Cargando…

A comparison of special intrauterine balloons and intrauterine contraceptive devices in the treatment of intrauterine adhesions

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of a special kind of intrauterine balloon (IUB) and that of an intrauterine contraception device (IUD) for patients with intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) after transcervical resection of adhesion (TCRA). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, afte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhuang, Lin-Lin, Wang, Kai, Shen, Hai-Lan, Lin, Jia-Hui, Lu, Ye, Luo, Zhen-Yu, Wang, Wen-Rong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10147804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36897397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-06993-y
_version_ 1785034869095530496
author Zhuang, Lin-Lin
Wang, Kai
Shen, Hai-Lan
Lin, Jia-Hui
Lu, Ye
Luo, Zhen-Yu
Wang, Wen-Rong
author_facet Zhuang, Lin-Lin
Wang, Kai
Shen, Hai-Lan
Lin, Jia-Hui
Lu, Ye
Luo, Zhen-Yu
Wang, Wen-Rong
author_sort Zhuang, Lin-Lin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of a special kind of intrauterine balloon (IUB) and that of an intrauterine contraception device (IUD) for patients with intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) after transcervical resection of adhesion (TCRA). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, after TCRA, 31 patients received a special IUB, and 38 patients received an IUD. The Fisher exact test, logistic regression method, Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression model were used for statistical analysis. A two-sided value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The readhesion rate significantly differed between the IUB group and IUD group, at 15.39% and 54.06%, respectively (P = 0.002). For recurrent moderate IUA, patients in the IUB group had lower scores than patients in the IUD group (P = 0.035). There was a significant difference in the intrauterine pregnancy rate of IUA patients in the IUB group and IUD group after treatment, with rates of 55.56% and 14.29%, respectively (P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Patients in the special IUB group had better outcomes than those in the IUD group, which has a certain guiding significance for clinical work.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10147804
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101478042023-04-30 A comparison of special intrauterine balloons and intrauterine contraceptive devices in the treatment of intrauterine adhesions Zhuang, Lin-Lin Wang, Kai Shen, Hai-Lan Lin, Jia-Hui Lu, Ye Luo, Zhen-Yu Wang, Wen-Rong Arch Gynecol Obstet General Gynecology PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of a special kind of intrauterine balloon (IUB) and that of an intrauterine contraception device (IUD) for patients with intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) after transcervical resection of adhesion (TCRA). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, after TCRA, 31 patients received a special IUB, and 38 patients received an IUD. The Fisher exact test, logistic regression method, Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression model were used for statistical analysis. A two-sided value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The readhesion rate significantly differed between the IUB group and IUD group, at 15.39% and 54.06%, respectively (P = 0.002). For recurrent moderate IUA, patients in the IUB group had lower scores than patients in the IUD group (P = 0.035). There was a significant difference in the intrauterine pregnancy rate of IUA patients in the IUB group and IUD group after treatment, with rates of 55.56% and 14.29%, respectively (P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Patients in the special IUB group had better outcomes than those in the IUD group, which has a certain guiding significance for clinical work. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-03-10 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10147804/ /pubmed/36897397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-06993-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle General Gynecology
Zhuang, Lin-Lin
Wang, Kai
Shen, Hai-Lan
Lin, Jia-Hui
Lu, Ye
Luo, Zhen-Yu
Wang, Wen-Rong
A comparison of special intrauterine balloons and intrauterine contraceptive devices in the treatment of intrauterine adhesions
title A comparison of special intrauterine balloons and intrauterine contraceptive devices in the treatment of intrauterine adhesions
title_full A comparison of special intrauterine balloons and intrauterine contraceptive devices in the treatment of intrauterine adhesions
title_fullStr A comparison of special intrauterine balloons and intrauterine contraceptive devices in the treatment of intrauterine adhesions
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of special intrauterine balloons and intrauterine contraceptive devices in the treatment of intrauterine adhesions
title_short A comparison of special intrauterine balloons and intrauterine contraceptive devices in the treatment of intrauterine adhesions
title_sort comparison of special intrauterine balloons and intrauterine contraceptive devices in the treatment of intrauterine adhesions
topic General Gynecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10147804/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36897397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-06993-y
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuanglinlin acomparisonofspecialintrauterineballoonsandintrauterinecontraceptivedevicesinthetreatmentofintrauterineadhesions
AT wangkai acomparisonofspecialintrauterineballoonsandintrauterinecontraceptivedevicesinthetreatmentofintrauterineadhesions
AT shenhailan acomparisonofspecialintrauterineballoonsandintrauterinecontraceptivedevicesinthetreatmentofintrauterineadhesions
AT linjiahui acomparisonofspecialintrauterineballoonsandintrauterinecontraceptivedevicesinthetreatmentofintrauterineadhesions
AT luye acomparisonofspecialintrauterineballoonsandintrauterinecontraceptivedevicesinthetreatmentofintrauterineadhesions
AT luozhenyu acomparisonofspecialintrauterineballoonsandintrauterinecontraceptivedevicesinthetreatmentofintrauterineadhesions
AT wangwenrong acomparisonofspecialintrauterineballoonsandintrauterinecontraceptivedevicesinthetreatmentofintrauterineadhesions
AT zhuanglinlin comparisonofspecialintrauterineballoonsandintrauterinecontraceptivedevicesinthetreatmentofintrauterineadhesions
AT wangkai comparisonofspecialintrauterineballoonsandintrauterinecontraceptivedevicesinthetreatmentofintrauterineadhesions
AT shenhailan comparisonofspecialintrauterineballoonsandintrauterinecontraceptivedevicesinthetreatmentofintrauterineadhesions
AT linjiahui comparisonofspecialintrauterineballoonsandintrauterinecontraceptivedevicesinthetreatmentofintrauterineadhesions
AT luye comparisonofspecialintrauterineballoonsandintrauterinecontraceptivedevicesinthetreatmentofintrauterineadhesions
AT luozhenyu comparisonofspecialintrauterineballoonsandintrauterinecontraceptivedevicesinthetreatmentofintrauterineadhesions
AT wangwenrong comparisonofspecialintrauterineballoonsandintrauterinecontraceptivedevicesinthetreatmentofintrauterineadhesions