Cargando…

Validation of an Abridged Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model for the General Population

Accurate breast cancer risk prediction could improve risk-reduction paradigms if thoughtfully used in clinical practice. Identification of at-risk women is the first step in tailoring risk screening and risk-reduction protocols to women's needs. Using the UK Biobank, we validated a simple risk...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spaeth, Erika L., Dite, Gillian S., Hopper, John L., Allman, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Association for Cancer Research 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10150247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36862830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-22-0460
_version_ 1785035329572438016
author Spaeth, Erika L.
Dite, Gillian S.
Hopper, John L.
Allman, Richard
author_facet Spaeth, Erika L.
Dite, Gillian S.
Hopper, John L.
Allman, Richard
author_sort Spaeth, Erika L.
collection PubMed
description Accurate breast cancer risk prediction could improve risk-reduction paradigms if thoughtfully used in clinical practice. Identification of at-risk women is the first step in tailoring risk screening and risk-reduction protocols to women's needs. Using the UK Biobank, we validated a simple risk model to predict breast cancer risk in the general population. Our simple breast cancer risk (BRISK) model integrates a combination of impactful breast cancer-associated risk factors including extended family history and polygenic risk allowing for the removal of moderate factors currently found in comprehensive traditional models. Using two versions of BRISK, differing by 77-single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) versus 313-SNP polygenic risk score integration, we found improved discrimination and risk categorization of both BRISK models compared with one of the most well-known models, the Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (BRCAT). Over a 5-year period, at-risk women classified ≥3% 5-year risk by BRISK had a 1.829 (95% CI = 1.710–1.956) times increased incidence of breast cancer compared with the population, which was higher than the 1.413 (95% CI = 1.217–1.640) times increased incidence for women classified ≥3% by BCRAT. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: In this prospective population-based cohort study, we show the improved performance of a new risk assessment model compared with a gold-standard model (BCRAT). The classification of at-risk women using this new model highlights the opportunity to improve risk stratification and implement existing clinical risk-reduction interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10150247
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Association for Cancer Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101502472023-05-02 Validation of an Abridged Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model for the General Population Spaeth, Erika L. Dite, Gillian S. Hopper, John L. Allman, Richard Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Research Articles Accurate breast cancer risk prediction could improve risk-reduction paradigms if thoughtfully used in clinical practice. Identification of at-risk women is the first step in tailoring risk screening and risk-reduction protocols to women's needs. Using the UK Biobank, we validated a simple risk model to predict breast cancer risk in the general population. Our simple breast cancer risk (BRISK) model integrates a combination of impactful breast cancer-associated risk factors including extended family history and polygenic risk allowing for the removal of moderate factors currently found in comprehensive traditional models. Using two versions of BRISK, differing by 77-single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) versus 313-SNP polygenic risk score integration, we found improved discrimination and risk categorization of both BRISK models compared with one of the most well-known models, the Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (BRCAT). Over a 5-year period, at-risk women classified ≥3% 5-year risk by BRISK had a 1.829 (95% CI = 1.710–1.956) times increased incidence of breast cancer compared with the population, which was higher than the 1.413 (95% CI = 1.217–1.640) times increased incidence for women classified ≥3% by BCRAT. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: In this prospective population-based cohort study, we show the improved performance of a new risk assessment model compared with a gold-standard model (BCRAT). The classification of at-risk women using this new model highlights the opportunity to improve risk stratification and implement existing clinical risk-reduction interventions. American Association for Cancer Research 2023-05-01 2023-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10150247/ /pubmed/36862830 http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-22-0460 Text en ©2023 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open access article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Spaeth, Erika L.
Dite, Gillian S.
Hopper, John L.
Allman, Richard
Validation of an Abridged Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model for the General Population
title Validation of an Abridged Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model for the General Population
title_full Validation of an Abridged Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model for the General Population
title_fullStr Validation of an Abridged Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model for the General Population
title_full_unstemmed Validation of an Abridged Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model for the General Population
title_short Validation of an Abridged Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model for the General Population
title_sort validation of an abridged breast cancer risk prediction model for the general population
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10150247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36862830
http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-22-0460
work_keys_str_mv AT spaetherikal validationofanabridgedbreastcancerriskpredictionmodelforthegeneralpopulation
AT ditegillians validationofanabridgedbreastcancerriskpredictionmodelforthegeneralpopulation
AT hopperjohnl validationofanabridgedbreastcancerriskpredictionmodelforthegeneralpopulation
AT allmanrichard validationofanabridgedbreastcancerriskpredictionmodelforthegeneralpopulation