Cargando…
The Effect of Different Stimulation Rates on Brainstem Auditory-Evoked-Potential Responses
Introduction Auditory-evoked potentials are influenced by several factors, including polarity, filter, stimulus intensity and stimulation rate. The presentation of higher rates of stimuli per second enables the collection of a greater number of responses in a given period of time, promoting a short...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10147464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37125354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768210 |
_version_ | 1785034798611300352 |
---|---|
author | Andrade, Kelly Cristina Lira de Frizzo, Ana Cláudia Figueiredo Oliveira, Katielle Menezes de Pinheiro, Natália dos Santos Marques, Maria Cecilia dos Santos Carnaúba, Aline Tenório Lins Costa, Klinger Vagner Teixeira Menezes, Pedro de Lemos |
author_facet | Andrade, Kelly Cristina Lira de Frizzo, Ana Cláudia Figueiredo Oliveira, Katielle Menezes de Pinheiro, Natália dos Santos Marques, Maria Cecilia dos Santos Carnaúba, Aline Tenório Lins Costa, Klinger Vagner Teixeira Menezes, Pedro de Lemos |
author_sort | Andrade, Kelly Cristina Lira de |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction Auditory-evoked potentials are influenced by several factors, including polarity, filter, stimulus intensity and stimulation rate. The presentation of higher rates of stimuli per second enables the collection of a greater number of responses in a given period of time, promoting a shorter testing time; however, the collected recordings are subject to changes related to wave morphology. Objectives To compare the brainstem auditory-evoked-potential responses with click stimulus with the most commonly used stimulation rates in the clinical practice. Methods The present cross-sectional analytical study was performed with fifteen participants of both genders and normal hearing thresholds. The brainstem auditory-evoked potential was performed at four different stimulation rates (21.1, 26.7, and 27.7 stimuli/s, and a rate determined based on a mathematical calculation using the a measurement of the transmission frequency of the power grid at the time of the examination). Results We observed that the rate of 21.1 stimuli/s showed the highest amplitudes for waves I, III, and V when compared with the other rates. The rate of 26.7 stimuli/s, when compared with 27.7 stimuli/s, showed a higher amplitude for wave V. The latency if wave V was significantly lower with the rate of 21.1 stimuli/s than with 27.7 stimuli/s. Conclusions The stimulation rate interferes with wave latencies and amplitudes; its decrease from 27.7 to 21.1 stimuli/s decreases the latency of wave V and increases the amplitues and improves the morphology of waves I, III and V. In addition, we found evidence that suggests an improvement in the visualization of wave III by adjusting the stimulation rate based on a measurement of the local transmission frequency of the power grid. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10147464 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101474642023-04-29 The Effect of Different Stimulation Rates on Brainstem Auditory-Evoked-Potential Responses Andrade, Kelly Cristina Lira de Frizzo, Ana Cláudia Figueiredo Oliveira, Katielle Menezes de Pinheiro, Natália dos Santos Marques, Maria Cecilia dos Santos Carnaúba, Aline Tenório Lins Costa, Klinger Vagner Teixeira Menezes, Pedro de Lemos Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol Introduction Auditory-evoked potentials are influenced by several factors, including polarity, filter, stimulus intensity and stimulation rate. The presentation of higher rates of stimuli per second enables the collection of a greater number of responses in a given period of time, promoting a shorter testing time; however, the collected recordings are subject to changes related to wave morphology. Objectives To compare the brainstem auditory-evoked-potential responses with click stimulus with the most commonly used stimulation rates in the clinical practice. Methods The present cross-sectional analytical study was performed with fifteen participants of both genders and normal hearing thresholds. The brainstem auditory-evoked potential was performed at four different stimulation rates (21.1, 26.7, and 27.7 stimuli/s, and a rate determined based on a mathematical calculation using the a measurement of the transmission frequency of the power grid at the time of the examination). Results We observed that the rate of 21.1 stimuli/s showed the highest amplitudes for waves I, III, and V when compared with the other rates. The rate of 26.7 stimuli/s, when compared with 27.7 stimuli/s, showed a higher amplitude for wave V. The latency if wave V was significantly lower with the rate of 21.1 stimuli/s than with 27.7 stimuli/s. Conclusions The stimulation rate interferes with wave latencies and amplitudes; its decrease from 27.7 to 21.1 stimuli/s decreases the latency of wave V and increases the amplitues and improves the morphology of waves I, III and V. In addition, we found evidence that suggests an improvement in the visualization of wave III by adjusting the stimulation rate based on a measurement of the local transmission frequency of the power grid. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2023-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10147464/ /pubmed/37125354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768210 Text en Fundação Otorrinolaringologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Andrade, Kelly Cristina Lira de Frizzo, Ana Cláudia Figueiredo Oliveira, Katielle Menezes de Pinheiro, Natália dos Santos Marques, Maria Cecilia dos Santos Carnaúba, Aline Tenório Lins Costa, Klinger Vagner Teixeira Menezes, Pedro de Lemos The Effect of Different Stimulation Rates on Brainstem Auditory-Evoked-Potential Responses |
title | The Effect of Different Stimulation Rates on Brainstem Auditory-Evoked-Potential Responses |
title_full | The Effect of Different Stimulation Rates on Brainstem Auditory-Evoked-Potential Responses |
title_fullStr | The Effect of Different Stimulation Rates on Brainstem Auditory-Evoked-Potential Responses |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of Different Stimulation Rates on Brainstem Auditory-Evoked-Potential Responses |
title_short | The Effect of Different Stimulation Rates on Brainstem Auditory-Evoked-Potential Responses |
title_sort | effect of different stimulation rates on brainstem auditory-evoked-potential responses |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10147464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37125354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768210 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andradekellycristinalirade theeffectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses AT frizzoanaclaudiafigueiredo theeffectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses AT oliveirakatiellemenezesde theeffectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses AT pinheironataliadossantos theeffectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses AT marquesmariaceciliadossantos theeffectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses AT carnaubaalinetenoriolins theeffectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses AT costaklingervagnerteixeira theeffectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses AT menezespedrodelemos theeffectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses AT andradekellycristinalirade effectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses AT frizzoanaclaudiafigueiredo effectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses AT oliveirakatiellemenezesde effectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses AT pinheironataliadossantos effectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses AT marquesmariaceciliadossantos effectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses AT carnaubaalinetenoriolins effectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses AT costaklingervagnerteixeira effectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses AT menezespedrodelemos effectofdifferentstimulationratesonbrainstemauditoryevokedpotentialresponses |