Cargando…

Preoperative lung ultrasound for confirming the double-lumen endotracheal tube position for one-lung ventilation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES: Insertion of a double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT) is the most commonly used method for one-lung ventilation (OLV). This meta-analysis was aimed at investigating the performance of lung ultrasound in assessing the DLT position in OLV. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for rela...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Po-Kai, Lin, Ting-Yu, Su, I-Min, Chang, Ke-Vin, Wu, Wei-Ting, Özçakar, Levent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10147981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37128322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15458
_version_ 1785034901041446912
author Wang, Po-Kai
Lin, Ting-Yu
Su, I-Min
Chang, Ke-Vin
Wu, Wei-Ting
Özçakar, Levent
author_facet Wang, Po-Kai
Lin, Ting-Yu
Su, I-Min
Chang, Ke-Vin
Wu, Wei-Ting
Özçakar, Levent
author_sort Wang, Po-Kai
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Insertion of a double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT) is the most commonly used method for one-lung ventilation (OLV). This meta-analysis was aimed at investigating the performance of lung ultrasound in assessing the DLT position in OLV. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for related trials from inception to October 2022. The primary outcome was the performance of ultrasound or clinical evaluation in confirming the correctness of the DLT position, using fiberoptic bronchoscopy or intraoperative direct visualization of lung collapse as the gold standard. The secondary outcome was the time required to confirm or adjust the DTL position. RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials and three observational studies involving 771 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound were 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79–0.98) and 0.61 (95% CI: 0.41–0.77), respectively, while those of clinical evaluation were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.73–0.99) and 0.35 (95% CI: 0.25–0.47), respectively. The pooled procedure duration was 122.27 s (95% CI: 20.85–223.69) with ultrasound and 112.03 s (95% CI: 95.30–128.76) with clinical evaluation. The area under the curve for discriminating the DLT position was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.82–0.88) for ultrasound and 0.52 (95% CI: 0.48–0.57) for clinical evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to clinical evaluation, ultrasound has a similar sensitivity but a better specificity for confirming the correctness of the DLT position. Ultrasound is an acceptable imaging tool for assessing DTL placement in OLV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10147981
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101479812023-04-30 Preoperative lung ultrasound for confirming the double-lumen endotracheal tube position for one-lung ventilation: A systematic review and meta-analysis Wang, Po-Kai Lin, Ting-Yu Su, I-Min Chang, Ke-Vin Wu, Wei-Ting Özçakar, Levent Heliyon Research Article OBJECTIVES: Insertion of a double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT) is the most commonly used method for one-lung ventilation (OLV). This meta-analysis was aimed at investigating the performance of lung ultrasound in assessing the DLT position in OLV. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for related trials from inception to October 2022. The primary outcome was the performance of ultrasound or clinical evaluation in confirming the correctness of the DLT position, using fiberoptic bronchoscopy or intraoperative direct visualization of lung collapse as the gold standard. The secondary outcome was the time required to confirm or adjust the DTL position. RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials and three observational studies involving 771 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound were 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.79–0.98) and 0.61 (95% CI: 0.41–0.77), respectively, while those of clinical evaluation were 0.93 (95% CI: 0.73–0.99) and 0.35 (95% CI: 0.25–0.47), respectively. The pooled procedure duration was 122.27 s (95% CI: 20.85–223.69) with ultrasound and 112.03 s (95% CI: 95.30–128.76) with clinical evaluation. The area under the curve for discriminating the DLT position was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.82–0.88) for ultrasound and 0.52 (95% CI: 0.48–0.57) for clinical evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to clinical evaluation, ultrasound has a similar sensitivity but a better specificity for confirming the correctness of the DLT position. Ultrasound is an acceptable imaging tool for assessing DTL placement in OLV. Elsevier 2023-04-13 /pmc/articles/PMC10147981/ /pubmed/37128322 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15458 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Po-Kai
Lin, Ting-Yu
Su, I-Min
Chang, Ke-Vin
Wu, Wei-Ting
Özçakar, Levent
Preoperative lung ultrasound for confirming the double-lumen endotracheal tube position for one-lung ventilation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Preoperative lung ultrasound for confirming the double-lumen endotracheal tube position for one-lung ventilation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Preoperative lung ultrasound for confirming the double-lumen endotracheal tube position for one-lung ventilation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Preoperative lung ultrasound for confirming the double-lumen endotracheal tube position for one-lung ventilation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Preoperative lung ultrasound for confirming the double-lumen endotracheal tube position for one-lung ventilation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Preoperative lung ultrasound for confirming the double-lumen endotracheal tube position for one-lung ventilation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort preoperative lung ultrasound for confirming the double-lumen endotracheal tube position for one-lung ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10147981/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37128322
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15458
work_keys_str_mv AT wangpokai preoperativelungultrasoundforconfirmingthedoublelumenendotrachealtubepositionforonelungventilationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lintingyu preoperativelungultrasoundforconfirmingthedoublelumenendotrachealtubepositionforonelungventilationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT suimin preoperativelungultrasoundforconfirmingthedoublelumenendotrachealtubepositionforonelungventilationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT changkevin preoperativelungultrasoundforconfirmingthedoublelumenendotrachealtubepositionforonelungventilationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wuweiting preoperativelungultrasoundforconfirmingthedoublelumenendotrachealtubepositionforonelungventilationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ozcakarlevent preoperativelungultrasoundforconfirmingthedoublelumenendotrachealtubepositionforonelungventilationasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis