Cargando…
Prospective Memory Training in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Prospective memory (PM), which enables one to remember to carry out delayed intentions, is crucial for everyday functioning. PM commonly deteriorates upon cognitive decline in older adults, but several studies have shown that PM in older adults can be improved by training. The current study aimed to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10148783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35543836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11065-022-09536-5 |
_version_ | 1785035045668388864 |
---|---|
author | Tse, Zita C. K. Cao, Yuan Ogilvie, James M. Chau, Bolton K. H. Ng, Daphne H. C. Shum, David H. K. |
author_facet | Tse, Zita C. K. Cao, Yuan Ogilvie, James M. Chau, Bolton K. H. Ng, Daphne H. C. Shum, David H. K. |
author_sort | Tse, Zita C. K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prospective memory (PM), which enables one to remember to carry out delayed intentions, is crucial for everyday functioning. PM commonly deteriorates upon cognitive decline in older adults, but several studies have shown that PM in older adults can be improved by training. The current study aimed to summarise this evidence by conducting a qualitative systematic analysis and quantitative meta-analysis of the effects of PM training in older adults, for which systematic searches were conducted across seven databases (Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, CINAHL and Scopus). Forty-eight studies were included in the qualitative analysis, and 43% of the assessed PM training interventions showed positive gains in enhancing PM. However, the methodological quality varied across the studies, with 41% of the non-randomised control trials (non-RCTs) rated as having either serious or critical risk of bias. Therefore, only 29 RCTs were included in the subsequent quantitative meta-analysis. We found a significant and moderate immediate efficacy (Hedges’ g = 0.54) of PM training in enhancing PM performance in older adults, but no significant long-term efficacy (Hedges’ g = 0.20). Two subgroup analyses also revealed a robust training efficacy across the study population (i.e., healthy and clinical population) and the number of training sessions (i.e., single session and programme-based). Overall, this study provided positive evidence to support PM training in older adults. Further studies are warranted to explore the mechanisms by which PM training exerts its effects, and better-quality RCTs are needed to provide more robust evidence supporting our findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11065-022-09536-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10148783 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101487832023-05-01 Prospective Memory Training in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Tse, Zita C. K. Cao, Yuan Ogilvie, James M. Chau, Bolton K. H. Ng, Daphne H. C. Shum, David H. K. Neuropsychol Rev Review Prospective memory (PM), which enables one to remember to carry out delayed intentions, is crucial for everyday functioning. PM commonly deteriorates upon cognitive decline in older adults, but several studies have shown that PM in older adults can be improved by training. The current study aimed to summarise this evidence by conducting a qualitative systematic analysis and quantitative meta-analysis of the effects of PM training in older adults, for which systematic searches were conducted across seven databases (Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, PsycInfo, Web of Science, CINAHL and Scopus). Forty-eight studies were included in the qualitative analysis, and 43% of the assessed PM training interventions showed positive gains in enhancing PM. However, the methodological quality varied across the studies, with 41% of the non-randomised control trials (non-RCTs) rated as having either serious or critical risk of bias. Therefore, only 29 RCTs were included in the subsequent quantitative meta-analysis. We found a significant and moderate immediate efficacy (Hedges’ g = 0.54) of PM training in enhancing PM performance in older adults, but no significant long-term efficacy (Hedges’ g = 0.20). Two subgroup analyses also revealed a robust training efficacy across the study population (i.e., healthy and clinical population) and the number of training sessions (i.e., single session and programme-based). Overall, this study provided positive evidence to support PM training in older adults. Further studies are warranted to explore the mechanisms by which PM training exerts its effects, and better-quality RCTs are needed to provide more robust evidence supporting our findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11065-022-09536-5. Springer US 2022-05-11 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10148783/ /pubmed/35543836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11065-022-09536-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Tse, Zita C. K. Cao, Yuan Ogilvie, James M. Chau, Bolton K. H. Ng, Daphne H. C. Shum, David H. K. Prospective Memory Training in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Prospective Memory Training in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Prospective Memory Training in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Prospective Memory Training in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Prospective Memory Training in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Prospective Memory Training in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | prospective memory training in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10148783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35543836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11065-022-09536-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tsezitack prospectivememorytraininginolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT caoyuan prospectivememorytraininginolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ogilviejamesm prospectivememorytraininginolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT chauboltonkh prospectivememorytraininginolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ngdaphnehc prospectivememorytraininginolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT shumdavidhk prospectivememorytraininginolderadultsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |