Cargando…

Just a ‘romantic idea’? A theory-based interview study on medication review implementation with pharmacy owners

BACKGROUND: Recent legal changes in Germany entitle patients on multiple medications to receive a medication review (MR). However, the provision of MRs is not mandatory and pharmacy owners decide whether to implement this service in their pharmacies. AIM: To determine pharmacy owners’ attitudes towa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michel, Dorothee E., Tonna, Antonella P., Dartsch, Dorothee C., Weidmann, Anita E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10147800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36639520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-022-01524-2
_version_ 1785034868099383296
author Michel, Dorothee E.
Tonna, Antonella P.
Dartsch, Dorothee C.
Weidmann, Anita E.
author_facet Michel, Dorothee E.
Tonna, Antonella P.
Dartsch, Dorothee C.
Weidmann, Anita E.
author_sort Michel, Dorothee E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent legal changes in Germany entitle patients on multiple medications to receive a medication review (MR). However, the provision of MRs is not mandatory and pharmacy owners decide whether to implement this service in their pharmacies. AIM: To determine pharmacy owners’ attitudes towards MRs, explore their experiences with MR implementation and examine their perceptions of barriers and facilitators towards implementation of MRs in community pharmacies. METHOD: Pharmacy owners were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. Purposive sampling was used with selection criteria being MR-implementation stage, and geographical location of the pharmacy. The topic guide was based on a systematic review and the Framework for Implementation of Services in Pharmacy (FISpH). Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and coded directly against the FISpH. RESULTS: Twenty-one pharmacy owners were interviewed. Despite participants’ consistent positive attitude towards MRs, most believed that providing MRs on an economically viable basis would be challenging. Several practical suggestions emerged which would enable community pharmacies a smoother implementation of MRs. Suggestions included employing ‘change facilitators’, who visit and support implementing pharmacies; national awareness campaigns targeting patients and health professionals; reducing bureaucracy; continuing professional development; involving technicians in some MR-tasks; and offering an additional incentive to lower the initial implementation threshold. CONCLUSION: This research identified numerous factors that are likely to increase owners’ and managers’ support to the idea of MRs. This may be of interest to any country planning implementation of MRs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11096-022-01524-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10147800
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101478002023-04-30 Just a ‘romantic idea’? A theory-based interview study on medication review implementation with pharmacy owners Michel, Dorothee E. Tonna, Antonella P. Dartsch, Dorothee C. Weidmann, Anita E. Int J Clin Pharm Research Article BACKGROUND: Recent legal changes in Germany entitle patients on multiple medications to receive a medication review (MR). However, the provision of MRs is not mandatory and pharmacy owners decide whether to implement this service in their pharmacies. AIM: To determine pharmacy owners’ attitudes towards MRs, explore their experiences with MR implementation and examine their perceptions of barriers and facilitators towards implementation of MRs in community pharmacies. METHOD: Pharmacy owners were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. Purposive sampling was used with selection criteria being MR-implementation stage, and geographical location of the pharmacy. The topic guide was based on a systematic review and the Framework for Implementation of Services in Pharmacy (FISpH). Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and coded directly against the FISpH. RESULTS: Twenty-one pharmacy owners were interviewed. Despite participants’ consistent positive attitude towards MRs, most believed that providing MRs on an economically viable basis would be challenging. Several practical suggestions emerged which would enable community pharmacies a smoother implementation of MRs. Suggestions included employing ‘change facilitators’, who visit and support implementing pharmacies; national awareness campaigns targeting patients and health professionals; reducing bureaucracy; continuing professional development; involving technicians in some MR-tasks; and offering an additional incentive to lower the initial implementation threshold. CONCLUSION: This research identified numerous factors that are likely to increase owners’ and managers’ support to the idea of MRs. This may be of interest to any country planning implementation of MRs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11096-022-01524-2. Springer International Publishing 2023-01-13 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10147800/ /pubmed/36639520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-022-01524-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Michel, Dorothee E.
Tonna, Antonella P.
Dartsch, Dorothee C.
Weidmann, Anita E.
Just a ‘romantic idea’? A theory-based interview study on medication review implementation with pharmacy owners
title Just a ‘romantic idea’? A theory-based interview study on medication review implementation with pharmacy owners
title_full Just a ‘romantic idea’? A theory-based interview study on medication review implementation with pharmacy owners
title_fullStr Just a ‘romantic idea’? A theory-based interview study on medication review implementation with pharmacy owners
title_full_unstemmed Just a ‘romantic idea’? A theory-based interview study on medication review implementation with pharmacy owners
title_short Just a ‘romantic idea’? A theory-based interview study on medication review implementation with pharmacy owners
title_sort just a ‘romantic idea’? a theory-based interview study on medication review implementation with pharmacy owners
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10147800/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36639520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-022-01524-2
work_keys_str_mv AT micheldorotheee justaromanticideaatheorybasedinterviewstudyonmedicationreviewimplementationwithpharmacyowners
AT tonnaantonellap justaromanticideaatheorybasedinterviewstudyonmedicationreviewimplementationwithpharmacyowners
AT dartschdorotheec justaromanticideaatheorybasedinterviewstudyonmedicationreviewimplementationwithpharmacyowners
AT weidmannanitae justaromanticideaatheorybasedinterviewstudyonmedicationreviewimplementationwithpharmacyowners