Cargando…
Comparing scrotoplasty complication rates in transgender and cisgender men: An ACS NSQIP study
While masculinizing gender-affirming genital surgeries may include scrotoplasty, there has been limited research on the safety and outcomes of scrotoplasty among transgender men. We compared scrotoplasty complication rates between cisgender and transgender patients using data from the American Colle...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10149324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37139354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2023.03.003 |
_version_ | 1785035141537595392 |
---|---|
author | Saxena, Nimish Jolly, Divya Wu, Catherine A. Boskey, Elizabeth R. Ganor, Oren |
author_facet | Saxena, Nimish Jolly, Divya Wu, Catherine A. Boskey, Elizabeth R. Ganor, Oren |
author_sort | Saxena, Nimish |
collection | PubMed |
description | While masculinizing gender-affirming genital surgeries may include scrotoplasty, there has been limited research on the safety and outcomes of scrotoplasty among transgender men. We compared scrotoplasty complication rates between cisgender and transgender patients using data from the American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Data was queried between 2013 and 2019 for all patients with procedure codes for scrotoplasty. Transgender patients were identified through a gender dysphoria diagnosis code. T-tests and Fisher's exact test were used to identify any differences in demographics, operative characteristics, and outcomes. The primary outcomes of interest were demographic factors, operative details, and surgical outcomes. A total of 234 patients were identified between 2013 and 2019. Fifty were transgender and 184 were cisgender. Age and BMI were significantly different between the two cohorts, such that the cisgender cohort was older (M(trans) = 38 years (SD:14), M(cis) = 53 years (SD: 15)) and had higher BMI than the transgender cohort (M(trans) = 26.9 (SD: 5.5), M(cis) = 35.2 (SD: 11.2)). Cisgender patients also had poorer overall health (p = 0.001), and were more likely to have hypertension (p = 0.001) and diabetes (p = 0.001). Race and ethnicity did not vary significantly between the cohorts. Operative details differed significantly between cohorts, such that transgender patients had a longer operating time (M(trans) = 303 min (SD: 155), M(cis) = 147 min (SD: 107)) and fewer transgender patients had a simple scrotoplasty (p = 0.02). The majority of gender-affirming scrotoplasties were performed by plastic surgeons (62%) whereas the majority of cisgender scrotoplasties were performed by urologists (76%). Despite these demographic and pre-operative differences, the number of patients who underwent complex scrotoplasty experiencing any of the tested complications did not differ by gender. Our results support scrotoplasty as a safe procedure for transgender patients, with no significant differences in outcomes between transgender and cisgender patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10149324 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101493242023-05-02 Comparing scrotoplasty complication rates in transgender and cisgender men: An ACS NSQIP study Saxena, Nimish Jolly, Divya Wu, Catherine A. Boskey, Elizabeth R. Ganor, Oren JPRAS Open Short Communication While masculinizing gender-affirming genital surgeries may include scrotoplasty, there has been limited research on the safety and outcomes of scrotoplasty among transgender men. We compared scrotoplasty complication rates between cisgender and transgender patients using data from the American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Data was queried between 2013 and 2019 for all patients with procedure codes for scrotoplasty. Transgender patients were identified through a gender dysphoria diagnosis code. T-tests and Fisher's exact test were used to identify any differences in demographics, operative characteristics, and outcomes. The primary outcomes of interest were demographic factors, operative details, and surgical outcomes. A total of 234 patients were identified between 2013 and 2019. Fifty were transgender and 184 were cisgender. Age and BMI were significantly different between the two cohorts, such that the cisgender cohort was older (M(trans) = 38 years (SD:14), M(cis) = 53 years (SD: 15)) and had higher BMI than the transgender cohort (M(trans) = 26.9 (SD: 5.5), M(cis) = 35.2 (SD: 11.2)). Cisgender patients also had poorer overall health (p = 0.001), and were more likely to have hypertension (p = 0.001) and diabetes (p = 0.001). Race and ethnicity did not vary significantly between the cohorts. Operative details differed significantly between cohorts, such that transgender patients had a longer operating time (M(trans) = 303 min (SD: 155), M(cis) = 147 min (SD: 107)) and fewer transgender patients had a simple scrotoplasty (p = 0.02). The majority of gender-affirming scrotoplasties were performed by plastic surgeons (62%) whereas the majority of cisgender scrotoplasties were performed by urologists (76%). Despite these demographic and pre-operative differences, the number of patients who underwent complex scrotoplasty experiencing any of the tested complications did not differ by gender. Our results support scrotoplasty as a safe procedure for transgender patients, with no significant differences in outcomes between transgender and cisgender patients. Elsevier 2023-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC10149324/ /pubmed/37139354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2023.03.003 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Short Communication Saxena, Nimish Jolly, Divya Wu, Catherine A. Boskey, Elizabeth R. Ganor, Oren Comparing scrotoplasty complication rates in transgender and cisgender men: An ACS NSQIP study |
title | Comparing scrotoplasty complication rates in transgender and cisgender men: An ACS NSQIP study |
title_full | Comparing scrotoplasty complication rates in transgender and cisgender men: An ACS NSQIP study |
title_fullStr | Comparing scrotoplasty complication rates in transgender and cisgender men: An ACS NSQIP study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing scrotoplasty complication rates in transgender and cisgender men: An ACS NSQIP study |
title_short | Comparing scrotoplasty complication rates in transgender and cisgender men: An ACS NSQIP study |
title_sort | comparing scrotoplasty complication rates in transgender and cisgender men: an acs nsqip study |
topic | Short Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10149324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37139354 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2023.03.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saxenanimish comparingscrotoplastycomplicationratesintransgenderandcisgendermenanacsnsqipstudy AT jollydivya comparingscrotoplastycomplicationratesintransgenderandcisgendermenanacsnsqipstudy AT wucatherinea comparingscrotoplastycomplicationratesintransgenderandcisgendermenanacsnsqipstudy AT boskeyelizabethr comparingscrotoplastycomplicationratesintransgenderandcisgendermenanacsnsqipstudy AT ganororen comparingscrotoplastycomplicationratesintransgenderandcisgendermenanacsnsqipstudy |