Cargando…
The impact of artificial intelligence on the reading times of radiologists for chest radiographs
Whether the utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) during the interpretation of chest radiographs (CXRs) would affect the radiologists’ workload is of particular interest. Therefore, this prospective observational study aimed to observe how AI affected the reading times of radiologists in the d...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10148851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37120423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00829-4 |
_version_ | 1785035059733987328 |
---|---|
author | Shin, Hyun Joo Han, Kyunghwa Ryu, Leeha Kim, Eun-Kyung |
author_facet | Shin, Hyun Joo Han, Kyunghwa Ryu, Leeha Kim, Eun-Kyung |
author_sort | Shin, Hyun Joo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Whether the utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) during the interpretation of chest radiographs (CXRs) would affect the radiologists’ workload is of particular interest. Therefore, this prospective observational study aimed to observe how AI affected the reading times of radiologists in the daily interpretation of CXRs. Radiologists who agreed to have the reading times of their CXR interpretations collected from September to December 2021 were recruited. Reading time was defined as the duration in seconds from opening CXRs to transcribing the image by the same radiologist. As commercial AI software was integrated for all CXRs, the radiologists could refer to AI results for 2 months (AI-aided period). During the other 2 months, the radiologists were automatically blinded to the AI results (AI-unaided period). A total of 11 radiologists participated, and 18,680 CXRs were included. Total reading times were significantly shortened with AI use, compared to no use (13.3 s vs. 14.8 s, p < 0.001). When there was no abnormality detected by AI, reading times were shorter with AI use (mean 10.8 s vs. 13.1 s, p < 0.001). However, if any abnormality was detected by AI, reading times did not differ according to AI use (mean 18.6 s vs. 18.4 s, p = 0.452). Reading times increased as abnormality scores increased, and a more significant increase was observed with AI use (coefficient 0.09 vs. 0.06, p < 0.001). Therefore, the reading times of CXRs among radiologists were influenced by the availability of AI. Overall reading times shortened when radiologists referred to AI; however, abnormalities detected by AI could lengthen reading times. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10148851 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101488512023-05-01 The impact of artificial intelligence on the reading times of radiologists for chest radiographs Shin, Hyun Joo Han, Kyunghwa Ryu, Leeha Kim, Eun-Kyung NPJ Digit Med Article Whether the utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) during the interpretation of chest radiographs (CXRs) would affect the radiologists’ workload is of particular interest. Therefore, this prospective observational study aimed to observe how AI affected the reading times of radiologists in the daily interpretation of CXRs. Radiologists who agreed to have the reading times of their CXR interpretations collected from September to December 2021 were recruited. Reading time was defined as the duration in seconds from opening CXRs to transcribing the image by the same radiologist. As commercial AI software was integrated for all CXRs, the radiologists could refer to AI results for 2 months (AI-aided period). During the other 2 months, the radiologists were automatically blinded to the AI results (AI-unaided period). A total of 11 radiologists participated, and 18,680 CXRs were included. Total reading times were significantly shortened with AI use, compared to no use (13.3 s vs. 14.8 s, p < 0.001). When there was no abnormality detected by AI, reading times were shorter with AI use (mean 10.8 s vs. 13.1 s, p < 0.001). However, if any abnormality was detected by AI, reading times did not differ according to AI use (mean 18.6 s vs. 18.4 s, p = 0.452). Reading times increased as abnormality scores increased, and a more significant increase was observed with AI use (coefficient 0.09 vs. 0.06, p < 0.001). Therefore, the reading times of CXRs among radiologists were influenced by the availability of AI. Overall reading times shortened when radiologists referred to AI; however, abnormalities detected by AI could lengthen reading times. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10148851/ /pubmed/37120423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00829-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Shin, Hyun Joo Han, Kyunghwa Ryu, Leeha Kim, Eun-Kyung The impact of artificial intelligence on the reading times of radiologists for chest radiographs |
title | The impact of artificial intelligence on the reading times of radiologists for chest radiographs |
title_full | The impact of artificial intelligence on the reading times of radiologists for chest radiographs |
title_fullStr | The impact of artificial intelligence on the reading times of radiologists for chest radiographs |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of artificial intelligence on the reading times of radiologists for chest radiographs |
title_short | The impact of artificial intelligence on the reading times of radiologists for chest radiographs |
title_sort | impact of artificial intelligence on the reading times of radiologists for chest radiographs |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10148851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37120423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00829-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shinhyunjoo theimpactofartificialintelligenceonthereadingtimesofradiologistsforchestradiographs AT hankyunghwa theimpactofartificialintelligenceonthereadingtimesofradiologistsforchestradiographs AT ryuleeha theimpactofartificialintelligenceonthereadingtimesofradiologistsforchestradiographs AT kimeunkyung theimpactofartificialintelligenceonthereadingtimesofradiologistsforchestradiographs AT shinhyunjoo impactofartificialintelligenceonthereadingtimesofradiologistsforchestradiographs AT hankyunghwa impactofartificialintelligenceonthereadingtimesofradiologistsforchestradiographs AT ryuleeha impactofartificialintelligenceonthereadingtimesofradiologistsforchestradiographs AT kimeunkyung impactofartificialintelligenceonthereadingtimesofradiologistsforchestradiographs |