Cargando…

Contemporary flowable bulk-fill resin-based composites: a systematic review

Flowable bulk-fill resin-based composites (BF-RBCs) represent a new and interesting alternative for the bulk-fill restorative techniques in the posterior region. However, they comprise a heterogeneous group of materials, with important differences in composition and design. Therefore, the aim of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parra Gatica, Elizabeth, Duran Ojeda, Gerardo, Wendler, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10150621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37138762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2023.2175685
_version_ 1785035387778891776
author Parra Gatica, Elizabeth
Duran Ojeda, Gerardo
Wendler, Michael
author_facet Parra Gatica, Elizabeth
Duran Ojeda, Gerardo
Wendler, Michael
author_sort Parra Gatica, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description Flowable bulk-fill resin-based composites (BF-RBCs) represent a new and interesting alternative for the bulk-fill restorative techniques in the posterior region. However, they comprise a heterogeneous group of materials, with important differences in composition and design. Therefore, the aim of the present systematic review was to compare the main properties of flowable BF-RBCs, including their composition, degree of monomer conversion (DC), polymerization shrinkage and shrinkage stress, as well as flexural strength. The search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines in the Medline (PubMed), Scopus and Web of Science databases. In vitro articles reporting on the DC, polymerization shrinkage/shrinkage stress, and flexural strength of flowable BF-RBCs strength were included. The QUIN risk-of-bias (RoB) tool was used for assessing the study quality. From initially 684 found articles, 53 were included. Values for DC ranged between 19.41 and 93.71%, whereas polymerization shrinkage varied between 1.26 and 10.45%. Polymerization shrinkage stresses reported by most studies ranged between 2 and 3 MPa. Flexural strength was above 80 MPa for most materials. A moderate RoB was observed in most studies. Flowable BF-RBCs meet the requirements to be indicated for bulk fill restoration technique in the posterior region. However, important variations among composition and properties hinder extrapolation of the results to materials different from those reported here. Clinical studies are urgently required to assess their performance under a real working scenario.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10150621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101506212023-05-02 Contemporary flowable bulk-fill resin-based composites: a systematic review Parra Gatica, Elizabeth Duran Ojeda, Gerardo Wendler, Michael Biomater Investig Dent Research Article Flowable bulk-fill resin-based composites (BF-RBCs) represent a new and interesting alternative for the bulk-fill restorative techniques in the posterior region. However, they comprise a heterogeneous group of materials, with important differences in composition and design. Therefore, the aim of the present systematic review was to compare the main properties of flowable BF-RBCs, including their composition, degree of monomer conversion (DC), polymerization shrinkage and shrinkage stress, as well as flexural strength. The search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines in the Medline (PubMed), Scopus and Web of Science databases. In vitro articles reporting on the DC, polymerization shrinkage/shrinkage stress, and flexural strength of flowable BF-RBCs strength were included. The QUIN risk-of-bias (RoB) tool was used for assessing the study quality. From initially 684 found articles, 53 were included. Values for DC ranged between 19.41 and 93.71%, whereas polymerization shrinkage varied between 1.26 and 10.45%. Polymerization shrinkage stresses reported by most studies ranged between 2 and 3 MPa. Flexural strength was above 80 MPa for most materials. A moderate RoB was observed in most studies. Flowable BF-RBCs meet the requirements to be indicated for bulk fill restoration technique in the posterior region. However, important variations among composition and properties hinder extrapolation of the results to materials different from those reported here. Clinical studies are urgently required to assess their performance under a real working scenario. Taylor & Francis 2023-02-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10150621/ /pubmed/37138762 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2023.2175685 Text en © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
spellingShingle Research Article
Parra Gatica, Elizabeth
Duran Ojeda, Gerardo
Wendler, Michael
Contemporary flowable bulk-fill resin-based composites: a systematic review
title Contemporary flowable bulk-fill resin-based composites: a systematic review
title_full Contemporary flowable bulk-fill resin-based composites: a systematic review
title_fullStr Contemporary flowable bulk-fill resin-based composites: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Contemporary flowable bulk-fill resin-based composites: a systematic review
title_short Contemporary flowable bulk-fill resin-based composites: a systematic review
title_sort contemporary flowable bulk-fill resin-based composites: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10150621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37138762
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2023.2175685
work_keys_str_mv AT parragaticaelizabeth contemporaryflowablebulkfillresinbasedcompositesasystematicreview
AT duranojedagerardo contemporaryflowablebulkfillresinbasedcompositesasystematicreview
AT wendlermichael contemporaryflowablebulkfillresinbasedcompositesasystematicreview