Cargando…

Head-to-Head Comparison between [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi and [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT Imaging in Patients with Breast Cancer

This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi with that of [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT in detecting primary and metastatic lesions of breast cancer. [(18)F]F-FDG and [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi PET/CT scans of histologically proven breast cancer patients were compared accordi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ballal, Sanjana, Yadav, Madhav P., Roesch, Frank, Wakade, Nicky, Raju, Shobhana, Sheokand, Parvind, Mishra, Prashant, Moon, Euy Sung, Tripathi, Madhavi, Martin, Marcel, Bal, Chandrasekhar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10144331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37111277
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph16040521
_version_ 1785034074909310976
author Ballal, Sanjana
Yadav, Madhav P.
Roesch, Frank
Wakade, Nicky
Raju, Shobhana
Sheokand, Parvind
Mishra, Prashant
Moon, Euy Sung
Tripathi, Madhavi
Martin, Marcel
Bal, Chandrasekhar
author_facet Ballal, Sanjana
Yadav, Madhav P.
Roesch, Frank
Wakade, Nicky
Raju, Shobhana
Sheokand, Parvind
Mishra, Prashant
Moon, Euy Sung
Tripathi, Madhavi
Martin, Marcel
Bal, Chandrasekhar
author_sort Ballal, Sanjana
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi with that of [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT in detecting primary and metastatic lesions of breast cancer. [(18)F]F-FDG and [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi PET/CT scans of histologically proven breast cancer patients were compared according to patient-based and lesion-based analysis. Forty-seven patients with a mean age of 44.8 ± 9.9 years (range: 31–66 years) were evaluated. A total of 85% of patients had invasive ductal carcinoma, and 15% had invasive lobular carcinoma. The tracer uptake [SULpeak, SULavg, and the median tumor-to-background ratio (TBR)] was significantly higher in [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi than with [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT for lymph nodes, pleural metastases, and liver lesions (p < 0.05). However, for brain metastasis, only the median TBR was significantly higher (p < 0.05) compared to [(18)F]F-FDG. In patient-based analysis the sensitivity of [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi PET/CT was higher, but not significant than that of [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT in the detection of both primary tumors and metastatic lesions. According to lesion-based analysis, on diagnostic CT, 47 patients had 44 primary tumors, 248 lymph nodes, 15 pleural, 88 liver, and 42 brain metastases. [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi scan identified more abnormal lesions than [(18)F]F-FDG in all the primary and metastatic sites with a maximum marked difference in the primary site [88.6% vs. 81.8%; p-0.001], lymph nodes [89.1% vs. 83.8%; p-0.0001], pleural metastases [93.3% vs. 73%; p-0.096] and brain metastasis [100% vs. 59.5%; p-0.0001]. [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi PET/CT was superior to [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT in the imaging of breast cancers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10144331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101443312023-04-29 Head-to-Head Comparison between [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi and [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT Imaging in Patients with Breast Cancer Ballal, Sanjana Yadav, Madhav P. Roesch, Frank Wakade, Nicky Raju, Shobhana Sheokand, Parvind Mishra, Prashant Moon, Euy Sung Tripathi, Madhavi Martin, Marcel Bal, Chandrasekhar Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Article This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi with that of [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT in detecting primary and metastatic lesions of breast cancer. [(18)F]F-FDG and [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi PET/CT scans of histologically proven breast cancer patients were compared according to patient-based and lesion-based analysis. Forty-seven patients with a mean age of 44.8 ± 9.9 years (range: 31–66 years) were evaluated. A total of 85% of patients had invasive ductal carcinoma, and 15% had invasive lobular carcinoma. The tracer uptake [SULpeak, SULavg, and the median tumor-to-background ratio (TBR)] was significantly higher in [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi than with [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT for lymph nodes, pleural metastases, and liver lesions (p < 0.05). However, for brain metastasis, only the median TBR was significantly higher (p < 0.05) compared to [(18)F]F-FDG. In patient-based analysis the sensitivity of [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi PET/CT was higher, but not significant than that of [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT in the detection of both primary tumors and metastatic lesions. According to lesion-based analysis, on diagnostic CT, 47 patients had 44 primary tumors, 248 lymph nodes, 15 pleural, 88 liver, and 42 brain metastases. [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi scan identified more abnormal lesions than [(18)F]F-FDG in all the primary and metastatic sites with a maximum marked difference in the primary site [88.6% vs. 81.8%; p-0.001], lymph nodes [89.1% vs. 83.8%; p-0.0001], pleural metastases [93.3% vs. 73%; p-0.096] and brain metastasis [100% vs. 59.5%; p-0.0001]. [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi PET/CT was superior to [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT in the imaging of breast cancers. MDPI 2023-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10144331/ /pubmed/37111277 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph16040521 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ballal, Sanjana
Yadav, Madhav P.
Roesch, Frank
Wakade, Nicky
Raju, Shobhana
Sheokand, Parvind
Mishra, Prashant
Moon, Euy Sung
Tripathi, Madhavi
Martin, Marcel
Bal, Chandrasekhar
Head-to-Head Comparison between [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi and [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT Imaging in Patients with Breast Cancer
title Head-to-Head Comparison between [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi and [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT Imaging in Patients with Breast Cancer
title_full Head-to-Head Comparison between [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi and [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT Imaging in Patients with Breast Cancer
title_fullStr Head-to-Head Comparison between [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi and [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT Imaging in Patients with Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Head-to-Head Comparison between [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi and [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT Imaging in Patients with Breast Cancer
title_short Head-to-Head Comparison between [(68)Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi and [(18)F]F-FDG PET/CT Imaging in Patients with Breast Cancer
title_sort head-to-head comparison between [(68)ga]ga-dota.sa.fapi and [(18)f]f-fdg pet/ct imaging in patients with breast cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10144331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37111277
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph16040521
work_keys_str_mv AT ballalsanjana headtoheadcomparisonbetween68gagadotasafapiand18fffdgpetctimaginginpatientswithbreastcancer
AT yadavmadhavp headtoheadcomparisonbetween68gagadotasafapiand18fffdgpetctimaginginpatientswithbreastcancer
AT roeschfrank headtoheadcomparisonbetween68gagadotasafapiand18fffdgpetctimaginginpatientswithbreastcancer
AT wakadenicky headtoheadcomparisonbetween68gagadotasafapiand18fffdgpetctimaginginpatientswithbreastcancer
AT rajushobhana headtoheadcomparisonbetween68gagadotasafapiand18fffdgpetctimaginginpatientswithbreastcancer
AT sheokandparvind headtoheadcomparisonbetween68gagadotasafapiand18fffdgpetctimaginginpatientswithbreastcancer
AT mishraprashant headtoheadcomparisonbetween68gagadotasafapiand18fffdgpetctimaginginpatientswithbreastcancer
AT mooneuysung headtoheadcomparisonbetween68gagadotasafapiand18fffdgpetctimaginginpatientswithbreastcancer
AT tripathimadhavi headtoheadcomparisonbetween68gagadotasafapiand18fffdgpetctimaginginpatientswithbreastcancer
AT martinmarcel headtoheadcomparisonbetween68gagadotasafapiand18fffdgpetctimaginginpatientswithbreastcancer
AT balchandrasekhar headtoheadcomparisonbetween68gagadotasafapiand18fffdgpetctimaginginpatientswithbreastcancer