Cargando…

Prospective Memory Training in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Prospective memory (PM), which enables one to remember to carry out delayed intentions, is crucial for everyday functioning. PM commonly deteriorates upon cognitive decline in older adults, but several studies have shown that PM in older adults can be improved by training. The current study aimed to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tse, Zita C. K., Cao, Yuan, Ogilvie, James M., Chau, Bolton K. H., Ng, Daphne H. C., Shum, David H. K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10148783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35543836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11065-022-09536-5
_version_ 1785035045668388864
author Tse, Zita C. K.
Cao, Yuan
Ogilvie, James M.
Chau, Bolton K. H.
Ng, Daphne H. C.
Shum, David H. K.
author_facet Tse, Zita C. K.
Cao, Yuan
Ogilvie, James M.
Chau, Bolton K. H.
Ng, Daphne H. C.
Shum, David H. K.
author_sort Tse, Zita C. K.
collection PubMed
description Prospective memory (PM), which enables one to remember to carry out delayed intentions, is crucial for everyday functioning. PM commonly deteriorates upon cognitive decline in older adults, but several studies have shown that PM in older adults can be improved by training. The current study aimed to summarise this evidence by conducting a qualitative systematic analysis and quantitative meta-analysis of the effects of PM training in older adults, for which systematic searches were conducted across seven databases (Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, CINAHL and Scopus). Forty-eight studies were included in the qualitative analysis, and 43% of the assessed PM training interventions showed positive gains in enhancing PM. However, the methodological quality varied across the studies, with 41% of the non-randomised control trials (non-RCTs) rated as having either serious or critical risk of bias. Therefore, only 29 RCTs were included in the subsequent quantitative meta-analysis. We found a significant and moderate immediate efficacy (Hedges’ g = 0.54) of PM training in enhancing PM performance in older adults, but no significant long-term efficacy (Hedges’ g = 0.20). Two subgroup analyses also revealed a robust training efficacy across the study population (i.e., healthy and clinical population) and the number of training sessions (i.e., single session and programme-based). Overall, this study provided positive evidence to support PM training in older adults. Further studies are warranted to explore the mechanisms by which PM training exerts its effects, and better-quality RCTs are needed to provide more robust evidence supporting our findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11065-022-09536-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10148783
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101487832023-05-01 Prospective Memory Training in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Tse, Zita C. K. Cao, Yuan Ogilvie, James M. Chau, Bolton K. H. Ng, Daphne H. C. Shum, David H. K. Neuropsychol Rev Review Prospective memory (PM), which enables one to remember to carry out delayed intentions, is crucial for everyday functioning. PM commonly deteriorates upon cognitive decline in older adults, but several studies have shown that PM in older adults can be improved by training. The current study aimed to summarise this evidence by conducting a qualitative systematic analysis and quantitative meta-analysis of the effects of PM training in older adults, for which systematic searches were conducted across seven databases (Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, CINAHL and Scopus). Forty-eight studies were included in the qualitative analysis, and 43% of the assessed PM training interventions showed positive gains in enhancing PM. However, the methodological quality varied across the studies, with 41% of the non-randomised control trials (non-RCTs) rated as having either serious or critical risk of bias. Therefore, only 29 RCTs were included in the subsequent quantitative meta-analysis. We found a significant and moderate immediate efficacy (Hedges’ g = 0.54) of PM training in enhancing PM performance in older adults, but no significant long-term efficacy (Hedges’ g = 0.20). Two subgroup analyses also revealed a robust training efficacy across the study population (i.e., healthy and clinical population) and the number of training sessions (i.e., single session and programme-based). Overall, this study provided positive evidence to support PM training in older adults. Further studies are warranted to explore the mechanisms by which PM training exerts its effects, and better-quality RCTs are needed to provide more robust evidence supporting our findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11065-022-09536-5. Springer US 2022-05-11 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10148783/ /pubmed/35543836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11065-022-09536-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Tse, Zita C. K.
Cao, Yuan
Ogilvie, James M.
Chau, Bolton K. H.
Ng, Daphne H. C.
Shum, David H. K.
Prospective Memory Training in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Prospective Memory Training in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Prospective Memory Training in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Prospective Memory Training in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prospective Memory Training in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Prospective Memory Training in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort prospective memory training in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10148783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35543836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11065-022-09536-5
work_keys_str_mv AT tsezitack prospectivememorytraininginolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT caoyuan prospectivememorytraininginolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ogilviejamesm prospectivememorytraininginolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT chauboltonkh prospectivememorytraininginolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ngdaphnehc prospectivememorytraininginolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT shumdavidhk prospectivememorytraininginolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis