Cargando…

Stand-Alone Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) for the Treatment of Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD) after Previous Posterior Lumbar Fusion: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes and Comparison with Posterior Revision Surgery

Background: Radiological evidence of adjacent segment disease (ASD) has been reported to have a prevalence of more than 30% and several risk factors have been reported. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with symptomatic ASD treated with stand-alo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miscusi, Massimo, Trungu, Sokol, Ricciardi, Luca, Forcato, Stefano, Piazza, Amedeo, Ramieri, Alessandro, Raco, Antonino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10144531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37109321
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082985
_version_ 1785034122082648064
author Miscusi, Massimo
Trungu, Sokol
Ricciardi, Luca
Forcato, Stefano
Piazza, Amedeo
Ramieri, Alessandro
Raco, Antonino
author_facet Miscusi, Massimo
Trungu, Sokol
Ricciardi, Luca
Forcato, Stefano
Piazza, Amedeo
Ramieri, Alessandro
Raco, Antonino
author_sort Miscusi, Massimo
collection PubMed
description Background: Radiological evidence of adjacent segment disease (ASD) has been reported to have a prevalence of more than 30% and several risk factors have been reported. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with symptomatic ASD treated with stand-alone OLIF and compare results with a posterior revision surgery cohort. Methods: This is a retrospective case-control study. Clinical-patient-reported outcomes were obtained at preoperative, postoperative and final follow-up visits using the Short Form (SF-36) scale, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the visual analog scale (VAS). Radiological measures include lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch, segmental coronal Cobb angle and intervertebral disc height (DH). The data are compared with a retrospective series of patients that underwent a posterior revision surgery for ASD. Results: Twenty-eight patients in the OLIF group and 25 patients in the posterior group meet inclusion criteria. The mean ages at the time of the surgery are 65.1 years and 67.5, respectively. The mean follow-up time is 36.1 months (range of 14–56). The clinical outcomes significantly improve from preoperative values from the surgery in both groups. The radiological parameters are significantly improved postoperatively and were maintained at the last follow-up in both groups. A statistically significant difference is observed between the two groups for minor complication rate, length of surgery, blood loss and DH restoration. Conclusions: Stand-alone OLIF is an effective and safe technique with low morbidity and complication rates for the treatment of selected patients with symptomatic ASD following a previous lumbar fusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10144531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101445312023-04-29 Stand-Alone Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) for the Treatment of Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD) after Previous Posterior Lumbar Fusion: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes and Comparison with Posterior Revision Surgery Miscusi, Massimo Trungu, Sokol Ricciardi, Luca Forcato, Stefano Piazza, Amedeo Ramieri, Alessandro Raco, Antonino J Clin Med Article Background: Radiological evidence of adjacent segment disease (ASD) has been reported to have a prevalence of more than 30% and several risk factors have been reported. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with symptomatic ASD treated with stand-alone OLIF and compare results with a posterior revision surgery cohort. Methods: This is a retrospective case-control study. Clinical-patient-reported outcomes were obtained at preoperative, postoperative and final follow-up visits using the Short Form (SF-36) scale, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the visual analog scale (VAS). Radiological measures include lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch, segmental coronal Cobb angle and intervertebral disc height (DH). The data are compared with a retrospective series of patients that underwent a posterior revision surgery for ASD. Results: Twenty-eight patients in the OLIF group and 25 patients in the posterior group meet inclusion criteria. The mean ages at the time of the surgery are 65.1 years and 67.5, respectively. The mean follow-up time is 36.1 months (range of 14–56). The clinical outcomes significantly improve from preoperative values from the surgery in both groups. The radiological parameters are significantly improved postoperatively and were maintained at the last follow-up in both groups. A statistically significant difference is observed between the two groups for minor complication rate, length of surgery, blood loss and DH restoration. Conclusions: Stand-alone OLIF is an effective and safe technique with low morbidity and complication rates for the treatment of selected patients with symptomatic ASD following a previous lumbar fusion. MDPI 2023-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC10144531/ /pubmed/37109321 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082985 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Miscusi, Massimo
Trungu, Sokol
Ricciardi, Luca
Forcato, Stefano
Piazza, Amedeo
Ramieri, Alessandro
Raco, Antonino
Stand-Alone Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) for the Treatment of Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD) after Previous Posterior Lumbar Fusion: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes and Comparison with Posterior Revision Surgery
title Stand-Alone Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) for the Treatment of Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD) after Previous Posterior Lumbar Fusion: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes and Comparison with Posterior Revision Surgery
title_full Stand-Alone Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) for the Treatment of Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD) after Previous Posterior Lumbar Fusion: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes and Comparison with Posterior Revision Surgery
title_fullStr Stand-Alone Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) for the Treatment of Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD) after Previous Posterior Lumbar Fusion: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes and Comparison with Posterior Revision Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Stand-Alone Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) for the Treatment of Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD) after Previous Posterior Lumbar Fusion: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes and Comparison with Posterior Revision Surgery
title_short Stand-Alone Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) for the Treatment of Adjacent Segment Disease (ASD) after Previous Posterior Lumbar Fusion: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes and Comparison with Posterior Revision Surgery
title_sort stand-alone oblique lumbar interbody fusion (olif) for the treatment of adjacent segment disease (asd) after previous posterior lumbar fusion: clinical and radiological outcomes and comparison with posterior revision surgery
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10144531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37109321
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082985
work_keys_str_mv AT miscusimassimo standaloneobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionolifforthetreatmentofadjacentsegmentdiseaseasdafterpreviousposteriorlumbarfusionclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesandcomparisonwithposteriorrevisionsurgery
AT trungusokol standaloneobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionolifforthetreatmentofadjacentsegmentdiseaseasdafterpreviousposteriorlumbarfusionclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesandcomparisonwithposteriorrevisionsurgery
AT ricciardiluca standaloneobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionolifforthetreatmentofadjacentsegmentdiseaseasdafterpreviousposteriorlumbarfusionclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesandcomparisonwithposteriorrevisionsurgery
AT forcatostefano standaloneobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionolifforthetreatmentofadjacentsegmentdiseaseasdafterpreviousposteriorlumbarfusionclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesandcomparisonwithposteriorrevisionsurgery
AT piazzaamedeo standaloneobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionolifforthetreatmentofadjacentsegmentdiseaseasdafterpreviousposteriorlumbarfusionclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesandcomparisonwithposteriorrevisionsurgery
AT ramierialessandro standaloneobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionolifforthetreatmentofadjacentsegmentdiseaseasdafterpreviousposteriorlumbarfusionclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesandcomparisonwithposteriorrevisionsurgery
AT racoantonino standaloneobliquelumbarinterbodyfusionolifforthetreatmentofadjacentsegmentdiseaseasdafterpreviousposteriorlumbarfusionclinicalandradiologicaloutcomesandcomparisonwithposteriorrevisionsurgery