Cargando…

Comparisons of objective and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia using binocular wavefront optometer with autorefraction and retinoscopy in school-age children

PURPOSE: To compare school-age children’s objective and subjective refraction using a binocular wavefront optometer (BWFOM) with autorefraction and retinoscopy before and after cycloplegia. METHODS: Eighty-six eyes from 86 children (6–15 years old) were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. BWFOM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lei, Yadi, Chen, Xun, Cheng, Mingrui, Li, Boliang, Jiang, Yinjie, Xu, Yilin, Wang, Xiaoying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10148772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36527496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05936-8
_version_ 1785035043282878464
author Lei, Yadi
Chen, Xun
Cheng, Mingrui
Li, Boliang
Jiang, Yinjie
Xu, Yilin
Wang, Xiaoying
author_facet Lei, Yadi
Chen, Xun
Cheng, Mingrui
Li, Boliang
Jiang, Yinjie
Xu, Yilin
Wang, Xiaoying
author_sort Lei, Yadi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare school-age children’s objective and subjective refraction using a binocular wavefront optometer (BWFOM) with autorefraction and retinoscopy before and after cycloplegia. METHODS: Eighty-six eyes from 86 children (6–15 years old) were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. BWFOM objective and subjective refractions were compared with autorefraction and retinoscopy under cycloplegia. BWFOM refraction was evaluated before and after cycloplegia. Measurements were compared using a paired t-test; agreement was assessed using Bland–Altman plots. RESULTS: Under cycloplegia, the sphere, spherical equivalence, and J45 were significantly more negative on BWFOM objective refraction than autorefraction (− 1.39 ± 2.20 D vs. − 1.28 ± 2.23 D, P = 0.003; − 1.84 ± 2.38 D vs. − 1.72 ± 2.43 D, P = 0.001; − 0.02 ± 0.17 D vs. 0.03 ± 0.21 D, P = 0.004). The subjective sphere of BWFOM was less myopic, and the cylinder and the J45 were more negative than those with retinoscopy (− 1.17 ± 2.09 D vs. − 1.25 ± 2.20 D, P = 0.02; − 0.91 ± 0.92 D vs. − 0.76 ± 0.92 D, P < 0.001; − 0.01 ± 0.15 D vs. 0.03 ± 0.21 D, P = 0.028). For both BWFOM objective and subjective refraction, sphere and spherical equivalence with noncycloplegia were more myopic than those with cycloplegia (objective: − 1.76 ± 2.10 D vs. − 1.39 ± 2.20 D, − 2.21 ± 2.30 D vs. − 1.84 ± 2.38 D, P < 0.001; subjective: − 1.57 ± 1.92 D vs. − 1.17 ± 2.09 D, − 2.01 ± 2.13 D vs. − 1.62 ± 2.27 D, P < 0.001). Bland–Altman plots showed good agreement in spherical equivalence between BWFOM objective refraction and autorefraction (mean difference = 0.12 D, 95% confidence interval [CI] − 0.52 to 0.76), subjective refraction with retinoscopy (mean difference =  − 0.01 D, 95% CI − 0.65 to 0.64), and BWFOM refractions with or without cycloplegia (objective: mean difference =  − 0.37 D, 95% CI − 1.31 to 0.57; subjective: mean difference =  − 0.39 D, 95% CI − 1.30 to 0.51). The time cost by BWFOM was significantly less than the total time of autorefraction and retinoscopy (264.88 ± 90.67 s vs. 315.89 ± 95.31 s, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: BWFOM is a new device that realizes both objective and subjective refraction. For children’s refractive errors, it is more convenient and quicker to obtain the proper prescription at a 0.05-D interval, and it is more accurate than autorefraction and retinoscopy under cycloplegia. [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10148772
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101487722023-05-01 Comparisons of objective and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia using binocular wavefront optometer with autorefraction and retinoscopy in school-age children Lei, Yadi Chen, Xun Cheng, Mingrui Li, Boliang Jiang, Yinjie Xu, Yilin Wang, Xiaoying Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Pediatrics PURPOSE: To compare school-age children’s objective and subjective refraction using a binocular wavefront optometer (BWFOM) with autorefraction and retinoscopy before and after cycloplegia. METHODS: Eighty-six eyes from 86 children (6–15 years old) were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. BWFOM objective and subjective refractions were compared with autorefraction and retinoscopy under cycloplegia. BWFOM refraction was evaluated before and after cycloplegia. Measurements were compared using a paired t-test; agreement was assessed using Bland–Altman plots. RESULTS: Under cycloplegia, the sphere, spherical equivalence, and J45 were significantly more negative on BWFOM objective refraction than autorefraction (− 1.39 ± 2.20 D vs. − 1.28 ± 2.23 D, P = 0.003; − 1.84 ± 2.38 D vs. − 1.72 ± 2.43 D, P = 0.001; − 0.02 ± 0.17 D vs. 0.03 ± 0.21 D, P = 0.004). The subjective sphere of BWFOM was less myopic, and the cylinder and the J45 were more negative than those with retinoscopy (− 1.17 ± 2.09 D vs. − 1.25 ± 2.20 D, P = 0.02; − 0.91 ± 0.92 D vs. − 0.76 ± 0.92 D, P < 0.001; − 0.01 ± 0.15 D vs. 0.03 ± 0.21 D, P = 0.028). For both BWFOM objective and subjective refraction, sphere and spherical equivalence with noncycloplegia were more myopic than those with cycloplegia (objective: − 1.76 ± 2.10 D vs. − 1.39 ± 2.20 D, − 2.21 ± 2.30 D vs. − 1.84 ± 2.38 D, P < 0.001; subjective: − 1.57 ± 1.92 D vs. − 1.17 ± 2.09 D, − 2.01 ± 2.13 D vs. − 1.62 ± 2.27 D, P < 0.001). Bland–Altman plots showed good agreement in spherical equivalence between BWFOM objective refraction and autorefraction (mean difference = 0.12 D, 95% confidence interval [CI] − 0.52 to 0.76), subjective refraction with retinoscopy (mean difference =  − 0.01 D, 95% CI − 0.65 to 0.64), and BWFOM refractions with or without cycloplegia (objective: mean difference =  − 0.37 D, 95% CI − 1.31 to 0.57; subjective: mean difference =  − 0.39 D, 95% CI − 1.30 to 0.51). The time cost by BWFOM was significantly less than the total time of autorefraction and retinoscopy (264.88 ± 90.67 s vs. 315.89 ± 95.31 s, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: BWFOM is a new device that realizes both objective and subjective refraction. For children’s refractive errors, it is more convenient and quicker to obtain the proper prescription at a 0.05-D interval, and it is more accurate than autorefraction and retinoscopy under cycloplegia. [Image: see text] Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-12-17 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10148772/ /pubmed/36527496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05936-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Lei, Yadi
Chen, Xun
Cheng, Mingrui
Li, Boliang
Jiang, Yinjie
Xu, Yilin
Wang, Xiaoying
Comparisons of objective and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia using binocular wavefront optometer with autorefraction and retinoscopy in school-age children
title Comparisons of objective and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia using binocular wavefront optometer with autorefraction and retinoscopy in school-age children
title_full Comparisons of objective and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia using binocular wavefront optometer with autorefraction and retinoscopy in school-age children
title_fullStr Comparisons of objective and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia using binocular wavefront optometer with autorefraction and retinoscopy in school-age children
title_full_unstemmed Comparisons of objective and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia using binocular wavefront optometer with autorefraction and retinoscopy in school-age children
title_short Comparisons of objective and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia using binocular wavefront optometer with autorefraction and retinoscopy in school-age children
title_sort comparisons of objective and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia using binocular wavefront optometer with autorefraction and retinoscopy in school-age children
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10148772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36527496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00417-022-05936-8
work_keys_str_mv AT leiyadi comparisonsofobjectiveandsubjectiverefractionwithandwithoutcycloplegiausingbinocularwavefrontoptometerwithautorefractionandretinoscopyinschoolagechildren
AT chenxun comparisonsofobjectiveandsubjectiverefractionwithandwithoutcycloplegiausingbinocularwavefrontoptometerwithautorefractionandretinoscopyinschoolagechildren
AT chengmingrui comparisonsofobjectiveandsubjectiverefractionwithandwithoutcycloplegiausingbinocularwavefrontoptometerwithautorefractionandretinoscopyinschoolagechildren
AT liboliang comparisonsofobjectiveandsubjectiverefractionwithandwithoutcycloplegiausingbinocularwavefrontoptometerwithautorefractionandretinoscopyinschoolagechildren
AT jiangyinjie comparisonsofobjectiveandsubjectiverefractionwithandwithoutcycloplegiausingbinocularwavefrontoptometerwithautorefractionandretinoscopyinschoolagechildren
AT xuyilin comparisonsofobjectiveandsubjectiverefractionwithandwithoutcycloplegiausingbinocularwavefrontoptometerwithautorefractionandretinoscopyinschoolagechildren
AT wangxiaoying comparisonsofobjectiveandsubjectiverefractionwithandwithoutcycloplegiausingbinocularwavefrontoptometerwithautorefractionandretinoscopyinschoolagechildren