Cargando…
Civic Engagement in Neighbourhoods regarding serious illness, death and loss (CEIN): a study protocol for a convergent-parallel mixed-methods process and outcome evaluation that balances control and flexibility
BACKGROUND: New public health approaches in palliative care attribute an active role to civic society in providing care for those who are seriously ill, caring, or bereaved. Accordingly, Civic Engagement In Neighbourhoods regarding serious illness, dying and loss (CEIN) are emerging worldwide. Howev...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10150425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37138931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26323524231168417 |
_version_ | 1785035357681614848 |
---|---|
author | D’Eer, Louise Chambaere, Kenneth Van den Block, Lieve Dury, Sarah Deliens, Luc Cohen, Joachim Smets, Tinne |
author_facet | D’Eer, Louise Chambaere, Kenneth Van den Block, Lieve Dury, Sarah Deliens, Luc Cohen, Joachim Smets, Tinne |
author_sort | D’Eer, Louise |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: New public health approaches in palliative care attribute an active role to civic society in providing care for those who are seriously ill, caring, or bereaved. Accordingly, Civic Engagement In Neighbourhoods regarding serious illness, dying and loss (CEIN) are emerging worldwide. However, study protocols that advise on how to evaluate the impact and complex social change processes underlying these civic engagement initiatives are lacking. OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this study is to describe the study protocol for the evaluation of civic engagement initiatives in serious illness, dying, and loss in two neighbourhoods in Flanders, Belgium. DESIGN: A convergent-parallel mixed-method process and outcome evaluation for the CEIN study. METHODS & ANALYSIS: We look at the evaluation of CEIN through a critical realist lens, thereby including the social, political, and economic determinants of social change in CEIN, the mechanisms to achieve this social change, the outcomes, and the mutual connection between these three aspects. We will conduct a convergent-parallel mixed-method process and outcome evaluation in which qualitative (i.e. observations, interviews, group discussions, and ego network mapping) and quantitative data (i.e. a pre–post survey) are simultaneously but separately collected and analysed and in the last stage combined by narrative synthesis. DISCUSSION: This protocol illustrates the difficulty of operationalising the desired long-term impact of social changes regarding serious illness, dying, and loss into more manageable outcomes. We recommend a well-cogitated logic model that connects the outcomes of the study to its potential actions. Applying this protocol in practice is a constant exercise between providing sufficient flexibility to meet feasibility, desirability, and context-specific needs in the CEIN study and providing sufficient guidelines to structure and control the evaluation process. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10150425 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101504252023-05-02 Civic Engagement in Neighbourhoods regarding serious illness, death and loss (CEIN): a study protocol for a convergent-parallel mixed-methods process and outcome evaluation that balances control and flexibility D’Eer, Louise Chambaere, Kenneth Van den Block, Lieve Dury, Sarah Deliens, Luc Cohen, Joachim Smets, Tinne Palliat Care Soc Pract Study Protocol BACKGROUND: New public health approaches in palliative care attribute an active role to civic society in providing care for those who are seriously ill, caring, or bereaved. Accordingly, Civic Engagement In Neighbourhoods regarding serious illness, dying and loss (CEIN) are emerging worldwide. However, study protocols that advise on how to evaluate the impact and complex social change processes underlying these civic engagement initiatives are lacking. OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this study is to describe the study protocol for the evaluation of civic engagement initiatives in serious illness, dying, and loss in two neighbourhoods in Flanders, Belgium. DESIGN: A convergent-parallel mixed-method process and outcome evaluation for the CEIN study. METHODS & ANALYSIS: We look at the evaluation of CEIN through a critical realist lens, thereby including the social, political, and economic determinants of social change in CEIN, the mechanisms to achieve this social change, the outcomes, and the mutual connection between these three aspects. We will conduct a convergent-parallel mixed-method process and outcome evaluation in which qualitative (i.e. observations, interviews, group discussions, and ego network mapping) and quantitative data (i.e. a pre–post survey) are simultaneously but separately collected and analysed and in the last stage combined by narrative synthesis. DISCUSSION: This protocol illustrates the difficulty of operationalising the desired long-term impact of social changes regarding serious illness, dying, and loss into more manageable outcomes. We recommend a well-cogitated logic model that connects the outcomes of the study to its potential actions. Applying this protocol in practice is a constant exercise between providing sufficient flexibility to meet feasibility, desirability, and context-specific needs in the CEIN study and providing sufficient guidelines to structure and control the evaluation process. SAGE Publications 2023-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10150425/ /pubmed/37138931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26323524231168417 Text en © The Author(s), 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol D’Eer, Louise Chambaere, Kenneth Van den Block, Lieve Dury, Sarah Deliens, Luc Cohen, Joachim Smets, Tinne Civic Engagement in Neighbourhoods regarding serious illness, death and loss (CEIN): a study protocol for a convergent-parallel mixed-methods process and outcome evaluation that balances control and flexibility |
title | Civic Engagement in Neighbourhoods regarding serious illness, death
and loss (CEIN): a study protocol for a convergent-parallel mixed-methods
process and outcome evaluation that balances control and
flexibility |
title_full | Civic Engagement in Neighbourhoods regarding serious illness, death
and loss (CEIN): a study protocol for a convergent-parallel mixed-methods
process and outcome evaluation that balances control and
flexibility |
title_fullStr | Civic Engagement in Neighbourhoods regarding serious illness, death
and loss (CEIN): a study protocol for a convergent-parallel mixed-methods
process and outcome evaluation that balances control and
flexibility |
title_full_unstemmed | Civic Engagement in Neighbourhoods regarding serious illness, death
and loss (CEIN): a study protocol for a convergent-parallel mixed-methods
process and outcome evaluation that balances control and
flexibility |
title_short | Civic Engagement in Neighbourhoods regarding serious illness, death
and loss (CEIN): a study protocol for a convergent-parallel mixed-methods
process and outcome evaluation that balances control and
flexibility |
title_sort | civic engagement in neighbourhoods regarding serious illness, death
and loss (cein): a study protocol for a convergent-parallel mixed-methods
process and outcome evaluation that balances control and
flexibility |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10150425/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37138931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26323524231168417 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deerlouise civicengagementinneighbourhoodsregardingseriousillnessdeathandlossceinastudyprotocolforaconvergentparallelmixedmethodsprocessandoutcomeevaluationthatbalancescontrolandflexibility AT chambaerekenneth civicengagementinneighbourhoodsregardingseriousillnessdeathandlossceinastudyprotocolforaconvergentparallelmixedmethodsprocessandoutcomeevaluationthatbalancescontrolandflexibility AT vandenblocklieve civicengagementinneighbourhoodsregardingseriousillnessdeathandlossceinastudyprotocolforaconvergentparallelmixedmethodsprocessandoutcomeevaluationthatbalancescontrolandflexibility AT durysarah civicengagementinneighbourhoodsregardingseriousillnessdeathandlossceinastudyprotocolforaconvergentparallelmixedmethodsprocessandoutcomeevaluationthatbalancescontrolandflexibility AT deliensluc civicengagementinneighbourhoodsregardingseriousillnessdeathandlossceinastudyprotocolforaconvergentparallelmixedmethodsprocessandoutcomeevaluationthatbalancescontrolandflexibility AT cohenjoachim civicengagementinneighbourhoodsregardingseriousillnessdeathandlossceinastudyprotocolforaconvergentparallelmixedmethodsprocessandoutcomeevaluationthatbalancescontrolandflexibility AT smetstinne civicengagementinneighbourhoodsregardingseriousillnessdeathandlossceinastudyprotocolforaconvergentparallelmixedmethodsprocessandoutcomeevaluationthatbalancescontrolandflexibility |