Cargando…
Interpretation of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Breakpoints: Analysis of Agreement
Objectives: Breakpoints provided by European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) are now being used in many countries. This study was planned to ascertain the agreement in antimicrobial susceptibility using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and EUCAST brea...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10149341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37139290 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36977 |
_version_ | 1785035145522184192 |
---|---|
author | Gaur, Priyanka Hada, Vivek Rath, Rama S Mohanty, Aroop Singh, Parul Rukadikar, Atul |
author_facet | Gaur, Priyanka Hada, Vivek Rath, Rama S Mohanty, Aroop Singh, Parul Rukadikar, Atul |
author_sort | Gaur, Priyanka |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives: Breakpoints provided by European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) are now being used in many countries. This study was planned to ascertain the agreement in antimicrobial susceptibility using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and EUCAST breakpoints during the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. Methods: This was a prospective observational study. Clinical isolates belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae recovered between January and December, 2022, were included in the analysis. The diameter of the zone of inhibition of the 14 antimicrobials (viz. amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefazolin, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, cefixime, aztreonam, meropenem, gentamicin, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, norfloxacin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and fosfomycin) was analysed. Antimicrobial susceptibility was interpreted using CLSI 2022 and EUCAST 2022 guidelines. Results: Susceptibility data from a total of 356 isolates showed a slight increase in the percentage of resistant isolates with most of the drugs using EUCAST guidelines. The level of agreement varied from almost perfect to slight. For two drugs, i.e., fosfomycin and cefazolin, the agreement was least among the drug analysed (kappa (κ) value < 0.5, p < 0.001). For Ceftriaxone and Aztreonam, with EUCAST, susceptible (S) isolates would have been categorised in the newly redefined "I" category. It would have indicated the use of higher dosages of drugs. Conclusion: Change in the breakpoints impacts the interpretation of the susceptibility. It can also lead to a change in the dosage of the drug used for treatment. Therefore, there is an urgent need to see the impact of recent modifications "I" category of EUCAST on the clinical outcome and usage of antimicrobials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10149341 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101493412023-05-02 Interpretation of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Breakpoints: Analysis of Agreement Gaur, Priyanka Hada, Vivek Rath, Rama S Mohanty, Aroop Singh, Parul Rukadikar, Atul Cureus Infectious Disease Objectives: Breakpoints provided by European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) are now being used in many countries. This study was planned to ascertain the agreement in antimicrobial susceptibility using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and EUCAST breakpoints during the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. Methods: This was a prospective observational study. Clinical isolates belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae recovered between January and December, 2022, were included in the analysis. The diameter of the zone of inhibition of the 14 antimicrobials (viz. amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefazolin, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime, cefixime, aztreonam, meropenem, gentamicin, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, norfloxacin, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and fosfomycin) was analysed. Antimicrobial susceptibility was interpreted using CLSI 2022 and EUCAST 2022 guidelines. Results: Susceptibility data from a total of 356 isolates showed a slight increase in the percentage of resistant isolates with most of the drugs using EUCAST guidelines. The level of agreement varied from almost perfect to slight. For two drugs, i.e., fosfomycin and cefazolin, the agreement was least among the drug analysed (kappa (κ) value < 0.5, p < 0.001). For Ceftriaxone and Aztreonam, with EUCAST, susceptible (S) isolates would have been categorised in the newly redefined "I" category. It would have indicated the use of higher dosages of drugs. Conclusion: Change in the breakpoints impacts the interpretation of the susceptibility. It can also lead to a change in the dosage of the drug used for treatment. Therefore, there is an urgent need to see the impact of recent modifications "I" category of EUCAST on the clinical outcome and usage of antimicrobials. Cureus 2023-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10149341/ /pubmed/37139290 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36977 Text en Copyright © 2023, Gaur et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Infectious Disease Gaur, Priyanka Hada, Vivek Rath, Rama S Mohanty, Aroop Singh, Parul Rukadikar, Atul Interpretation of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Breakpoints: Analysis of Agreement |
title | Interpretation of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Breakpoints: Analysis of Agreement |
title_full | Interpretation of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Breakpoints: Analysis of Agreement |
title_fullStr | Interpretation of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Breakpoints: Analysis of Agreement |
title_full_unstemmed | Interpretation of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Breakpoints: Analysis of Agreement |
title_short | Interpretation of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Breakpoints: Analysis of Agreement |
title_sort | interpretation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing using european committee on antimicrobial susceptibility testing (eucast) and clinical and laboratory standards institute (clsi) breakpoints: analysis of agreement |
topic | Infectious Disease |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10149341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37139290 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36977 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gaurpriyanka interpretationofantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingusingeuropeancommitteeonantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingeucastandclinicalandlaboratorystandardsinstituteclsibreakpointsanalysisofagreement AT hadavivek interpretationofantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingusingeuropeancommitteeonantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingeucastandclinicalandlaboratorystandardsinstituteclsibreakpointsanalysisofagreement AT rathramas interpretationofantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingusingeuropeancommitteeonantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingeucastandclinicalandlaboratorystandardsinstituteclsibreakpointsanalysisofagreement AT mohantyaroop interpretationofantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingusingeuropeancommitteeonantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingeucastandclinicalandlaboratorystandardsinstituteclsibreakpointsanalysisofagreement AT singhparul interpretationofantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingusingeuropeancommitteeonantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingeucastandclinicalandlaboratorystandardsinstituteclsibreakpointsanalysisofagreement AT rukadikaratul interpretationofantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingusingeuropeancommitteeonantimicrobialsusceptibilitytestingeucastandclinicalandlaboratorystandardsinstituteclsibreakpointsanalysisofagreement |