Cargando…
Lactobacillus Bacteremia and Probiotics: A Review
Lactobacilli are widely found in nature, are commensal microbes in humans, and are commonly used as probiotics. Concerns about probiotic safety have arisen due to reports of bacteremia and other Lactobacillus-associated infections. We reviewed the literature for articles on the pathogenicity of Lact...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10145752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37110319 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11040896 |
_version_ | 1785034412282347520 |
---|---|
author | Kullar, Ravina Goldstein, Ellie J. C. Johnson, Stuart McFarland, Lynne V. |
author_facet | Kullar, Ravina Goldstein, Ellie J. C. Johnson, Stuart McFarland, Lynne V. |
author_sort | Kullar, Ravina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lactobacilli are widely found in nature, are commensal microbes in humans, and are commonly used as probiotics. Concerns about probiotic safety have arisen due to reports of bacteremia and other Lactobacillus-associated infections. We reviewed the literature for articles on the pathogenicity of Lactobacillus spp. bacteremia and reports of probiotics in these patients. Our aim is to review these articles and update the present knowledge on the epidemiology of Lactobacillus spp. bacteremia and determine the role of probiotics in Lactobacillus bacteremia. Lactobacillus bacteremia is infrequent but has a higher risk of mortality and risk factors, including severe underlying diseases, immune system suppression, admission to intensive care units, and use of central venous catheters. A variety of Lactobacillus species may cause bacteremia and may or may not be associated with probiotic exposure. To determine if oral probiotics are the source of these infections, the blood isolates and the oral probiotic strain(s) must be compared by sensitive identification methods. The prevalence of Lactobacillus bacteremia is infrequent but is more common in patients taking probiotics compared to those not taking probiotics. Three probiotics (Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, and Lacticaseibacillus paracasei) were directly linked with blood isolates from bacteremia patients using molecular identification assays. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10145752 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101457522023-04-29 Lactobacillus Bacteremia and Probiotics: A Review Kullar, Ravina Goldstein, Ellie J. C. Johnson, Stuart McFarland, Lynne V. Microorganisms Review Lactobacilli are widely found in nature, are commensal microbes in humans, and are commonly used as probiotics. Concerns about probiotic safety have arisen due to reports of bacteremia and other Lactobacillus-associated infections. We reviewed the literature for articles on the pathogenicity of Lactobacillus spp. bacteremia and reports of probiotics in these patients. Our aim is to review these articles and update the present knowledge on the epidemiology of Lactobacillus spp. bacteremia and determine the role of probiotics in Lactobacillus bacteremia. Lactobacillus bacteremia is infrequent but has a higher risk of mortality and risk factors, including severe underlying diseases, immune system suppression, admission to intensive care units, and use of central venous catheters. A variety of Lactobacillus species may cause bacteremia and may or may not be associated with probiotic exposure. To determine if oral probiotics are the source of these infections, the blood isolates and the oral probiotic strain(s) must be compared by sensitive identification methods. The prevalence of Lactobacillus bacteremia is infrequent but is more common in patients taking probiotics compared to those not taking probiotics. Three probiotics (Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, and Lacticaseibacillus paracasei) were directly linked with blood isolates from bacteremia patients using molecular identification assays. MDPI 2023-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10145752/ /pubmed/37110319 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11040896 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Kullar, Ravina Goldstein, Ellie J. C. Johnson, Stuart McFarland, Lynne V. Lactobacillus Bacteremia and Probiotics: A Review |
title | Lactobacillus Bacteremia and Probiotics: A Review |
title_full | Lactobacillus Bacteremia and Probiotics: A Review |
title_fullStr | Lactobacillus Bacteremia and Probiotics: A Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Lactobacillus Bacteremia and Probiotics: A Review |
title_short | Lactobacillus Bacteremia and Probiotics: A Review |
title_sort | lactobacillus bacteremia and probiotics: a review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10145752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37110319 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11040896 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kullarravina lactobacillusbacteremiaandprobioticsareview AT goldsteinelliejc lactobacillusbacteremiaandprobioticsareview AT johnsonstuart lactobacillusbacteremiaandprobioticsareview AT mcfarlandlynnev lactobacillusbacteremiaandprobioticsareview |