Cargando…

Multi-Objective Optimization Design and Performance Comparison of Magnetorheological Torsional Vibration Absorbers of Different Configurations

The purpose of this study is to provide a convenient optimization design method for magnetorheological torsional vibration absorbers (MR-TVA) suitable for automotive engines, which is a damper matching design method that takes into account the needs of the engine operating conditions. In this study,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Guisheng, Hu, Hongsheng, Ouyang, Qing, Zhang, Feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10144781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37110006
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16083170
_version_ 1785034176009863168
author Liu, Guisheng
Hu, Hongsheng
Ouyang, Qing
Zhang, Feng
author_facet Liu, Guisheng
Hu, Hongsheng
Ouyang, Qing
Zhang, Feng
author_sort Liu, Guisheng
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study is to provide a convenient optimization design method for magnetorheological torsional vibration absorbers (MR-TVA) suitable for automotive engines, which is a damper matching design method that takes into account the needs of the engine operating conditions. In this study, three kinds of MR-TVA with certain characteristics and applicability are proposed: axial single-coil configuration, axial multi-coil configuration and circumferential configuration. The magnetic circuit model, damping torque model and response time model of MR-TVA are established. Then, under the constraints of weight, size and inertia ratio, according to different torsional vibration conditions, the MR-TVA mass, damping torque and response time are multi-objective optimized in two directions. The optimal configurations of the three configurations are obtained from the intersection of the two optimal solutions, and the performance of the optimized MR-TVA is compared and analyzed. The results show that the axial multi-coil structure has large damping torque and the shortest response time (140 ms), which is suitable for complex working conditions. The damping torque of the axial single coil structure is generally large (207.05 N.m), which is suitable for heavy load conditions. The circumferential structure has a minimum mass (11.03 kg) and is suitable for light load conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10144781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101447812023-04-29 Multi-Objective Optimization Design and Performance Comparison of Magnetorheological Torsional Vibration Absorbers of Different Configurations Liu, Guisheng Hu, Hongsheng Ouyang, Qing Zhang, Feng Materials (Basel) Article The purpose of this study is to provide a convenient optimization design method for magnetorheological torsional vibration absorbers (MR-TVA) suitable for automotive engines, which is a damper matching design method that takes into account the needs of the engine operating conditions. In this study, three kinds of MR-TVA with certain characteristics and applicability are proposed: axial single-coil configuration, axial multi-coil configuration and circumferential configuration. The magnetic circuit model, damping torque model and response time model of MR-TVA are established. Then, under the constraints of weight, size and inertia ratio, according to different torsional vibration conditions, the MR-TVA mass, damping torque and response time are multi-objective optimized in two directions. The optimal configurations of the three configurations are obtained from the intersection of the two optimal solutions, and the performance of the optimized MR-TVA is compared and analyzed. The results show that the axial multi-coil structure has large damping torque and the shortest response time (140 ms), which is suitable for complex working conditions. The damping torque of the axial single coil structure is generally large (207.05 N.m), which is suitable for heavy load conditions. The circumferential structure has a minimum mass (11.03 kg) and is suitable for light load conditions. MDPI 2023-04-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10144781/ /pubmed/37110006 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16083170 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Liu, Guisheng
Hu, Hongsheng
Ouyang, Qing
Zhang, Feng
Multi-Objective Optimization Design and Performance Comparison of Magnetorheological Torsional Vibration Absorbers of Different Configurations
title Multi-Objective Optimization Design and Performance Comparison of Magnetorheological Torsional Vibration Absorbers of Different Configurations
title_full Multi-Objective Optimization Design and Performance Comparison of Magnetorheological Torsional Vibration Absorbers of Different Configurations
title_fullStr Multi-Objective Optimization Design and Performance Comparison of Magnetorheological Torsional Vibration Absorbers of Different Configurations
title_full_unstemmed Multi-Objective Optimization Design and Performance Comparison of Magnetorheological Torsional Vibration Absorbers of Different Configurations
title_short Multi-Objective Optimization Design and Performance Comparison of Magnetorheological Torsional Vibration Absorbers of Different Configurations
title_sort multi-objective optimization design and performance comparison of magnetorheological torsional vibration absorbers of different configurations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10144781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37110006
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16083170
work_keys_str_mv AT liuguisheng multiobjectiveoptimizationdesignandperformancecomparisonofmagnetorheologicaltorsionalvibrationabsorbersofdifferentconfigurations
AT huhongsheng multiobjectiveoptimizationdesignandperformancecomparisonofmagnetorheologicaltorsionalvibrationabsorbersofdifferentconfigurations
AT ouyangqing multiobjectiveoptimizationdesignandperformancecomparisonofmagnetorheologicaltorsionalvibrationabsorbersofdifferentconfigurations
AT zhangfeng multiobjectiveoptimizationdesignandperformancecomparisonofmagnetorheologicaltorsionalvibrationabsorbersofdifferentconfigurations