Cargando…

Comparison of Research Spending on New Drug Approvals by the National Institutes of Health vs the Pharmaceutical Industry, 2010-2019

IMPORTANCE: Government and the pharmaceutical industry make substantive contributions to pharmaceutical innovation. This study compared the investments by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and industry and estimated the cost basis for assessing the balance of social and private returns. OBJECT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Galkina Cleary, Ekaterina, Jackson, Matthew J., Zhou, Edward W., Ledley, Fred D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10148199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37115539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.0511
_version_ 1785034948270358528
author Galkina Cleary, Ekaterina
Jackson, Matthew J.
Zhou, Edward W.
Ledley, Fred D.
author_facet Galkina Cleary, Ekaterina
Jackson, Matthew J.
Zhou, Edward W.
Ledley, Fred D.
author_sort Galkina Cleary, Ekaterina
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Government and the pharmaceutical industry make substantive contributions to pharmaceutical innovation. This study compared the investments by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and industry and estimated the cost basis for assessing the balance of social and private returns. OBJECTIVES: To compare NIH and industry investments in recent drug approvals. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study of NIH funding associated with drugs approved by the FDA from 2010 to 2019 was conducted from May 2020 to July 2022 and accounted for basic and applied research, failed clinical candidates, and discount rates for government spending compared with analogous estimates of industry investment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Costs from the NIH for research associated with drug approvals. RESULTS: Funding from the NIH was contributed to 354 of 356 drugs (99.4%) approved from 2010 to 2019 totaling $187 billion, with a mean (SD) $1344.6 ($1433.1) million per target for basic research on drug targets and $51.8 ($96.8) million per drug for applied research on products. Including costs for failed clinical candidates, mean (SD) NIH costs were $1441.5 ($1372.0) million per approval or $1730.3 ($1657.6) million per approval, estimated with a 3% discount rate. The mean (SD) NIH spending was $2956.0 ($3106.3) million per approval with a 10.5% cost of capital, which estimates the cost savings to industry from NIH spending. Spending and approval by NIH for 81 first-to-target drugs was greater than reported industry spending on 63 drugs approved from 2010 to 2019 (difference, −$1998.4 million; 95% CI, −$3302.1 million to −$694.6 million; P = .003). Spending from the NIH was not less than industry spending considering clinical failures, a 3% discount rate for NIH spending, and a 10.5% cost of capital for the industry (difference, −$1435.3 million; 95% CI, −$3114.6 million to $244.0 million; P = .09) or when industry spending included prehuman research (difference, −$1394.8 million; 95% CI, −$3774.8 million to $985.2 million; P = .25). Accounting for spillovers of NIH-funded basic research on drug targets to multiple products, NIH costs were $711.3 million with a 3% discount rate, which was less than the range of reported industry costs with 10.5% cost of capital. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results of this cross-sectional study found that NIH investment in drugs approved from 2010 to 2019 was not less than investment by the pharmaceutical industry, with comparable accounting for basic and applied research, failed clinical trials, and cost of capital or discount rates. The relative scale of NIH and industry investment may provide a cost basis for calibrating the balance of social and private returns from investments in pharmaceutical innovation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10148199
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101481992023-04-30 Comparison of Research Spending on New Drug Approvals by the National Institutes of Health vs the Pharmaceutical Industry, 2010-2019 Galkina Cleary, Ekaterina Jackson, Matthew J. Zhou, Edward W. Ledley, Fred D. JAMA Health Forum Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Government and the pharmaceutical industry make substantive contributions to pharmaceutical innovation. This study compared the investments by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and industry and estimated the cost basis for assessing the balance of social and private returns. OBJECTIVES: To compare NIH and industry investments in recent drug approvals. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study of NIH funding associated with drugs approved by the FDA from 2010 to 2019 was conducted from May 2020 to July 2022 and accounted for basic and applied research, failed clinical candidates, and discount rates for government spending compared with analogous estimates of industry investment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Costs from the NIH for research associated with drug approvals. RESULTS: Funding from the NIH was contributed to 354 of 356 drugs (99.4%) approved from 2010 to 2019 totaling $187 billion, with a mean (SD) $1344.6 ($1433.1) million per target for basic research on drug targets and $51.8 ($96.8) million per drug for applied research on products. Including costs for failed clinical candidates, mean (SD) NIH costs were $1441.5 ($1372.0) million per approval or $1730.3 ($1657.6) million per approval, estimated with a 3% discount rate. The mean (SD) NIH spending was $2956.0 ($3106.3) million per approval with a 10.5% cost of capital, which estimates the cost savings to industry from NIH spending. Spending and approval by NIH for 81 first-to-target drugs was greater than reported industry spending on 63 drugs approved from 2010 to 2019 (difference, −$1998.4 million; 95% CI, −$3302.1 million to −$694.6 million; P = .003). Spending from the NIH was not less than industry spending considering clinical failures, a 3% discount rate for NIH spending, and a 10.5% cost of capital for the industry (difference, −$1435.3 million; 95% CI, −$3114.6 million to $244.0 million; P = .09) or when industry spending included prehuman research (difference, −$1394.8 million; 95% CI, −$3774.8 million to $985.2 million; P = .25). Accounting for spillovers of NIH-funded basic research on drug targets to multiple products, NIH costs were $711.3 million with a 3% discount rate, which was less than the range of reported industry costs with 10.5% cost of capital. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results of this cross-sectional study found that NIH investment in drugs approved from 2010 to 2019 was not less than investment by the pharmaceutical industry, with comparable accounting for basic and applied research, failed clinical trials, and cost of capital or discount rates. The relative scale of NIH and industry investment may provide a cost basis for calibrating the balance of social and private returns from investments in pharmaceutical innovation. American Medical Association 2023-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10148199/ /pubmed/37115539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.0511 Text en Copyright 2023 Galkina Cleary E et al. JAMA Health Forum. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Galkina Cleary, Ekaterina
Jackson, Matthew J.
Zhou, Edward W.
Ledley, Fred D.
Comparison of Research Spending on New Drug Approvals by the National Institutes of Health vs the Pharmaceutical Industry, 2010-2019
title Comparison of Research Spending on New Drug Approvals by the National Institutes of Health vs the Pharmaceutical Industry, 2010-2019
title_full Comparison of Research Spending on New Drug Approvals by the National Institutes of Health vs the Pharmaceutical Industry, 2010-2019
title_fullStr Comparison of Research Spending on New Drug Approvals by the National Institutes of Health vs the Pharmaceutical Industry, 2010-2019
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Research Spending on New Drug Approvals by the National Institutes of Health vs the Pharmaceutical Industry, 2010-2019
title_short Comparison of Research Spending on New Drug Approvals by the National Institutes of Health vs the Pharmaceutical Industry, 2010-2019
title_sort comparison of research spending on new drug approvals by the national institutes of health vs the pharmaceutical industry, 2010-2019
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10148199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37115539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.0511
work_keys_str_mv AT galkinaclearyekaterina comparisonofresearchspendingonnewdrugapprovalsbythenationalinstitutesofhealthvsthepharmaceuticalindustry20102019
AT jacksonmatthewj comparisonofresearchspendingonnewdrugapprovalsbythenationalinstitutesofhealthvsthepharmaceuticalindustry20102019
AT zhouedwardw comparisonofresearchspendingonnewdrugapprovalsbythenationalinstitutesofhealthvsthepharmaceuticalindustry20102019
AT ledleyfredd comparisonofresearchspendingonnewdrugapprovalsbythenationalinstitutesofhealthvsthepharmaceuticalindustry20102019