Cargando…

Lack of effectiveness of Bebtelovimab monoclonal antibody among high-risk patients with SARS-Cov-2 Omicron during BA.2, BA.2.12.1 and BA.5 subvariants dominated era

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron subvariants are expected to be resistant to Bebtelovimab (BEB) monoclonal antibody (MAb) and the real-world experience regarding its effectiveness is scarce. This retrospective cohort study reports a data analysis in Banner Healthc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sridhara, Srilekha, Gungor, Ahmet B., Erol, Halil K., Al-Obaidi, Mohanad, Zangeneh, Tirdad T., Bedrick, Edward J., Ariyamuthu, Venkatesh K., Shetty, Aneesha, Qannus, Abd A., Mendoza, Katherine, Murugapandian, Sangeetha, Gupta, Gaurav, Tanriover, Bekir
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10146441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37115780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279326
_version_ 1785034582068822016
author Sridhara, Srilekha
Gungor, Ahmet B.
Erol, Halil K.
Al-Obaidi, Mohanad
Zangeneh, Tirdad T.
Bedrick, Edward J.
Ariyamuthu, Venkatesh K.
Shetty, Aneesha
Qannus, Abd A.
Mendoza, Katherine
Murugapandian, Sangeetha
Gupta, Gaurav
Tanriover, Bekir
author_facet Sridhara, Srilekha
Gungor, Ahmet B.
Erol, Halil K.
Al-Obaidi, Mohanad
Zangeneh, Tirdad T.
Bedrick, Edward J.
Ariyamuthu, Venkatesh K.
Shetty, Aneesha
Qannus, Abd A.
Mendoza, Katherine
Murugapandian, Sangeetha
Gupta, Gaurav
Tanriover, Bekir
author_sort Sridhara, Srilekha
collection PubMed
description Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron subvariants are expected to be resistant to Bebtelovimab (BEB) monoclonal antibody (MAb) and the real-world experience regarding its effectiveness is scarce. This retrospective cohort study reports a data analysis in Banner Healthcare System (a large not-for-profit organization) between 4/5/2022 and 8/1/2022 and included 19,778 Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) positive (by PCR or direct antigen testing) patients who were selected from Cerner-Electronic Health Record after the exclusions criteria were met. The study index date for cohort was determined as the date of BEB MAb administration or the date of the first positive COVID-19 testing. The cohort consist of COVID-19 infected patients who received BEB MAb (N = 1,091) compared to propensity score (PS) matched control (N = 1,091). The primary composite outcome was the incidence of 30-day all-cause hospitalization and/or mortality. All statistical analyses were conducted on the paired (matched) dataset. For the primary composite outcome, the event counts and percentages were reported. Ninety-five percent Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals for percentages were computed. The study cohorts were 1:1 propensity matched without replacement across 26 covariates using an optimal matching algorithm that minimizes the sum of absolute pairwise distance across the matched sample after fitting and using logistic regression as the distance function. The pairs were matched exactly on patient vaccination status, BMI group, age group and diabetes status. Compared to the PS matched control group (2.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7%, 3.7%), BEB MAb use (2.2%; 95% CI: 1.4%, 3.3%) did not significantly reduce the incidence of the primary outcome (p = 0.67). In the subgroup analysis, we observed similar no-difference trends regarding the primary outcomes for the propensity rematched BEB MAb treated and untreated groups, stratified by patient vaccination status, age (<65 years or ≥65), and immunocompromised status (patients with HIV/AIDS or solid organ transplants or malignancy including lymphoproliferative disorder). The number needed to treat (1/0.026–0.022) with BEB MAb was 250 to avoid one hospitalization and/or death over 30 days. The BEB MAb use lacked efficacy in patients with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants (mainly BA.2, BA.2.12.1, and BA.5) in the Banner Healthcare System in the Southwestern United States.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10146441
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101464412023-04-29 Lack of effectiveness of Bebtelovimab monoclonal antibody among high-risk patients with SARS-Cov-2 Omicron during BA.2, BA.2.12.1 and BA.5 subvariants dominated era Sridhara, Srilekha Gungor, Ahmet B. Erol, Halil K. Al-Obaidi, Mohanad Zangeneh, Tirdad T. Bedrick, Edward J. Ariyamuthu, Venkatesh K. Shetty, Aneesha Qannus, Abd A. Mendoza, Katherine Murugapandian, Sangeetha Gupta, Gaurav Tanriover, Bekir PLoS One Research Article Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron subvariants are expected to be resistant to Bebtelovimab (BEB) monoclonal antibody (MAb) and the real-world experience regarding its effectiveness is scarce. This retrospective cohort study reports a data analysis in Banner Healthcare System (a large not-for-profit organization) between 4/5/2022 and 8/1/2022 and included 19,778 Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) positive (by PCR or direct antigen testing) patients who were selected from Cerner-Electronic Health Record after the exclusions criteria were met. The study index date for cohort was determined as the date of BEB MAb administration or the date of the first positive COVID-19 testing. The cohort consist of COVID-19 infected patients who received BEB MAb (N = 1,091) compared to propensity score (PS) matched control (N = 1,091). The primary composite outcome was the incidence of 30-day all-cause hospitalization and/or mortality. All statistical analyses were conducted on the paired (matched) dataset. For the primary composite outcome, the event counts and percentages were reported. Ninety-five percent Clopper-Pearson confidence intervals for percentages were computed. The study cohorts were 1:1 propensity matched without replacement across 26 covariates using an optimal matching algorithm that minimizes the sum of absolute pairwise distance across the matched sample after fitting and using logistic regression as the distance function. The pairs were matched exactly on patient vaccination status, BMI group, age group and diabetes status. Compared to the PS matched control group (2.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7%, 3.7%), BEB MAb use (2.2%; 95% CI: 1.4%, 3.3%) did not significantly reduce the incidence of the primary outcome (p = 0.67). In the subgroup analysis, we observed similar no-difference trends regarding the primary outcomes for the propensity rematched BEB MAb treated and untreated groups, stratified by patient vaccination status, age (<65 years or ≥65), and immunocompromised status (patients with HIV/AIDS or solid organ transplants or malignancy including lymphoproliferative disorder). The number needed to treat (1/0.026–0.022) with BEB MAb was 250 to avoid one hospitalization and/or death over 30 days. The BEB MAb use lacked efficacy in patients with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants (mainly BA.2, BA.2.12.1, and BA.5) in the Banner Healthcare System in the Southwestern United States. Public Library of Science 2023-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10146441/ /pubmed/37115780 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279326 Text en © 2023 Sridhara et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sridhara, Srilekha
Gungor, Ahmet B.
Erol, Halil K.
Al-Obaidi, Mohanad
Zangeneh, Tirdad T.
Bedrick, Edward J.
Ariyamuthu, Venkatesh K.
Shetty, Aneesha
Qannus, Abd A.
Mendoza, Katherine
Murugapandian, Sangeetha
Gupta, Gaurav
Tanriover, Bekir
Lack of effectiveness of Bebtelovimab monoclonal antibody among high-risk patients with SARS-Cov-2 Omicron during BA.2, BA.2.12.1 and BA.5 subvariants dominated era
title Lack of effectiveness of Bebtelovimab monoclonal antibody among high-risk patients with SARS-Cov-2 Omicron during BA.2, BA.2.12.1 and BA.5 subvariants dominated era
title_full Lack of effectiveness of Bebtelovimab monoclonal antibody among high-risk patients with SARS-Cov-2 Omicron during BA.2, BA.2.12.1 and BA.5 subvariants dominated era
title_fullStr Lack of effectiveness of Bebtelovimab monoclonal antibody among high-risk patients with SARS-Cov-2 Omicron during BA.2, BA.2.12.1 and BA.5 subvariants dominated era
title_full_unstemmed Lack of effectiveness of Bebtelovimab monoclonal antibody among high-risk patients with SARS-Cov-2 Omicron during BA.2, BA.2.12.1 and BA.5 subvariants dominated era
title_short Lack of effectiveness of Bebtelovimab monoclonal antibody among high-risk patients with SARS-Cov-2 Omicron during BA.2, BA.2.12.1 and BA.5 subvariants dominated era
title_sort lack of effectiveness of bebtelovimab monoclonal antibody among high-risk patients with sars-cov-2 omicron during ba.2, ba.2.12.1 and ba.5 subvariants dominated era
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10146441/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37115780
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279326
work_keys_str_mv AT sridharasrilekha lackofeffectivenessofbebtelovimabmonoclonalantibodyamonghighriskpatientswithsarscov2omicronduringba2ba2121andba5subvariantsdominatedera
AT gungorahmetb lackofeffectivenessofbebtelovimabmonoclonalantibodyamonghighriskpatientswithsarscov2omicronduringba2ba2121andba5subvariantsdominatedera
AT erolhalilk lackofeffectivenessofbebtelovimabmonoclonalantibodyamonghighriskpatientswithsarscov2omicronduringba2ba2121andba5subvariantsdominatedera
AT alobaidimohanad lackofeffectivenessofbebtelovimabmonoclonalantibodyamonghighriskpatientswithsarscov2omicronduringba2ba2121andba5subvariantsdominatedera
AT zangenehtirdadt lackofeffectivenessofbebtelovimabmonoclonalantibodyamonghighriskpatientswithsarscov2omicronduringba2ba2121andba5subvariantsdominatedera
AT bedrickedwardj lackofeffectivenessofbebtelovimabmonoclonalantibodyamonghighriskpatientswithsarscov2omicronduringba2ba2121andba5subvariantsdominatedera
AT ariyamuthuvenkateshk lackofeffectivenessofbebtelovimabmonoclonalantibodyamonghighriskpatientswithsarscov2omicronduringba2ba2121andba5subvariantsdominatedera
AT shettyaneesha lackofeffectivenessofbebtelovimabmonoclonalantibodyamonghighriskpatientswithsarscov2omicronduringba2ba2121andba5subvariantsdominatedera
AT qannusabda lackofeffectivenessofbebtelovimabmonoclonalantibodyamonghighriskpatientswithsarscov2omicronduringba2ba2121andba5subvariantsdominatedera
AT mendozakatherine lackofeffectivenessofbebtelovimabmonoclonalantibodyamonghighriskpatientswithsarscov2omicronduringba2ba2121andba5subvariantsdominatedera
AT murugapandiansangeetha lackofeffectivenessofbebtelovimabmonoclonalantibodyamonghighriskpatientswithsarscov2omicronduringba2ba2121andba5subvariantsdominatedera
AT guptagaurav lackofeffectivenessofbebtelovimabmonoclonalantibodyamonghighriskpatientswithsarscov2omicronduringba2ba2121andba5subvariantsdominatedera
AT tanrioverbekir lackofeffectivenessofbebtelovimabmonoclonalantibodyamonghighriskpatientswithsarscov2omicronduringba2ba2121andba5subvariantsdominatedera