Cargando…

The power of DNA based methods in probiotic authentication

INTRODUCTION: The global probiotic market is growing rapidly, and strict quality control measures are required to ensure probiotic product efficacy and safety. Quality assurance of probiotic products involve confirming the presence of specific probiotic strains, determining the viable cell counts, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shehata, Hanan R., Newmaster, Steven G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10150049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37138639
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1158440
_version_ 1785035281430216704
author Shehata, Hanan R.
Newmaster, Steven G.
author_facet Shehata, Hanan R.
Newmaster, Steven G.
author_sort Shehata, Hanan R.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The global probiotic market is growing rapidly, and strict quality control measures are required to ensure probiotic product efficacy and safety. Quality assurance of probiotic products involve confirming the presence of specific probiotic strains, determining the viable cell counts, and confirming the absence of contaminant strains. Third-party evaluation of probiotic quality and label accuracy is recommended for probiotic manufacturers. Following this recommendation, multiple batches of a top selling multi-strain probiotic product were evaluated for label accuracy. METHODS: A total of 55 samples (five multi-strain finished products and 50 single-strain raw ingredients) containing a total of 100 probiotic strains were evaluated using a combination of molecular methods including targeted PCR, non-targeted amplicon-based High Throughput Sequencing (HTS), and non-targeted Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing (SMS). RESULTS: Targeted testing using species-specific or strain-specific PCR methods confirmed the identity of all strains/species. While 40 strains were identified to strain level, 60 strains were identified to species level only due to lack of strain-specific identification methods. In amplicon based HTS, two variable regions of 16S rRNA gene were targeted. Based on V5–V8 region data, ~99% of total reads per sample corresponded to target species, and no undeclared species were detected. Based on V3–V4 region data, ~95%–97% of total reads per sample corresponded to target species, while ~2%–3% of reads matched undeclared species (Proteus species), however, attempts to culture Proteus confirmed that all batches were free from viable Proteus species. Reads from SMS assembled to the genomes of all 10 target strains in all five batches of the finished product. DISCUSSION: While targeted methods enable quick and accurate identification of target taxa in probiotic products, non-targeted methods enable the identification of all species in a product including undeclared species, with the caveats of complexity, high cost, and long time to result.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10150049
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101500492023-05-02 The power of DNA based methods in probiotic authentication Shehata, Hanan R. Newmaster, Steven G. Front Microbiol Microbiology INTRODUCTION: The global probiotic market is growing rapidly, and strict quality control measures are required to ensure probiotic product efficacy and safety. Quality assurance of probiotic products involve confirming the presence of specific probiotic strains, determining the viable cell counts, and confirming the absence of contaminant strains. Third-party evaluation of probiotic quality and label accuracy is recommended for probiotic manufacturers. Following this recommendation, multiple batches of a top selling multi-strain probiotic product were evaluated for label accuracy. METHODS: A total of 55 samples (five multi-strain finished products and 50 single-strain raw ingredients) containing a total of 100 probiotic strains were evaluated using a combination of molecular methods including targeted PCR, non-targeted amplicon-based High Throughput Sequencing (HTS), and non-targeted Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing (SMS). RESULTS: Targeted testing using species-specific or strain-specific PCR methods confirmed the identity of all strains/species. While 40 strains were identified to strain level, 60 strains were identified to species level only due to lack of strain-specific identification methods. In amplicon based HTS, two variable regions of 16S rRNA gene were targeted. Based on V5–V8 region data, ~99% of total reads per sample corresponded to target species, and no undeclared species were detected. Based on V3–V4 region data, ~95%–97% of total reads per sample corresponded to target species, while ~2%–3% of reads matched undeclared species (Proteus species), however, attempts to culture Proteus confirmed that all batches were free from viable Proteus species. Reads from SMS assembled to the genomes of all 10 target strains in all five batches of the finished product. DISCUSSION: While targeted methods enable quick and accurate identification of target taxa in probiotic products, non-targeted methods enable the identification of all species in a product including undeclared species, with the caveats of complexity, high cost, and long time to result. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10150049/ /pubmed/37138639 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1158440 Text en Copyright © 2023 Shehata and Newmaster. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Shehata, Hanan R.
Newmaster, Steven G.
The power of DNA based methods in probiotic authentication
title The power of DNA based methods in probiotic authentication
title_full The power of DNA based methods in probiotic authentication
title_fullStr The power of DNA based methods in probiotic authentication
title_full_unstemmed The power of DNA based methods in probiotic authentication
title_short The power of DNA based methods in probiotic authentication
title_sort power of dna based methods in probiotic authentication
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10150049/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37138639
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1158440
work_keys_str_mv AT shehatahananr thepowerofdnabasedmethodsinprobioticauthentication
AT newmastersteveng thepowerofdnabasedmethodsinprobioticauthentication
AT shehatahananr powerofdnabasedmethodsinprobioticauthentication
AT newmastersteveng powerofdnabasedmethodsinprobioticauthentication