Cargando…
Implications for surveillance for breast cancer patients based on the internally and externally validated BRENDA-metastatic recurrence score
PURPOSE: Although the incidence of distant relapse is decreasing, 20–30% of patients with early breast cancer die of metastasis. The aim of this study is to characterize patients with metastasis-free survival(MFS) less than 5 years, to analyze the most probable site of metastases according to the in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10147811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36917303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-023-06898-z |
_version_ | 1785034871622598656 |
---|---|
author | Ebner, Florian Salmen, Jessica Dayan, Davut Kiesel, Matthias Wolters, Regine Janni, Wolfgang Wöckel, Achim Wischnewsky, Manfred |
author_facet | Ebner, Florian Salmen, Jessica Dayan, Davut Kiesel, Matthias Wolters, Regine Janni, Wolfgang Wöckel, Achim Wischnewsky, Manfred |
author_sort | Ebner, Florian |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Although the incidence of distant relapse is decreasing, 20–30% of patients with early breast cancer die of metastasis. The aim of this study is to characterize patients with metastasis-free survival(MFS) less than 5 years, to analyze the most probable site of metastases according to the internally and externally validated BRENDA-score. The BRENDA-score is a combination of the biological subtype and clinical staging. METHOD: 3832 patients with primary diagnosis of breast cancer and either distant metastatic recurrence within 5 years or MFS ≥ 5 years were assigned to this study. Patients were classified for metastatic recurrence according to the BRENDA-score. 1765 patients were in a validation set. Statistical methods were Kaplan–Meier curves, Cox regression analysis, Exhausted CHAID, likelihood-ratio tests and the Nearest Neighbor Estimation method. RESULTS: There was a significant(p < 0.001) difference between the Kaplan–Meier MFS-functions of M0-patients stratified by BRENDA-score. The BRENDA score outperforms intrinsic subtypes and the Nottingham prognostic score. It fits the original data and the validation set equally well (p = 0.179).There was a significant(p < 0.001) difference between mean BRENDA-Index for patients with MFS < 5y(21.0 ± 9.0) and patients with MFS ≥ 5y(mean BRENDA-Index 11.7 ± 8.2). 55.6% of the very high risk patients(BRENDA-Index ≥ 27) had metastases within 5 years. The most likely primary metastatic site was bone(30%) followed by liver(19%) and lung(18%). The discriminatory ability(areas under the time dependent ROC curve) of the BRENDA score is good to acceptable for the first 5 years. In the very low/low risk (intermediate, high/very high) risk group 50% of all metastases were diagnosed within 26 months. Guideline adherence had a highly significant influence on outcome independent of the risk group. CONCLUSION: The evaluation showed that the BRENDA-Score is a robust predictive tool for breast cancer recurrence and site of metastases in the first five years after diagnosis. It outperforms intrinsic subtypes and the Nottingham prognostic score. The BRENDA-score could be a tool for a risk orientated and targeted follow up. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10147811 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101478112023-04-30 Implications for surveillance for breast cancer patients based on the internally and externally validated BRENDA-metastatic recurrence score Ebner, Florian Salmen, Jessica Dayan, Davut Kiesel, Matthias Wolters, Regine Janni, Wolfgang Wöckel, Achim Wischnewsky, Manfred Breast Cancer Res Treat Epidemiology PURPOSE: Although the incidence of distant relapse is decreasing, 20–30% of patients with early breast cancer die of metastasis. The aim of this study is to characterize patients with metastasis-free survival(MFS) less than 5 years, to analyze the most probable site of metastases according to the internally and externally validated BRENDA-score. The BRENDA-score is a combination of the biological subtype and clinical staging. METHOD: 3832 patients with primary diagnosis of breast cancer and either distant metastatic recurrence within 5 years or MFS ≥ 5 years were assigned to this study. Patients were classified for metastatic recurrence according to the BRENDA-score. 1765 patients were in a validation set. Statistical methods were Kaplan–Meier curves, Cox regression analysis, Exhausted CHAID, likelihood-ratio tests and the Nearest Neighbor Estimation method. RESULTS: There was a significant(p < 0.001) difference between the Kaplan–Meier MFS-functions of M0-patients stratified by BRENDA-score. The BRENDA score outperforms intrinsic subtypes and the Nottingham prognostic score. It fits the original data and the validation set equally well (p = 0.179).There was a significant(p < 0.001) difference between mean BRENDA-Index for patients with MFS < 5y(21.0 ± 9.0) and patients with MFS ≥ 5y(mean BRENDA-Index 11.7 ± 8.2). 55.6% of the very high risk patients(BRENDA-Index ≥ 27) had metastases within 5 years. The most likely primary metastatic site was bone(30%) followed by liver(19%) and lung(18%). The discriminatory ability(areas under the time dependent ROC curve) of the BRENDA score is good to acceptable for the first 5 years. In the very low/low risk (intermediate, high/very high) risk group 50% of all metastases were diagnosed within 26 months. Guideline adherence had a highly significant influence on outcome independent of the risk group. CONCLUSION: The evaluation showed that the BRENDA-Score is a robust predictive tool for breast cancer recurrence and site of metastases in the first five years after diagnosis. It outperforms intrinsic subtypes and the Nottingham prognostic score. The BRENDA-score could be a tool for a risk orientated and targeted follow up. Springer US 2023-03-14 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10147811/ /pubmed/36917303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-023-06898-z Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Epidemiology Ebner, Florian Salmen, Jessica Dayan, Davut Kiesel, Matthias Wolters, Regine Janni, Wolfgang Wöckel, Achim Wischnewsky, Manfred Implications for surveillance for breast cancer patients based on the internally and externally validated BRENDA-metastatic recurrence score |
title | Implications for surveillance for breast cancer patients based on the internally and externally validated BRENDA-metastatic recurrence score |
title_full | Implications for surveillance for breast cancer patients based on the internally and externally validated BRENDA-metastatic recurrence score |
title_fullStr | Implications for surveillance for breast cancer patients based on the internally and externally validated BRENDA-metastatic recurrence score |
title_full_unstemmed | Implications for surveillance for breast cancer patients based on the internally and externally validated BRENDA-metastatic recurrence score |
title_short | Implications for surveillance for breast cancer patients based on the internally and externally validated BRENDA-metastatic recurrence score |
title_sort | implications for surveillance for breast cancer patients based on the internally and externally validated brenda-metastatic recurrence score |
topic | Epidemiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10147811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36917303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-023-06898-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ebnerflorian implicationsforsurveillanceforbreastcancerpatientsbasedontheinternallyandexternallyvalidatedbrendametastaticrecurrencescore AT salmenjessica implicationsforsurveillanceforbreastcancerpatientsbasedontheinternallyandexternallyvalidatedbrendametastaticrecurrencescore AT dayandavut implicationsforsurveillanceforbreastcancerpatientsbasedontheinternallyandexternallyvalidatedbrendametastaticrecurrencescore AT kieselmatthias implicationsforsurveillanceforbreastcancerpatientsbasedontheinternallyandexternallyvalidatedbrendametastaticrecurrencescore AT woltersregine implicationsforsurveillanceforbreastcancerpatientsbasedontheinternallyandexternallyvalidatedbrendametastaticrecurrencescore AT janniwolfgang implicationsforsurveillanceforbreastcancerpatientsbasedontheinternallyandexternallyvalidatedbrendametastaticrecurrencescore AT wockelachim implicationsforsurveillanceforbreastcancerpatientsbasedontheinternallyandexternallyvalidatedbrendametastaticrecurrencescore AT wischnewskymanfred implicationsforsurveillanceforbreastcancerpatientsbasedontheinternallyandexternallyvalidatedbrendametastaticrecurrencescore |