniques

The present work evaluated the influence of eight different soil remediation techniques, based on the use of residual materials (gypsum, marble, vermicompost) on the reduction in metal(loid)s toxicity (Cu, Zn, As, Pb and Cd) in a polluted natural area. Selected remediation treatments were applied in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paniagua-López, Mario, Aguilar-Garrido, Antonio, Contero-Hurtado, José, García-Romera, Inmaculada, Sierra-Aragón, Manuel, Romero-Freire, Ana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10143980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37112525
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics11040298
_version_ 1785033991129137152
author Paniagua-López, Mario
Aguilar-Garrido, Antonio
Contero-Hurtado, José
García-Romera, Inmaculada
Sierra-Aragón, Manuel
Romero-Freire, Ana
author_facet Paniagua-López, Mario
Aguilar-Garrido, Antonio
Contero-Hurtado, José
García-Romera, Inmaculada
Sierra-Aragón, Manuel
Romero-Freire, Ana
author_sort Paniagua-López, Mario
collection PubMed
description The present work evaluated the influence of eight different soil remediation techniques, based on the use of residual materials (gypsum, marble, vermicompost) on the reduction in metal(loid)s toxicity (Cu, Zn, As, Pb and Cd) in a polluted natural area. Selected remediation treatments were applied in a field exposed to real conditions and they were evaluated one year after the application. More specifically, five ecotoxicological tests were carried out using different organisms on either the solid or the aqueous (leachate) fraction of the amended soils. Likewise, the main soil properties and the total, water-soluble and bioavailable metal fractions were determined to evaluate their influence on soil toxicity. According to the toxicity bioassays performed, the response of organisms to the treatments differed depending on whether the solid or the aqueous fraction was used. Our results highlighted that the use of a single bioassay may not be sufficient as an indicator of toxicity pathways to select soil remediation methods, so that the joint determination of metal availability and ecotoxicological response will be determinant for the correct establishment of any remediation technique carried out under natural conditions. Our results indicated that, of the different treatments used, the best technique for the remediation of metal(loid)s toxicity was the addition of marble sludge with vermicompost.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10143980
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101439802023-04-29 Ecotoxicological Assessment of Polluted Soils One Year after the Application of Different Soil Remediation Techniques Paniagua-López, Mario Aguilar-Garrido, Antonio Contero-Hurtado, José García-Romera, Inmaculada Sierra-Aragón, Manuel Romero-Freire, Ana Toxics Article The present work evaluated the influence of eight different soil remediation techniques, based on the use of residual materials (gypsum, marble, vermicompost) on the reduction in metal(loid)s toxicity (Cu, Zn, As, Pb and Cd) in a polluted natural area. Selected remediation treatments were applied in a field exposed to real conditions and they were evaluated one year after the application. More specifically, five ecotoxicological tests were carried out using different organisms on either the solid or the aqueous (leachate) fraction of the amended soils. Likewise, the main soil properties and the total, water-soluble and bioavailable metal fractions were determined to evaluate their influence on soil toxicity. According to the toxicity bioassays performed, the response of organisms to the treatments differed depending on whether the solid or the aqueous fraction was used. Our results highlighted that the use of a single bioassay may not be sufficient as an indicator of toxicity pathways to select soil remediation methods, so that the joint determination of metal availability and ecotoxicological response will be determinant for the correct establishment of any remediation technique carried out under natural conditions. Our results indicated that, of the different treatments used, the best technique for the remediation of metal(loid)s toxicity was the addition of marble sludge with vermicompost. MDPI 2023-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10143980/ /pubmed/37112525 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics11040298 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Paniagua-López, Mario
Aguilar-Garrido, Antonio
Contero-Hurtado, José
García-Romera, Inmaculada
Sierra-Aragón, Manuel
Romero-Freire, Ana
Ecotoxicological Assessment of Polluted Soils One Year after the Application of Different Soil Remediation Techniques
title Ecotoxicological Assessment of Polluted Soils One Year after the Application of Different Soil Remediation Techniques
title_full Ecotoxicological Assessment of Polluted Soils One Year after the Application of Different Soil Remediation Techniques
title_fullStr Ecotoxicological Assessment of Polluted Soils One Year after the Application of Different Soil Remediation Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Ecotoxicological Assessment of Polluted Soils One Year after the Application of Different Soil Remediation Techniques
title_short Ecotoxicological Assessment of Polluted Soils One Year after the Application of Different Soil Remediation Techniques
title_sort ecotoxicological assessment of polluted soils one year after the application of different soil remediation techniques
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10143980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37112525
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics11040298
work_keys_str_mv AT paniagualopezmario ecotoxicologicalassessmentofpollutedsoilsoneyearaftertheapplicationofdifferentsoilremediationtechniques
AT aguilargarridoantonio ecotoxicologicalassessmentofpollutedsoilsoneyearaftertheapplicationofdifferentsoilremediationtechniques
AT conterohurtadojose ecotoxicologicalassessmentofpollutedsoilsoneyearaftertheapplicationofdifferentsoilremediationtechniques
AT garciaromerainmaculada ecotoxicologicalassessmentofpollutedsoilsoneyearaftertheapplicationofdifferentsoilremediationtechniques
AT sierraaragonmanuel ecotoxicologicalassessmentofpollutedsoilsoneyearaftertheapplicationofdifferentsoilremediationtechniques
AT romerofreireana ecotoxicologicalassessmentofpollutedsoilsoneyearaftertheapplicationofdifferentsoilremediationtechniques