Cargando…

Educational Relative Value Units as a Measure of Academic Productivity: A Systematic Review

Introduction: Academic Health Centers (AHCs) have complex, often competing missions. Many have developed mission-based management (MBM) systems to support their clinical and non-clinical missions. There are limited data on MBM use for their educational missions. Our scoping review explored how AHCs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beck Dallaghan, Gary L, Wright, Sarah T, Plant, Jennifer, Butani, Lavjay, Morgenstern, Bruce Z
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10150577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37139040
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36995
_version_ 1785035383525867520
author Beck Dallaghan, Gary L
Wright, Sarah T
Plant, Jennifer
Butani, Lavjay
Morgenstern, Bruce Z
author_facet Beck Dallaghan, Gary L
Wright, Sarah T
Plant, Jennifer
Butani, Lavjay
Morgenstern, Bruce Z
author_sort Beck Dallaghan, Gary L
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Academic Health Centers (AHCs) have complex, often competing missions. Many have developed mission-based management (MBM) systems to support their clinical and non-clinical missions. There are limited data on MBM use for their educational missions. Our scoping review explored how AHCs employed such systems.  Materials and methods: Arksey and O’Malley’s six-stage framework guided our review. Based on pre-defined criteria, English language articles from PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and the Healthcare Administration Database published between 2010 and 2020 were loaded into a reference manager. The search included all health professions education schools. Articles were excluded if they were review articles, commentaries, or clearly did not involve funding for education. From the final list of selected articles, data were extracted using a data extraction sheet we developed. Two researchers reviewed each article again to ensure extracted data were reported consistently and with sufficient detail.  Results: Of the 1729 manuscripts identified, 35 met inclusion criteria. Sixteen (46%) contained data in some form but did not have a formal methods section describing the specific approach to data collection and analysis. Moreover, there was marked variability in how educational effort was quantified, what counted as educational effort (educational scholarship versus teaching) and the impacts of such quantification (departmental funding versus individual faculty incentives). None of the studies reported on the impact on faculty promotion. Faculty satisfaction with the system was reported in seven studies (20%) and was generally positive. Conclusions: A systematic description of how systems were developed to support the educational mission was lacking. Clear goals, methods of development, uniform data on educational productivity and quality, and program evaluation were not defined by most articles. This lack of process clarity presents a challenge, but more importantly an opportunity for academic health centers to unify efforts and continue to further their educational mission.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10150577
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101505772023-05-02 Educational Relative Value Units as a Measure of Academic Productivity: A Systematic Review Beck Dallaghan, Gary L Wright, Sarah T Plant, Jennifer Butani, Lavjay Morgenstern, Bruce Z Cureus Medical Education Introduction: Academic Health Centers (AHCs) have complex, often competing missions. Many have developed mission-based management (MBM) systems to support their clinical and non-clinical missions. There are limited data on MBM use for their educational missions. Our scoping review explored how AHCs employed such systems.  Materials and methods: Arksey and O’Malley’s six-stage framework guided our review. Based on pre-defined criteria, English language articles from PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and the Healthcare Administration Database published between 2010 and 2020 were loaded into a reference manager. The search included all health professions education schools. Articles were excluded if they were review articles, commentaries, or clearly did not involve funding for education. From the final list of selected articles, data were extracted using a data extraction sheet we developed. Two researchers reviewed each article again to ensure extracted data were reported consistently and with sufficient detail.  Results: Of the 1729 manuscripts identified, 35 met inclusion criteria. Sixteen (46%) contained data in some form but did not have a formal methods section describing the specific approach to data collection and analysis. Moreover, there was marked variability in how educational effort was quantified, what counted as educational effort (educational scholarship versus teaching) and the impacts of such quantification (departmental funding versus individual faculty incentives). None of the studies reported on the impact on faculty promotion. Faculty satisfaction with the system was reported in seven studies (20%) and was generally positive. Conclusions: A systematic description of how systems were developed to support the educational mission was lacking. Clear goals, methods of development, uniform data on educational productivity and quality, and program evaluation were not defined by most articles. This lack of process clarity presents a challenge, but more importantly an opportunity for academic health centers to unify efforts and continue to further their educational mission. Cureus 2023-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10150577/ /pubmed/37139040 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36995 Text en Copyright © 2023, Beck Dallaghan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Medical Education
Beck Dallaghan, Gary L
Wright, Sarah T
Plant, Jennifer
Butani, Lavjay
Morgenstern, Bruce Z
Educational Relative Value Units as a Measure of Academic Productivity: A Systematic Review
title Educational Relative Value Units as a Measure of Academic Productivity: A Systematic Review
title_full Educational Relative Value Units as a Measure of Academic Productivity: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Educational Relative Value Units as a Measure of Academic Productivity: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Educational Relative Value Units as a Measure of Academic Productivity: A Systematic Review
title_short Educational Relative Value Units as a Measure of Academic Productivity: A Systematic Review
title_sort educational relative value units as a measure of academic productivity: a systematic review
topic Medical Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10150577/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37139040
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.36995
work_keys_str_mv AT beckdallaghangaryl educationalrelativevalueunitsasameasureofacademicproductivityasystematicreview
AT wrightsaraht educationalrelativevalueunitsasameasureofacademicproductivityasystematicreview
AT plantjennifer educationalrelativevalueunitsasameasureofacademicproductivityasystematicreview
AT butanilavjay educationalrelativevalueunitsasameasureofacademicproductivityasystematicreview
AT morgensternbrucez educationalrelativevalueunitsasameasureofacademicproductivityasystematicreview