Cargando…

Association of preoperative conization with recurrences after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for FIGO 2018 stage IB1 cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate association of preoperative conization with recurrences after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) for FIGO 2018 stage IB1 cervical cancer. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-center study. Patients who underwent LRH for cervical cancer with squamous, adenosquamous and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Ding, Yan, Zhang, Xuyin, Qiu, Junjun, Li, Chunbo, Hua, Keqin
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:	Gynecologic Oncology
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10147815/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36329212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06816-6

Ejemplares similares

Feasibility and outcome of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with no-look no-touch technique for FIGO IB1 cervical cancer
por: Kanao, Hiroyuki, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Identifying selection criteria for non‐radical hysterectomy in FIGO stage IB cervical cancer
por: Kasamatsu, Takahiro, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Association of preoperative cone biopsy with recurrences after radical hysterectomy
por: Klapdor, Rüdiger, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The upper limit of optimal tumor size in patients with FIGO 2018 stage IB2 cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy
por: Hwang, Woo Yeon, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Vaginal Radical Trachelectomy as Fertility‐Preserving Treatment for Patients with FIGO 2018 Stage 1B2 Cervical Cancer
por: Zusterzeel, Petra L.M., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Accuracy of conization procedure for predicting pathological parameters of radical hysterectomy in stage Ia2–Ib1 (≤2 cm) cervical cancer
por: Bai, Huimin, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Single-incision total laparoscopic hysterectomy
por: Sinha, Rakesh, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for 2018 FIGO stages IB1, IB2, and IIA1 cervical cancer: a large multicenter study
por: Chen, Xiaolin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
por: Zhang, Fuyun, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The Role of Conization before Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer including High Risk Factors of Recurrence: Propensity Score Matching
por: Chang, Chi-Son, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Radical hysterectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy versus radical radiotherapy for FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer
por: Chai, Yanlan, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Comparison of the survival outcomes of laparoscopic, abdominal and gasless laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: trial protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (LAGCC trial)
por: Tang, Xiaoyan, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Efficacy evaluation of vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a single-center retrospective case series study
por: Wang, Huimin, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Influence of training level on cervical cone size and resection margin status at conization: a retrospective study
por: Montanari, Eliana, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Utilization of lymph node evaluation at hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma in situ
por: Matsuo, Koji, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer stage IB1
por: Kim, Sang Il, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Stage Migration in Cervical Cancer Using the FIGO 2018 Staging System: A Retrospective Survival Analysis Using a Single-Institution Patient Cohort
por: Vengaloor Thomas, Toms, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Nomogram Predicting Parametrial Involvement Based on the Radical Hysterectomy Specimens in the Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
por: Li, Chunbo, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Chemoradiation with cisplatin followed by either brachytherapy or radical hysterectomy. A non-randomized comparison in FIGO stages IB2-IIA
por: Cetina, Lucely, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Comparison of the safety between cervical conization and hysterectomy for patients with cervical adenocarcinoma in situ
por: Liu, Jingjing, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The role of MRI in cervical cancer > 2 cm (FIGO stage IB2-IIA1) conservatively treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by conization: a pilot study
por: Russo, Luca, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cost-effectiveness of radical hysterectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy versus radical radiotherapy for FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer
por: Chai, Yanlan, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer
por: Jin, Yue-Mei, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Analysis of the effect of adjuvant radiotherapy on outcomes and complications after radical hysterectomy in FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with intermediate risk factors (GOTIC Study)
por: Nakamura, Kazuto, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Hospital versus individual surgeon’s performance in laparoscopic hysterectomy
por: Driessen, Sara R. C., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Effect of the surgical approach on survival outcomes in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A real‐world multicenter study of a large Chinese cohort from 2006 to 2017
por: Guo, Chenyan, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Radical hysterectomy for FIGO stage I–IIB adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix
por: Kasamatsu, T, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Survival Outcomes in Patients With 2018 FIGO Stage IA2–IIA2 Cervical Cancer Treated With Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy: A Propensity Score-Weighting Analysis
por: Zhao, Wancheng, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Clinical Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy after Radical Hysterectomy for FIGO Stage IB-IIA Cervical Cancer: Comparison with Adjuvant RT/CCRT Using Inverse-Probability-of-Treatment Weighting
por: Jung, Phill-Seung, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Implementation of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy As the Default Technique and Lessons Learnt
por: Roman, Jose D
Publicado: (2021)

Minimally invasive anesthesia for laparoscopic hysterectomy: a case series
por: Della Corte, Luigi, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Complications of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in a Tertiary Care Center
por: Pande, Benudhar, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Validation of the 2018 FIGO Classification for Cervical Cancer: Lymphovascular Space Invasion Should Be Considered in IB1 Stage
por: Balaya, Vincent, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Prognostic factors and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors of the uterine cervix based on the FIGO 2018 staging system: a single-institution study of 172 patients
por: Chen, Jian, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The early surgical period in robotic radical hysterectomy is related to the recurrence after surgery in stage IB cervical cancer
por: Paek, Jiheum, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Nerve-Sparing Modified Radical Hysterectomy for Severe Endometriosis and Complex Pelvic Pathology
por: Nezhat, Camran, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Long-term satisfaction of patients after laparoscopic and robotic-assisted hysterectomy
por: Gitas, Georgios, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Discussion on the rationality of FIGO 2018 stage IIIC for cervical cancer with oncological outcomes: a cohort study
por: Li, Zhiqiang, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Data from small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: FIGO 2018 staging is more accurate than FIGO 2009
por: Zhang, Yunqiang, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Reviewing FIGO 2018 cervical cancer staging
por: Soares, Leila Cristina, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_vd9fi28bfb6flmtsm5h2q8n11h