Cargando…

The impact of artificial intelligence on the reading times of radiologists for chest radiographs

Whether the utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) during the interpretation of chest radiographs (CXRs) would affect the radiologists’ workload is of particular interest. Therefore, this prospective observational study aimed to observe how AI affected the reading times of radiologists in the d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shin, Hyun Joo, Han, Kyunghwa, Ryu, Leeha, Kim, Eun-Kyung
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10148851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37120423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00829-4
_version_ 1785035059733987328
author Shin, Hyun Joo
Han, Kyunghwa
Ryu, Leeha
Kim, Eun-Kyung
author_facet Shin, Hyun Joo
Han, Kyunghwa
Ryu, Leeha
Kim, Eun-Kyung
author_sort Shin, Hyun Joo
collection PubMed
description Whether the utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) during the interpretation of chest radiographs (CXRs) would affect the radiologists’ workload is of particular interest. Therefore, this prospective observational study aimed to observe how AI affected the reading times of radiologists in the daily interpretation of CXRs. Radiologists who agreed to have the reading times of their CXR interpretations collected from September to December 2021 were recruited. Reading time was defined as the duration in seconds from opening CXRs to transcribing the image by the same radiologist. As commercial AI software was integrated for all CXRs, the radiologists could refer to AI results for 2 months (AI-aided period). During the other 2 months, the radiologists were automatically blinded to the AI results (AI-unaided period). A total of 11 radiologists participated, and 18,680 CXRs were included. Total reading times were significantly shortened with AI use, compared to no use (13.3 s vs. 14.8 s, p < 0.001). When there was no abnormality detected by AI, reading times were shorter with AI use (mean 10.8 s vs. 13.1 s, p < 0.001). However, if any abnormality was detected by AI, reading times did not differ according to AI use (mean 18.6 s vs. 18.4 s, p = 0.452). Reading times increased as abnormality scores increased, and a more significant increase was observed with AI use (coefficient 0.09 vs. 0.06, p < 0.001). Therefore, the reading times of CXRs among radiologists were influenced by the availability of AI. Overall reading times shortened when radiologists referred to AI; however, abnormalities detected by AI could lengthen reading times.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10148851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101488512023-05-01 The impact of artificial intelligence on the reading times of radiologists for chest radiographs Shin, Hyun Joo Han, Kyunghwa Ryu, Leeha Kim, Eun-Kyung NPJ Digit Med Article Whether the utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) during the interpretation of chest radiographs (CXRs) would affect the radiologists’ workload is of particular interest. Therefore, this prospective observational study aimed to observe how AI affected the reading times of radiologists in the daily interpretation of CXRs. Radiologists who agreed to have the reading times of their CXR interpretations collected from September to December 2021 were recruited. Reading time was defined as the duration in seconds from opening CXRs to transcribing the image by the same radiologist. As commercial AI software was integrated for all CXRs, the radiologists could refer to AI results for 2 months (AI-aided period). During the other 2 months, the radiologists were automatically blinded to the AI results (AI-unaided period). A total of 11 radiologists participated, and 18,680 CXRs were included. Total reading times were significantly shortened with AI use, compared to no use (13.3 s vs. 14.8 s, p < 0.001). When there was no abnormality detected by AI, reading times were shorter with AI use (mean 10.8 s vs. 13.1 s, p < 0.001). However, if any abnormality was detected by AI, reading times did not differ according to AI use (mean 18.6 s vs. 18.4 s, p = 0.452). Reading times increased as abnormality scores increased, and a more significant increase was observed with AI use (coefficient 0.09 vs. 0.06, p < 0.001). Therefore, the reading times of CXRs among radiologists were influenced by the availability of AI. Overall reading times shortened when radiologists referred to AI; however, abnormalities detected by AI could lengthen reading times. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10148851/ /pubmed/37120423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00829-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Shin, Hyun Joo
Han, Kyunghwa
Ryu, Leeha
Kim, Eun-Kyung
The impact of artificial intelligence on the reading times of radiologists for chest radiographs
title The impact of artificial intelligence on the reading times of radiologists for chest radiographs
title_full The impact of artificial intelligence on the reading times of radiologists for chest radiographs
title_fullStr The impact of artificial intelligence on the reading times of radiologists for chest radiographs
title_full_unstemmed The impact of artificial intelligence on the reading times of radiologists for chest radiographs
title_short The impact of artificial intelligence on the reading times of radiologists for chest radiographs
title_sort impact of artificial intelligence on the reading times of radiologists for chest radiographs
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10148851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37120423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00829-4
work_keys_str_mv AT shinhyunjoo theimpactofartificialintelligenceonthereadingtimesofradiologistsforchestradiographs
AT hankyunghwa theimpactofartificialintelligenceonthereadingtimesofradiologistsforchestradiographs
AT ryuleeha theimpactofartificialintelligenceonthereadingtimesofradiologistsforchestradiographs
AT kimeunkyung theimpactofartificialintelligenceonthereadingtimesofradiologistsforchestradiographs
AT shinhyunjoo impactofartificialintelligenceonthereadingtimesofradiologistsforchestradiographs
AT hankyunghwa impactofartificialintelligenceonthereadingtimesofradiologistsforchestradiographs
AT ryuleeha impactofartificialintelligenceonthereadingtimesofradiologistsforchestradiographs
AT kimeunkyung impactofartificialintelligenceonthereadingtimesofradiologistsforchestradiographs