Cargando…

Acceptance of Assistive Technology by Users with Motor Disabilities Due to Spinal Cord or Acquired Brain Injuries: A Systematic Review

Acquired motor limits can be provoked by neurological lesions. Independently of the aetiologies, the lesions require patients to develop new coping strategies and adapt to the changed motor functionalities. In all of these occasions, what is defined as an assistive technology (AT) may represent a pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ventura, Sara, Ottoboni, Giovanni, Pappadà, Alessandro, Tessari, Alessia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10146680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37109297
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082962
_version_ 1785034636680757248
author Ventura, Sara
Ottoboni, Giovanni
Pappadà, Alessandro
Tessari, Alessia
author_facet Ventura, Sara
Ottoboni, Giovanni
Pappadà, Alessandro
Tessari, Alessia
author_sort Ventura, Sara
collection PubMed
description Acquired motor limits can be provoked by neurological lesions. Independently of the aetiologies, the lesions require patients to develop new coping strategies and adapt to the changed motor functionalities. In all of these occasions, what is defined as an assistive technology (AT) may represent a promising solution. The present work is a systematic review of the scientific AT-related literature published in the PubMed, Cinahl, and Psychinfo databases up to September 2022. This review was undertaken to summarise how the acceptance of AT is assessed in people with motor deficits due to neurological lesions. We review papers that (1) dealt with adults (≥18 years old) with motor deficits due to spinal cord or acquired brain injuries and (2) concerned user acceptance of hard AT. A total of 615 studies emerged, and 18 articles were reviewed according to the criteria. The constructs used to assess users’ acceptance mainly entail people’s satisfaction, ease of use, safety and comfort. Moreover, the acceptance constructs varied as a function of participants’ injury severity. Despite the heterogeneity, acceptability was mainly ascertained through pilot and usability studies in laboratory settings. Furthermore, ad-hoc questionnaires and qualitative methods were preferred to unstandardized protocols of measurement. This review highlights the way in which people living with acquired motor limits greatly appreciate ATs. On the other hand, methodological heterogeneity indicates that evaluation protocols should be systematized and finely tuned.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10146680
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101466802023-04-29 Acceptance of Assistive Technology by Users with Motor Disabilities Due to Spinal Cord or Acquired Brain Injuries: A Systematic Review Ventura, Sara Ottoboni, Giovanni Pappadà, Alessandro Tessari, Alessia J Clin Med Systematic Review Acquired motor limits can be provoked by neurological lesions. Independently of the aetiologies, the lesions require patients to develop new coping strategies and adapt to the changed motor functionalities. In all of these occasions, what is defined as an assistive technology (AT) may represent a promising solution. The present work is a systematic review of the scientific AT-related literature published in the PubMed, Cinahl, and Psychinfo databases up to September 2022. This review was undertaken to summarise how the acceptance of AT is assessed in people with motor deficits due to neurological lesions. We review papers that (1) dealt with adults (≥18 years old) with motor deficits due to spinal cord or acquired brain injuries and (2) concerned user acceptance of hard AT. A total of 615 studies emerged, and 18 articles were reviewed according to the criteria. The constructs used to assess users’ acceptance mainly entail people’s satisfaction, ease of use, safety and comfort. Moreover, the acceptance constructs varied as a function of participants’ injury severity. Despite the heterogeneity, acceptability was mainly ascertained through pilot and usability studies in laboratory settings. Furthermore, ad-hoc questionnaires and qualitative methods were preferred to unstandardized protocols of measurement. This review highlights the way in which people living with acquired motor limits greatly appreciate ATs. On the other hand, methodological heterogeneity indicates that evaluation protocols should be systematized and finely tuned. MDPI 2023-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10146680/ /pubmed/37109297 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082962 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Ventura, Sara
Ottoboni, Giovanni
Pappadà, Alessandro
Tessari, Alessia
Acceptance of Assistive Technology by Users with Motor Disabilities Due to Spinal Cord or Acquired Brain Injuries: A Systematic Review
title Acceptance of Assistive Technology by Users with Motor Disabilities Due to Spinal Cord or Acquired Brain Injuries: A Systematic Review
title_full Acceptance of Assistive Technology by Users with Motor Disabilities Due to Spinal Cord or Acquired Brain Injuries: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Acceptance of Assistive Technology by Users with Motor Disabilities Due to Spinal Cord or Acquired Brain Injuries: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Acceptance of Assistive Technology by Users with Motor Disabilities Due to Spinal Cord or Acquired Brain Injuries: A Systematic Review
title_short Acceptance of Assistive Technology by Users with Motor Disabilities Due to Spinal Cord or Acquired Brain Injuries: A Systematic Review
title_sort acceptance of assistive technology by users with motor disabilities due to spinal cord or acquired brain injuries: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10146680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37109297
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082962
work_keys_str_mv AT venturasara acceptanceofassistivetechnologybyuserswithmotordisabilitiesduetospinalcordoracquiredbraininjuriesasystematicreview
AT ottobonigiovanni acceptanceofassistivetechnologybyuserswithmotordisabilitiesduetospinalcordoracquiredbraininjuriesasystematicreview
AT pappadaalessandro acceptanceofassistivetechnologybyuserswithmotordisabilitiesduetospinalcordoracquiredbraininjuriesasystematicreview
AT tessarialessia acceptanceofassistivetechnologybyuserswithmotordisabilitiesduetospinalcordoracquiredbraininjuriesasystematicreview