Cargando…
Would the Real Loneliness Please Stand Up? The Validity of Loneliness Scores and the Reliability of Single-Item Scores
Several measures that assess loneliness have been developed for adults. Across three studies, we investigated psychometric features of scores of different versions of the Rasch-Type Loneliness Scale, the University of California Los Angeles Loneliness Scale, and three single-item measures. In Study...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10149889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35246009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10731911221077227 |
_version_ | 1785035244430163968 |
---|---|
author | Mund, Marcus Maes, Marlies Drewke, Pia M. Gutzeit, Antonia Jaki, Isabel Qualter, Pamela |
author_facet | Mund, Marcus Maes, Marlies Drewke, Pia M. Gutzeit, Antonia Jaki, Isabel Qualter, Pamela |
author_sort | Mund, Marcus |
collection | PubMed |
description | Several measures that assess loneliness have been developed for adults. Across three studies, we investigated psychometric features of scores of different versions of the Rasch-Type Loneliness Scale, the University of California Los Angeles Loneliness Scale, and three single-item measures. In Study 1 (N = 697 self-ratings, N = 282 informant-ratings of 160 targets) and Study 2 (N = 1,216 individuals from 608 couples), we investigated convergent validity, self-informant agreement, and nomological nets of the item scores using correlates related to demographic aspects, personality, satisfaction, and network characteristics. In Study 3 (N = 411), we estimated a reliability of [Formula: see text] for scores of three single-item measures of loneliness. Overall, scores of all measures and their nomological nets were highly correlated within and across studies, indicating that the scores of the included measures are all reliable and valid. Recommendations for choosing a loneliness measure are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10149889 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101498892023-05-02 Would the Real Loneliness Please Stand Up? The Validity of Loneliness Scores and the Reliability of Single-Item Scores Mund, Marcus Maes, Marlies Drewke, Pia M. Gutzeit, Antonia Jaki, Isabel Qualter, Pamela Assessment Articles Several measures that assess loneliness have been developed for adults. Across three studies, we investigated psychometric features of scores of different versions of the Rasch-Type Loneliness Scale, the University of California Los Angeles Loneliness Scale, and three single-item measures. In Study 1 (N = 697 self-ratings, N = 282 informant-ratings of 160 targets) and Study 2 (N = 1,216 individuals from 608 couples), we investigated convergent validity, self-informant agreement, and nomological nets of the item scores using correlates related to demographic aspects, personality, satisfaction, and network characteristics. In Study 3 (N = 411), we estimated a reliability of [Formula: see text] for scores of three single-item measures of loneliness. Overall, scores of all measures and their nomological nets were highly correlated within and across studies, indicating that the scores of the included measures are all reliable and valid. Recommendations for choosing a loneliness measure are discussed. SAGE Publications 2022-03-04 2023-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10149889/ /pubmed/35246009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10731911221077227 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Articles Mund, Marcus Maes, Marlies Drewke, Pia M. Gutzeit, Antonia Jaki, Isabel Qualter, Pamela Would the Real Loneliness Please Stand Up? The Validity of Loneliness Scores and the Reliability of Single-Item Scores |
title | Would the Real Loneliness Please Stand Up? The Validity of Loneliness Scores and the Reliability of Single-Item Scores |
title_full | Would the Real Loneliness Please Stand Up? The Validity of Loneliness Scores and the Reliability of Single-Item Scores |
title_fullStr | Would the Real Loneliness Please Stand Up? The Validity of Loneliness Scores and the Reliability of Single-Item Scores |
title_full_unstemmed | Would the Real Loneliness Please Stand Up? The Validity of Loneliness Scores and the Reliability of Single-Item Scores |
title_short | Would the Real Loneliness Please Stand Up? The Validity of Loneliness Scores and the Reliability of Single-Item Scores |
title_sort | would the real loneliness please stand up? the validity of loneliness scores and the reliability of single-item scores |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10149889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35246009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10731911221077227 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mundmarcus wouldthereallonelinesspleasestandupthevalidityoflonelinessscoresandthereliabilityofsingleitemscores AT maesmarlies wouldthereallonelinesspleasestandupthevalidityoflonelinessscoresandthereliabilityofsingleitemscores AT drewkepiam wouldthereallonelinesspleasestandupthevalidityoflonelinessscoresandthereliabilityofsingleitemscores AT gutzeitantonia wouldthereallonelinesspleasestandupthevalidityoflonelinessscoresandthereliabilityofsingleitemscores AT jakiisabel wouldthereallonelinesspleasestandupthevalidityoflonelinessscoresandthereliabilityofsingleitemscores AT qualterpamela wouldthereallonelinesspleasestandupthevalidityoflonelinessscoresandthereliabilityofsingleitemscores |