Cargando…

Learning-Based Approaches to Current Identification from Magnetic Sensors

Direct measurement of electric currents can be prevented by poor accessibility or prohibitive technical conditions. In such cases, magnetic sensors can be used to measure the field in regions adjacent to the sources, and the measured data then can be used to estimate source currents. Unfortunately,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barmada, Sami, Di Barba, Paolo, Formisano, Alessandro, Mognaschi, Maria Evelina, Tucci, Mauro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10146113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37112172
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23083832
_version_ 1785034503188643840
author Barmada, Sami
Di Barba, Paolo
Formisano, Alessandro
Mognaschi, Maria Evelina
Tucci, Mauro
author_facet Barmada, Sami
Di Barba, Paolo
Formisano, Alessandro
Mognaschi, Maria Evelina
Tucci, Mauro
author_sort Barmada, Sami
collection PubMed
description Direct measurement of electric currents can be prevented by poor accessibility or prohibitive technical conditions. In such cases, magnetic sensors can be used to measure the field in regions adjacent to the sources, and the measured data then can be used to estimate source currents. Unfortunately, this is classified as an Electromagnetic Inverse Problem (EIP), and data from sensors must be cautiously treated to obtain meaningful current measurements. The usual approach requires using suited regularization schemes. On the other hand, behavioral approaches are recently spreading for this class of problems. The reconstructed model is not obliged to follow the physics equations, and this implies approximations which must be accurately controlled, especially if aiming to reconstruct an inverse model from examples. In this paper, a systematic study of the role of different learning parameters (or rules) on the (re-)construction of an EIP model is proposed, in comparison with more assessed regularization techniques. Attention is particularly devoted to linear EIPs, and in this class, a benchmark problem is used to illustrate in practice the results. It is shown that, by applying classical regularization methods and analogous correcting actions in behavioral models, similar results can be obtained. Both classical methodologies and neural approaches are described and compared in the paper.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10146113
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101461132023-04-29 Learning-Based Approaches to Current Identification from Magnetic Sensors Barmada, Sami Di Barba, Paolo Formisano, Alessandro Mognaschi, Maria Evelina Tucci, Mauro Sensors (Basel) Article Direct measurement of electric currents can be prevented by poor accessibility or prohibitive technical conditions. In such cases, magnetic sensors can be used to measure the field in regions adjacent to the sources, and the measured data then can be used to estimate source currents. Unfortunately, this is classified as an Electromagnetic Inverse Problem (EIP), and data from sensors must be cautiously treated to obtain meaningful current measurements. The usual approach requires using suited regularization schemes. On the other hand, behavioral approaches are recently spreading for this class of problems. The reconstructed model is not obliged to follow the physics equations, and this implies approximations which must be accurately controlled, especially if aiming to reconstruct an inverse model from examples. In this paper, a systematic study of the role of different learning parameters (or rules) on the (re-)construction of an EIP model is proposed, in comparison with more assessed regularization techniques. Attention is particularly devoted to linear EIPs, and in this class, a benchmark problem is used to illustrate in practice the results. It is shown that, by applying classical regularization methods and analogous correcting actions in behavioral models, similar results can be obtained. Both classical methodologies and neural approaches are described and compared in the paper. MDPI 2023-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC10146113/ /pubmed/37112172 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23083832 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Barmada, Sami
Di Barba, Paolo
Formisano, Alessandro
Mognaschi, Maria Evelina
Tucci, Mauro
Learning-Based Approaches to Current Identification from Magnetic Sensors
title Learning-Based Approaches to Current Identification from Magnetic Sensors
title_full Learning-Based Approaches to Current Identification from Magnetic Sensors
title_fullStr Learning-Based Approaches to Current Identification from Magnetic Sensors
title_full_unstemmed Learning-Based Approaches to Current Identification from Magnetic Sensors
title_short Learning-Based Approaches to Current Identification from Magnetic Sensors
title_sort learning-based approaches to current identification from magnetic sensors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10146113/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37112172
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23083832
work_keys_str_mv AT barmadasami learningbasedapproachestocurrentidentificationfrommagneticsensors
AT dibarbapaolo learningbasedapproachestocurrentidentificationfrommagneticsensors
AT formisanoalessandro learningbasedapproachestocurrentidentificationfrommagneticsensors
AT mognaschimariaevelina learningbasedapproachestocurrentidentificationfrommagneticsensors
AT tuccimauro learningbasedapproachestocurrentidentificationfrommagneticsensors