Cargando…

Civic Engagement in Neighbourhoods regarding serious illness, death and loss (CEIN): a study protocol for a convergent-parallel mixed-methods process and outcome evaluation that balances control and flexibility

BACKGROUND: New public health approaches in palliative care attribute an active role to civic society in providing care for those who are seriously ill, caring, or bereaved. Accordingly, Civic Engagement In Neighbourhoods regarding serious illness, dying and loss (CEIN) are emerging worldwide. Howev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: D’Eer, Louise, Chambaere, Kenneth, Van den Block, Lieve, Dury, Sarah, Deliens, Luc, Cohen, Joachim, Smets, Tinne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10150425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37138931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26323524231168417
_version_ 1785035357681614848
author D’Eer, Louise
Chambaere, Kenneth
Van den Block, Lieve
Dury, Sarah
Deliens, Luc
Cohen, Joachim
Smets, Tinne
author_facet D’Eer, Louise
Chambaere, Kenneth
Van den Block, Lieve
Dury, Sarah
Deliens, Luc
Cohen, Joachim
Smets, Tinne
author_sort D’Eer, Louise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: New public health approaches in palliative care attribute an active role to civic society in providing care for those who are seriously ill, caring, or bereaved. Accordingly, Civic Engagement In Neighbourhoods regarding serious illness, dying and loss (CEIN) are emerging worldwide. However, study protocols that advise on how to evaluate the impact and complex social change processes underlying these civic engagement initiatives are lacking. OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this study is to describe the study protocol for the evaluation of civic engagement initiatives in serious illness, dying, and loss in two neighbourhoods in Flanders, Belgium. DESIGN: A convergent-parallel mixed-method process and outcome evaluation for the CEIN study. METHODS & ANALYSIS: We look at the evaluation of CEIN through a critical realist lens, thereby including the social, political, and economic determinants of social change in CEIN, the mechanisms to achieve this social change, the outcomes, and the mutual connection between these three aspects. We will conduct a convergent-parallel mixed-method process and outcome evaluation in which qualitative (i.e. observations, interviews, group discussions, and ego network mapping) and quantitative data (i.e. a pre–post survey) are simultaneously but separately collected and analysed and in the last stage combined by narrative synthesis. DISCUSSION: This protocol illustrates the difficulty of operationalising the desired long-term impact of social changes regarding serious illness, dying, and loss into more manageable outcomes. We recommend a well-cogitated logic model that connects the outcomes of the study to its potential actions. Applying this protocol in practice is a constant exercise between providing sufficient flexibility to meet feasibility, desirability, and context-specific needs in the CEIN study and providing sufficient guidelines to structure and control the evaluation process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10150425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101504252023-05-02 Civic Engagement in Neighbourhoods regarding serious illness, death and loss (CEIN): a study protocol for a convergent-parallel mixed-methods process and outcome evaluation that balances control and flexibility D’Eer, Louise Chambaere, Kenneth Van den Block, Lieve Dury, Sarah Deliens, Luc Cohen, Joachim Smets, Tinne Palliat Care Soc Pract Study Protocol BACKGROUND: New public health approaches in palliative care attribute an active role to civic society in providing care for those who are seriously ill, caring, or bereaved. Accordingly, Civic Engagement In Neighbourhoods regarding serious illness, dying and loss (CEIN) are emerging worldwide. However, study protocols that advise on how to evaluate the impact and complex social change processes underlying these civic engagement initiatives are lacking. OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this study is to describe the study protocol for the evaluation of civic engagement initiatives in serious illness, dying, and loss in two neighbourhoods in Flanders, Belgium. DESIGN: A convergent-parallel mixed-method process and outcome evaluation for the CEIN study. METHODS & ANALYSIS: We look at the evaluation of CEIN through a critical realist lens, thereby including the social, political, and economic determinants of social change in CEIN, the mechanisms to achieve this social change, the outcomes, and the mutual connection between these three aspects. We will conduct a convergent-parallel mixed-method process and outcome evaluation in which qualitative (i.e. observations, interviews, group discussions, and ego network mapping) and quantitative data (i.e. a pre–post survey) are simultaneously but separately collected and analysed and in the last stage combined by narrative synthesis. DISCUSSION: This protocol illustrates the difficulty of operationalising the desired long-term impact of social changes regarding serious illness, dying, and loss into more manageable outcomes. We recommend a well-cogitated logic model that connects the outcomes of the study to its potential actions. Applying this protocol in practice is a constant exercise between providing sufficient flexibility to meet feasibility, desirability, and context-specific needs in the CEIN study and providing sufficient guidelines to structure and control the evaluation process. SAGE Publications 2023-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC10150425/ /pubmed/37138931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26323524231168417 Text en © The Author(s), 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Study Protocol
D’Eer, Louise
Chambaere, Kenneth
Van den Block, Lieve
Dury, Sarah
Deliens, Luc
Cohen, Joachim
Smets, Tinne
Civic Engagement in Neighbourhoods regarding serious illness, death and loss (CEIN): a study protocol for a convergent-parallel mixed-methods process and outcome evaluation that balances control and flexibility
title Civic Engagement in Neighbourhoods regarding serious illness, death and loss (CEIN): a study protocol for a convergent-parallel mixed-methods process and outcome evaluation that balances control and flexibility
title_full Civic Engagement in Neighbourhoods regarding serious illness, death and loss (CEIN): a study protocol for a convergent-parallel mixed-methods process and outcome evaluation that balances control and flexibility
title_fullStr Civic Engagement in Neighbourhoods regarding serious illness, death and loss (CEIN): a study protocol for a convergent-parallel mixed-methods process and outcome evaluation that balances control and flexibility
title_full_unstemmed Civic Engagement in Neighbourhoods regarding serious illness, death and loss (CEIN): a study protocol for a convergent-parallel mixed-methods process and outcome evaluation that balances control and flexibility
title_short Civic Engagement in Neighbourhoods regarding serious illness, death and loss (CEIN): a study protocol for a convergent-parallel mixed-methods process and outcome evaluation that balances control and flexibility
title_sort civic engagement in neighbourhoods regarding serious illness, death and loss (cein): a study protocol for a convergent-parallel mixed-methods process and outcome evaluation that balances control and flexibility
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10150425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37138931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/26323524231168417
work_keys_str_mv AT deerlouise civicengagementinneighbourhoodsregardingseriousillnessdeathandlossceinastudyprotocolforaconvergentparallelmixedmethodsprocessandoutcomeevaluationthatbalancescontrolandflexibility
AT chambaerekenneth civicengagementinneighbourhoodsregardingseriousillnessdeathandlossceinastudyprotocolforaconvergentparallelmixedmethodsprocessandoutcomeevaluationthatbalancescontrolandflexibility
AT vandenblocklieve civicengagementinneighbourhoodsregardingseriousillnessdeathandlossceinastudyprotocolforaconvergentparallelmixedmethodsprocessandoutcomeevaluationthatbalancescontrolandflexibility
AT durysarah civicengagementinneighbourhoodsregardingseriousillnessdeathandlossceinastudyprotocolforaconvergentparallelmixedmethodsprocessandoutcomeevaluationthatbalancescontrolandflexibility
AT deliensluc civicengagementinneighbourhoodsregardingseriousillnessdeathandlossceinastudyprotocolforaconvergentparallelmixedmethodsprocessandoutcomeevaluationthatbalancescontrolandflexibility
AT cohenjoachim civicengagementinneighbourhoodsregardingseriousillnessdeathandlossceinastudyprotocolforaconvergentparallelmixedmethodsprocessandoutcomeevaluationthatbalancescontrolandflexibility
AT smetstinne civicengagementinneighbourhoodsregardingseriousillnessdeathandlossceinastudyprotocolforaconvergentparallelmixedmethodsprocessandoutcomeevaluationthatbalancescontrolandflexibility