Cargando…

Would the Real Loneliness Please Stand Up? The Validity of Loneliness Scores and the Reliability of Single-Item Scores

Several measures that assess loneliness have been developed for adults. Across three studies, we investigated psychometric features of scores of different versions of the Rasch-Type Loneliness Scale, the University of California Los Angeles Loneliness Scale, and three single-item measures. In Study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mund, Marcus, Maes, Marlies, Drewke, Pia M., Gutzeit, Antonia, Jaki, Isabel, Qualter, Pamela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10149889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35246009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10731911221077227
_version_ 1785035244430163968
author Mund, Marcus
Maes, Marlies
Drewke, Pia M.
Gutzeit, Antonia
Jaki, Isabel
Qualter, Pamela
author_facet Mund, Marcus
Maes, Marlies
Drewke, Pia M.
Gutzeit, Antonia
Jaki, Isabel
Qualter, Pamela
author_sort Mund, Marcus
collection PubMed
description Several measures that assess loneliness have been developed for adults. Across three studies, we investigated psychometric features of scores of different versions of the Rasch-Type Loneliness Scale, the University of California Los Angeles Loneliness Scale, and three single-item measures. In Study 1 (N = 697 self-ratings, N = 282 informant-ratings of 160 targets) and Study 2 (N = 1,216 individuals from 608 couples), we investigated convergent validity, self-informant agreement, and nomological nets of the item scores using correlates related to demographic aspects, personality, satisfaction, and network characteristics. In Study 3 (N = 411), we estimated a reliability of [Formula: see text] for scores of three single-item measures of loneliness. Overall, scores of all measures and their nomological nets were highly correlated within and across studies, indicating that the scores of the included measures are all reliable and valid. Recommendations for choosing a loneliness measure are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10149889
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101498892023-05-02 Would the Real Loneliness Please Stand Up? The Validity of Loneliness Scores and the Reliability of Single-Item Scores Mund, Marcus Maes, Marlies Drewke, Pia M. Gutzeit, Antonia Jaki, Isabel Qualter, Pamela Assessment Articles Several measures that assess loneliness have been developed for adults. Across three studies, we investigated psychometric features of scores of different versions of the Rasch-Type Loneliness Scale, the University of California Los Angeles Loneliness Scale, and three single-item measures. In Study 1 (N = 697 self-ratings, N = 282 informant-ratings of 160 targets) and Study 2 (N = 1,216 individuals from 608 couples), we investigated convergent validity, self-informant agreement, and nomological nets of the item scores using correlates related to demographic aspects, personality, satisfaction, and network characteristics. In Study 3 (N = 411), we estimated a reliability of [Formula: see text] for scores of three single-item measures of loneliness. Overall, scores of all measures and their nomological nets were highly correlated within and across studies, indicating that the scores of the included measures are all reliable and valid. Recommendations for choosing a loneliness measure are discussed. SAGE Publications 2022-03-04 2023-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10149889/ /pubmed/35246009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10731911221077227 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Articles
Mund, Marcus
Maes, Marlies
Drewke, Pia M.
Gutzeit, Antonia
Jaki, Isabel
Qualter, Pamela
Would the Real Loneliness Please Stand Up? The Validity of Loneliness Scores and the Reliability of Single-Item Scores
title Would the Real Loneliness Please Stand Up? The Validity of Loneliness Scores and the Reliability of Single-Item Scores
title_full Would the Real Loneliness Please Stand Up? The Validity of Loneliness Scores and the Reliability of Single-Item Scores
title_fullStr Would the Real Loneliness Please Stand Up? The Validity of Loneliness Scores and the Reliability of Single-Item Scores
title_full_unstemmed Would the Real Loneliness Please Stand Up? The Validity of Loneliness Scores and the Reliability of Single-Item Scores
title_short Would the Real Loneliness Please Stand Up? The Validity of Loneliness Scores and the Reliability of Single-Item Scores
title_sort would the real loneliness please stand up? the validity of loneliness scores and the reliability of single-item scores
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10149889/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35246009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10731911221077227
work_keys_str_mv AT mundmarcus wouldthereallonelinesspleasestandupthevalidityoflonelinessscoresandthereliabilityofsingleitemscores
AT maesmarlies wouldthereallonelinesspleasestandupthevalidityoflonelinessscoresandthereliabilityofsingleitemscores
AT drewkepiam wouldthereallonelinesspleasestandupthevalidityoflonelinessscoresandthereliabilityofsingleitemscores
AT gutzeitantonia wouldthereallonelinesspleasestandupthevalidityoflonelinessscoresandthereliabilityofsingleitemscores
AT jakiisabel wouldthereallonelinesspleasestandupthevalidityoflonelinessscoresandthereliabilityofsingleitemscores
AT qualterpamela wouldthereallonelinesspleasestandupthevalidityoflonelinessscoresandthereliabilityofsingleitemscores