Cargando…

Do the Mechanical Properties of Calcium-Silicate-Based Cements Influence the Stress Distribution of Different Retrograde Cavity Preparations?

The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of the mechanical properties of three different calcium-silicate-based cements on the stress distribution of three different retrograde cavity preparations. Biodentine™ “BD”, MTA Biorep “BR”, and Well-Root™ PT “WR” were used. The compress...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ashi, Tarek, Richert, Raphaël, Mancino, Davide, Jmal, Hamdi, Alkhouri, Sleman, Addiego, Frédéric, Kharouf, Naji, Haïkel, Youssef
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10145818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37109947
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16083111
_version_ 1785034429256695808
author Ashi, Tarek
Richert, Raphaël
Mancino, Davide
Jmal, Hamdi
Alkhouri, Sleman
Addiego, Frédéric
Kharouf, Naji
Haïkel, Youssef
author_facet Ashi, Tarek
Richert, Raphaël
Mancino, Davide
Jmal, Hamdi
Alkhouri, Sleman
Addiego, Frédéric
Kharouf, Naji
Haïkel, Youssef
author_sort Ashi, Tarek
collection PubMed
description The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of the mechanical properties of three different calcium-silicate-based cements on the stress distribution of three different retrograde cavity preparations. Biodentine™ “BD”, MTA Biorep “BR”, and Well-Root™ PT “WR” were used. The compression strengths of ten cylindrical samples of each material were tested. The porosity of each cement was investigated by using micro-computed X-ray tomography. Finite element analysis (FEA) was used to simulate three retrograde conical cavity preparations with an apical diameter of 1 mm (Tip I), 1.4 mm (Tip II), and 1.8 mm (Tip III) after an apical 3 mm resection. BR demonstrated the lowest compression strength values (17.6 ± 5.5 MPa) and porosity percentages (0.57 ± 0.14%) compared to BD (80 ± 17 MPa–1.22 ± 0.31%) and WR (90 ± 22 MPa–1.93 ± 0.12%) (p < 0.05). FEA demonstrated that the larger cavity preparation demonstrated higher stress distribution in the root whereas stiffer cement demonstrated lower stress in the root but higher stress in the material. We can conclude that a respected root end preparation associated with cement with good stiffness could offer optimal endodontic microsurgery. Further studies are needed to define the adapted cavity diameter and cement stiffness in order to have optimal mechanical resistance with less stress distribution in the root.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10145818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101458182023-04-29 Do the Mechanical Properties of Calcium-Silicate-Based Cements Influence the Stress Distribution of Different Retrograde Cavity Preparations? Ashi, Tarek Richert, Raphaël Mancino, Davide Jmal, Hamdi Alkhouri, Sleman Addiego, Frédéric Kharouf, Naji Haïkel, Youssef Materials (Basel) Article The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of the mechanical properties of three different calcium-silicate-based cements on the stress distribution of three different retrograde cavity preparations. Biodentine™ “BD”, MTA Biorep “BR”, and Well-Root™ PT “WR” were used. The compression strengths of ten cylindrical samples of each material were tested. The porosity of each cement was investigated by using micro-computed X-ray tomography. Finite element analysis (FEA) was used to simulate three retrograde conical cavity preparations with an apical diameter of 1 mm (Tip I), 1.4 mm (Tip II), and 1.8 mm (Tip III) after an apical 3 mm resection. BR demonstrated the lowest compression strength values (17.6 ± 5.5 MPa) and porosity percentages (0.57 ± 0.14%) compared to BD (80 ± 17 MPa–1.22 ± 0.31%) and WR (90 ± 22 MPa–1.93 ± 0.12%) (p < 0.05). FEA demonstrated that the larger cavity preparation demonstrated higher stress distribution in the root whereas stiffer cement demonstrated lower stress in the root but higher stress in the material. We can conclude that a respected root end preparation associated with cement with good stiffness could offer optimal endodontic microsurgery. Further studies are needed to define the adapted cavity diameter and cement stiffness in order to have optimal mechanical resistance with less stress distribution in the root. MDPI 2023-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10145818/ /pubmed/37109947 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16083111 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ashi, Tarek
Richert, Raphaël
Mancino, Davide
Jmal, Hamdi
Alkhouri, Sleman
Addiego, Frédéric
Kharouf, Naji
Haïkel, Youssef
Do the Mechanical Properties of Calcium-Silicate-Based Cements Influence the Stress Distribution of Different Retrograde Cavity Preparations?
title Do the Mechanical Properties of Calcium-Silicate-Based Cements Influence the Stress Distribution of Different Retrograde Cavity Preparations?
title_full Do the Mechanical Properties of Calcium-Silicate-Based Cements Influence the Stress Distribution of Different Retrograde Cavity Preparations?
title_fullStr Do the Mechanical Properties of Calcium-Silicate-Based Cements Influence the Stress Distribution of Different Retrograde Cavity Preparations?
title_full_unstemmed Do the Mechanical Properties of Calcium-Silicate-Based Cements Influence the Stress Distribution of Different Retrograde Cavity Preparations?
title_short Do the Mechanical Properties of Calcium-Silicate-Based Cements Influence the Stress Distribution of Different Retrograde Cavity Preparations?
title_sort do the mechanical properties of calcium-silicate-based cements influence the stress distribution of different retrograde cavity preparations?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10145818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37109947
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16083111
work_keys_str_mv AT ashitarek dothemechanicalpropertiesofcalciumsilicatebasedcementsinfluencethestressdistributionofdifferentretrogradecavitypreparations
AT richertraphael dothemechanicalpropertiesofcalciumsilicatebasedcementsinfluencethestressdistributionofdifferentretrogradecavitypreparations
AT mancinodavide dothemechanicalpropertiesofcalciumsilicatebasedcementsinfluencethestressdistributionofdifferentretrogradecavitypreparations
AT jmalhamdi dothemechanicalpropertiesofcalciumsilicatebasedcementsinfluencethestressdistributionofdifferentretrogradecavitypreparations
AT alkhourisleman dothemechanicalpropertiesofcalciumsilicatebasedcementsinfluencethestressdistributionofdifferentretrogradecavitypreparations
AT addiegofrederic dothemechanicalpropertiesofcalciumsilicatebasedcementsinfluencethestressdistributionofdifferentretrogradecavitypreparations
AT kharoufnaji dothemechanicalpropertiesofcalciumsilicatebasedcementsinfluencethestressdistributionofdifferentretrogradecavitypreparations
AT haikelyoussef dothemechanicalpropertiesofcalciumsilicatebasedcementsinfluencethestressdistributionofdifferentretrogradecavitypreparations