Cargando…
Just a ‘romantic idea’? A theory-based interview study on medication review implementation with pharmacy owners
BACKGROUND: Recent legal changes in Germany entitle patients on multiple medications to receive a medication review (MR). However, the provision of MRs is not mandatory and pharmacy owners decide whether to implement this service in their pharmacies. AIM: To determine pharmacy owners’ attitudes towa...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10147800/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36639520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-022-01524-2 |
_version_ | 1785034868099383296 |
---|---|
author | Michel, Dorothee E. Tonna, Antonella P. Dartsch, Dorothee C. Weidmann, Anita E. |
author_facet | Michel, Dorothee E. Tonna, Antonella P. Dartsch, Dorothee C. Weidmann, Anita E. |
author_sort | Michel, Dorothee E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recent legal changes in Germany entitle patients on multiple medications to receive a medication review (MR). However, the provision of MRs is not mandatory and pharmacy owners decide whether to implement this service in their pharmacies. AIM: To determine pharmacy owners’ attitudes towards MRs, explore their experiences with MR implementation and examine their perceptions of barriers and facilitators towards implementation of MRs in community pharmacies. METHOD: Pharmacy owners were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. Purposive sampling was used with selection criteria being MR-implementation stage, and geographical location of the pharmacy. The topic guide was based on a systematic review and the Framework for Implementation of Services in Pharmacy (FISpH). Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and coded directly against the FISpH. RESULTS: Twenty-one pharmacy owners were interviewed. Despite participants’ consistent positive attitude towards MRs, most believed that providing MRs on an economically viable basis would be challenging. Several practical suggestions emerged which would enable community pharmacies a smoother implementation of MRs. Suggestions included employing ‘change facilitators’, who visit and support implementing pharmacies; national awareness campaigns targeting patients and health professionals; reducing bureaucracy; continuing professional development; involving technicians in some MR-tasks; and offering an additional incentive to lower the initial implementation threshold. CONCLUSION: This research identified numerous factors that are likely to increase owners’ and managers’ support to the idea of MRs. This may be of interest to any country planning implementation of MRs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11096-022-01524-2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10147800 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101478002023-04-30 Just a ‘romantic idea’? A theory-based interview study on medication review implementation with pharmacy owners Michel, Dorothee E. Tonna, Antonella P. Dartsch, Dorothee C. Weidmann, Anita E. Int J Clin Pharm Research Article BACKGROUND: Recent legal changes in Germany entitle patients on multiple medications to receive a medication review (MR). However, the provision of MRs is not mandatory and pharmacy owners decide whether to implement this service in their pharmacies. AIM: To determine pharmacy owners’ attitudes towards MRs, explore their experiences with MR implementation and examine their perceptions of barriers and facilitators towards implementation of MRs in community pharmacies. METHOD: Pharmacy owners were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews. Purposive sampling was used with selection criteria being MR-implementation stage, and geographical location of the pharmacy. The topic guide was based on a systematic review and the Framework for Implementation of Services in Pharmacy (FISpH). Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and coded directly against the FISpH. RESULTS: Twenty-one pharmacy owners were interviewed. Despite participants’ consistent positive attitude towards MRs, most believed that providing MRs on an economically viable basis would be challenging. Several practical suggestions emerged which would enable community pharmacies a smoother implementation of MRs. Suggestions included employing ‘change facilitators’, who visit and support implementing pharmacies; national awareness campaigns targeting patients and health professionals; reducing bureaucracy; continuing professional development; involving technicians in some MR-tasks; and offering an additional incentive to lower the initial implementation threshold. CONCLUSION: This research identified numerous factors that are likely to increase owners’ and managers’ support to the idea of MRs. This may be of interest to any country planning implementation of MRs. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11096-022-01524-2. Springer International Publishing 2023-01-13 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10147800/ /pubmed/36639520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-022-01524-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Article Michel, Dorothee E. Tonna, Antonella P. Dartsch, Dorothee C. Weidmann, Anita E. Just a ‘romantic idea’? A theory-based interview study on medication review implementation with pharmacy owners |
title | Just a ‘romantic idea’? A theory-based interview study on medication review implementation with pharmacy owners |
title_full | Just a ‘romantic idea’? A theory-based interview study on medication review implementation with pharmacy owners |
title_fullStr | Just a ‘romantic idea’? A theory-based interview study on medication review implementation with pharmacy owners |
title_full_unstemmed | Just a ‘romantic idea’? A theory-based interview study on medication review implementation with pharmacy owners |
title_short | Just a ‘romantic idea’? A theory-based interview study on medication review implementation with pharmacy owners |
title_sort | just a ‘romantic idea’? a theory-based interview study on medication review implementation with pharmacy owners |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10147800/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36639520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11096-022-01524-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT micheldorotheee justaromanticideaatheorybasedinterviewstudyonmedicationreviewimplementationwithpharmacyowners AT tonnaantonellap justaromanticideaatheorybasedinterviewstudyonmedicationreviewimplementationwithpharmacyowners AT dartschdorotheec justaromanticideaatheorybasedinterviewstudyonmedicationreviewimplementationwithpharmacyowners AT weidmannanitae justaromanticideaatheorybasedinterviewstudyonmedicationreviewimplementationwithpharmacyowners |