Cargando…
Making CT Dose Monitoring Meaningful: Augmenting Dose with Imaging Quality
Due to the concerns about radiation dose associated with medical imaging, radiation dose monitoring systems (RDMSs) are now utilized by many radiology providers to collect, process, analyze, and manage radiation dose-related information. Currently, most commercially available RDMSs focus only on rad...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10145563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37104136 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography9020065 |
_version_ | 1785034363610595328 |
---|---|
author | Alsaihati, Njood Ria, Francesco Solomon, Justin Ding, Aiping Frush, Donald Samei, Ehsan |
author_facet | Alsaihati, Njood Ria, Francesco Solomon, Justin Ding, Aiping Frush, Donald Samei, Ehsan |
author_sort | Alsaihati, Njood |
collection | PubMed |
description | Due to the concerns about radiation dose associated with medical imaging, radiation dose monitoring systems (RDMSs) are now utilized by many radiology providers to collect, process, analyze, and manage radiation dose-related information. Currently, most commercially available RDMSs focus only on radiation dose information and do not track any metrics related to image quality. However, to enable comprehensive patient-based imaging optimization, it is equally important to monitor image quality as well. This article describes how RDMS design can be extended beyond radiation dose to simultaneously monitor image quality. A newly designed interface was evaluated by different groups of radiology professionals (radiologists, technologists, and physicists) on a Likert scale. The results show that the new design is effective in assessing both image quality and safety in clinical practices, with an overall average score of 7.8 out of 10.0 and scores ranging from 5.5 to 10.0. Radiologists rated the interface highest at 8.4 out of 10.0, followed by technologists at 7.6 out of 10.0, and medical physicists at 7.5 out of 10.0. This work demonstrates how the assessment of the radiation dose can be performed in conjunction with the image quality using customizable user interfaces based on the clinical needs associated with different radiology professions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10145563 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101455632023-04-29 Making CT Dose Monitoring Meaningful: Augmenting Dose with Imaging Quality Alsaihati, Njood Ria, Francesco Solomon, Justin Ding, Aiping Frush, Donald Samei, Ehsan Tomography Article Due to the concerns about radiation dose associated with medical imaging, radiation dose monitoring systems (RDMSs) are now utilized by many radiology providers to collect, process, analyze, and manage radiation dose-related information. Currently, most commercially available RDMSs focus only on radiation dose information and do not track any metrics related to image quality. However, to enable comprehensive patient-based imaging optimization, it is equally important to monitor image quality as well. This article describes how RDMS design can be extended beyond radiation dose to simultaneously monitor image quality. A newly designed interface was evaluated by different groups of radiology professionals (radiologists, technologists, and physicists) on a Likert scale. The results show that the new design is effective in assessing both image quality and safety in clinical practices, with an overall average score of 7.8 out of 10.0 and scores ranging from 5.5 to 10.0. Radiologists rated the interface highest at 8.4 out of 10.0, followed by technologists at 7.6 out of 10.0, and medical physicists at 7.5 out of 10.0. This work demonstrates how the assessment of the radiation dose can be performed in conjunction with the image quality using customizable user interfaces based on the clinical needs associated with different radiology professions. MDPI 2023-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10145563/ /pubmed/37104136 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography9020065 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Alsaihati, Njood Ria, Francesco Solomon, Justin Ding, Aiping Frush, Donald Samei, Ehsan Making CT Dose Monitoring Meaningful: Augmenting Dose with Imaging Quality |
title | Making CT Dose Monitoring Meaningful: Augmenting Dose with Imaging Quality |
title_full | Making CT Dose Monitoring Meaningful: Augmenting Dose with Imaging Quality |
title_fullStr | Making CT Dose Monitoring Meaningful: Augmenting Dose with Imaging Quality |
title_full_unstemmed | Making CT Dose Monitoring Meaningful: Augmenting Dose with Imaging Quality |
title_short | Making CT Dose Monitoring Meaningful: Augmenting Dose with Imaging Quality |
title_sort | making ct dose monitoring meaningful: augmenting dose with imaging quality |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10145563/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37104136 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/tomography9020065 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alsaihatinjood makingctdosemonitoringmeaningfulaugmentingdosewithimagingquality AT riafrancesco makingctdosemonitoringmeaningfulaugmentingdosewithimagingquality AT solomonjustin makingctdosemonitoringmeaningfulaugmentingdosewithimagingquality AT dingaiping makingctdosemonitoringmeaningfulaugmentingdosewithimagingquality AT frushdonald makingctdosemonitoringmeaningfulaugmentingdosewithimagingquality AT sameiehsan makingctdosemonitoringmeaningfulaugmentingdosewithimagingquality |