Cargando…

The Effect of Different Stimulation Rates on Brainstem Auditory-Evoked-Potential Responses

Introduction  Auditory-evoked potentials are influenced by several factors, including polarity, filter, stimulus intensity and stimulation rate. The presentation of higher rates of stimuli per second enables the collection of a greater number of responses in a given period of time, promoting a short...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andrade, Kelly Cristina Lira de, Frizzo, Ana Cláudia Figueiredo, Oliveira, Katielle Menezes de, Pinheiro, Natália dos Santos, Marques, Maria Cecilia dos Santos, Carnaúba, Aline Tenório Lins, Costa, Klinger Vagner Teixeira, Menezes, Pedro de Lemos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10147464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37125354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768210
_version_ 1785034798611300352
author Andrade, Kelly Cristina Lira de
Frizzo, Ana Cláudia Figueiredo
Oliveira, Katielle Menezes de
Pinheiro, Natália dos Santos
Marques, Maria Cecilia dos Santos
Carnaúba, Aline Tenório Lins
Costa, Klinger Vagner Teixeira
Menezes, Pedro de Lemos
author_facet Andrade, Kelly Cristina Lira de
Frizzo, Ana Cláudia Figueiredo
Oliveira, Katielle Menezes de
Pinheiro, Natália dos Santos
Marques, Maria Cecilia dos Santos
Carnaúba, Aline Tenório Lins
Costa, Klinger Vagner Teixeira
Menezes, Pedro de Lemos
author_sort Andrade, Kelly Cristina Lira de
collection PubMed
description Introduction  Auditory-evoked potentials are influenced by several factors, including polarity, filter, stimulus intensity and stimulation rate. The presentation of higher rates of stimuli per second enables the collection of a greater number of responses in a given period of time, promoting a shorter testing time; however, the collected recordings are subject to changes related to wave morphology. Objectives  To compare the brainstem auditory-evoked-potential responses with click stimulus with the most commonly used stimulation rates in the clinical practice. Methods  The present cross-sectional analytical study was performed with fifteen participants of both genders and normal hearing thresholds. The brainstem auditory-evoked potential was performed at four different stimulation rates (21.1, 26.7, and 27.7 stimuli/s, and a rate determined based on a mathematical calculation using the a measurement of the transmission frequency of the power grid at the time of the examination). Results  We observed that the rate of 21.1 stimuli/s showed the highest amplitudes for waves I, III, and V when compared with the other rates. The rate of 26.7 stimuli/s, when compared with 27.7 stimuli/s, showed a higher amplitude for wave V. The latency if wave V was significantly lower with the rate of 21.1 stimuli/s than with 27.7 stimuli/s. Conclusions  The stimulation rate interferes with wave latencies and amplitudes; its decrease from 27.7 to 21.1 stimuli/s decreases the latency of wave V and increases the amplitues and improves the morphology of waves I, III and V. In addition, we found evidence that suggests an improvement in the visualization of wave III by adjusting the stimulation rate based on a measurement of the local transmission frequency of the power grid.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10147464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101474642023-04-29 The Effect of Different Stimulation Rates on Brainstem Auditory-Evoked-Potential Responses Andrade, Kelly Cristina Lira de Frizzo, Ana Cláudia Figueiredo Oliveira, Katielle Menezes de Pinheiro, Natália dos Santos Marques, Maria Cecilia dos Santos Carnaúba, Aline Tenório Lins Costa, Klinger Vagner Teixeira Menezes, Pedro de Lemos Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol Introduction  Auditory-evoked potentials are influenced by several factors, including polarity, filter, stimulus intensity and stimulation rate. The presentation of higher rates of stimuli per second enables the collection of a greater number of responses in a given period of time, promoting a shorter testing time; however, the collected recordings are subject to changes related to wave morphology. Objectives  To compare the brainstem auditory-evoked-potential responses with click stimulus with the most commonly used stimulation rates in the clinical practice. Methods  The present cross-sectional analytical study was performed with fifteen participants of both genders and normal hearing thresholds. The brainstem auditory-evoked potential was performed at four different stimulation rates (21.1, 26.7, and 27.7 stimuli/s, and a rate determined based on a mathematical calculation using the a measurement of the transmission frequency of the power grid at the time of the examination). Results  We observed that the rate of 21.1 stimuli/s showed the highest amplitudes for waves I, III, and V when compared with the other rates. The rate of 26.7 stimuli/s, when compared with 27.7 stimuli/s, showed a higher amplitude for wave V. The latency if wave V was significantly lower with the rate of 21.1 stimuli/s than with 27.7 stimuli/s. Conclusions  The stimulation rate interferes with wave latencies and amplitudes; its decrease from 27.7 to 21.1 stimuli/s decreases the latency of wave V and increases the amplitues and improves the morphology of waves I, III and V. In addition, we found evidence that suggests an improvement in the visualization of wave III by adjusting the stimulation rate based on a measurement of the local transmission frequency of the power grid. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2023-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10147464/ /pubmed/37125354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768210 Text en Fundação Otorrinolaringologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Andrade, Kelly Cristina Lira de
Frizzo, Ana Cláudia Figueiredo
Oliveira, Katielle Menezes de
Pinheiro, Natália dos Santos
Marques, Maria Cecilia dos Santos
Carnaúba, Aline Tenório Lins
Costa, Klinger Vagner Teixeira
Menezes, Pedro de Lemos
The Effect of Different Stimulation Rates on Brainstem Auditory-Evoked-Potential Responses
title The Effect of Different Stimulation Rates on Brainstem Auditory-Evoked-Potential Responses
title_full The Effect of Different Stimulation Rates on Brainstem Auditory-Evoked-Potential Responses
title_fullStr The Effect of Different Stimulation Rates on Brainstem Auditory-Evoked-Potential Responses
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Different Stimulation Rates on Brainstem Auditory-Evoked-Potential Responses
title_short The Effect of Different Stimulation Rates on Brainstem Auditory-Evoked-Potential Responses
title_sort effect of different stimulation rates on brainstem auditory-evoked-potential responses
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10147464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37125354
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768210
work_keys_str_mv AT andradekellycristinalirade theeffectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses
AT frizzoanaclaudiafigueiredo theeffectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses
AT oliveirakatiellemenezesde theeffectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses
AT pinheironataliadossantos theeffectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses
AT marquesmariaceciliadossantos theeffectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses
AT carnaubaalinetenoriolins theeffectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses
AT costaklingervagnerteixeira theeffectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses
AT menezespedrodelemos theeffectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses
AT andradekellycristinalirade effectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses
AT frizzoanaclaudiafigueiredo effectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses
AT oliveirakatiellemenezesde effectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses
AT pinheironataliadossantos effectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses
AT marquesmariaceciliadossantos effectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses
AT carnaubaalinetenoriolins effectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses
AT costaklingervagnerteixeira effectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses
AT menezespedrodelemos effectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses