Cargando…

Russia’s Approach to Connectivity in Asia: From Cooperation to Coercion

Russia’s foreign policy concept, last updated in 2023, envisioned economic and political cooperation with countries of the Asia-Pacific as important for advancing Russia’s agenda as a global power and emphasised the need to improve connectivity across Eurasia. This article applies a novel theoretica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silvan, Kristiina, Kaczmarski, Marcin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10149641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37363617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12140-023-09404-w
_version_ 1785035185147871232
author Silvan, Kristiina
Kaczmarski, Marcin
author_facet Silvan, Kristiina
Kaczmarski, Marcin
author_sort Silvan, Kristiina
collection PubMed
description Russia’s foreign policy concept, last updated in 2023, envisioned economic and political cooperation with countries of the Asia-Pacific as important for advancing Russia’s agenda as a global power and emphasised the need to improve connectivity across Eurasia. This article applies a novel theoretical framework for analysing Russia’s approach to connectivity in Asia since the collapse of the Soviet Union. Drawing from policy documents and secondary sources, the article identifies three different geographical spaces targeted by Russian connectivity policy: East of the Russian Federation, post-Soviet Central Asia, and Greater Eurasia. It is argued that the attempts to improve the cooperative connectivity of the Russian Far East have been half-hearted. In contrast, the attempt to retain and rebuild connectivity within the post-Soviet space has followed the logics of competition, containment, and coercion. Moreover, by promoting the Greater Eurasian Partnership, Russia has sought to keep status equality with China against the backdrop of the latter’s Belt and Road Initiative. The article maintains that Russia is a connectivity actor of its own right, even if there is a major gap between its connectivity strategy and its implementation. It further suggests that the war in Ukraine has accelerated the trend towards coercion and disconnectivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10149641
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101496412023-05-02 Russia’s Approach to Connectivity in Asia: From Cooperation to Coercion Silvan, Kristiina Kaczmarski, Marcin East Asia (Piscataway) Manuscript Russia’s foreign policy concept, last updated in 2023, envisioned economic and political cooperation with countries of the Asia-Pacific as important for advancing Russia’s agenda as a global power and emphasised the need to improve connectivity across Eurasia. This article applies a novel theoretical framework for analysing Russia’s approach to connectivity in Asia since the collapse of the Soviet Union. Drawing from policy documents and secondary sources, the article identifies three different geographical spaces targeted by Russian connectivity policy: East of the Russian Federation, post-Soviet Central Asia, and Greater Eurasia. It is argued that the attempts to improve the cooperative connectivity of the Russian Far East have been half-hearted. In contrast, the attempt to retain and rebuild connectivity within the post-Soviet space has followed the logics of competition, containment, and coercion. Moreover, by promoting the Greater Eurasian Partnership, Russia has sought to keep status equality with China against the backdrop of the latter’s Belt and Road Initiative. The article maintains that Russia is a connectivity actor of its own right, even if there is a major gap between its connectivity strategy and its implementation. It further suggests that the war in Ukraine has accelerated the trend towards coercion and disconnectivity. Springer Netherlands 2023-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10149641/ /pubmed/37363617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12140-023-09404-w Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Manuscript
Silvan, Kristiina
Kaczmarski, Marcin
Russia’s Approach to Connectivity in Asia: From Cooperation to Coercion
title Russia’s Approach to Connectivity in Asia: From Cooperation to Coercion
title_full Russia’s Approach to Connectivity in Asia: From Cooperation to Coercion
title_fullStr Russia’s Approach to Connectivity in Asia: From Cooperation to Coercion
title_full_unstemmed Russia’s Approach to Connectivity in Asia: From Cooperation to Coercion
title_short Russia’s Approach to Connectivity in Asia: From Cooperation to Coercion
title_sort russia’s approach to connectivity in asia: from cooperation to coercion
topic Manuscript
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10149641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37363617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12140-023-09404-w
work_keys_str_mv AT silvankristiina russiasapproachtoconnectivityinasiafromcooperationtocoercion
AT kaczmarskimarcin russiasapproachtoconnectivityinasiafromcooperationtocoercion