Cargando…
Guidance for management competency identification and development in the health context: a systematic scoping review
BACKGROUND: Using management competency-based frameworks to guide developing and delivering training and formal education to managers has been increasingly recognized as a key strategy in building management capacity. Hence, interest in identifying and confirming the competency requirements in vario...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10150671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37127614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09404-9 |
_version_ | 1785035396997971968 |
---|---|
author | Kakemam, Edris Liang, Zhanming |
author_facet | Kakemam, Edris Liang, Zhanming |
author_sort | Kakemam, Edris |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Using management competency-based frameworks to guide developing and delivering training and formal education to managers has been increasingly recognized as a key strategy in building management capacity. Hence, interest in identifying and confirming the competency requirements in various contexts have been witnessed. Therefore, learnings from how competency studies were designed and conducted, how competencies were identified, and strategies in ensuring success in competency identification are of great value to researchers planning and conducting competency studies in their own country. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted guided by the Arksey and O’Malley framework and reported according to the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). All papers that published empirical studies aiming at identifying and assessing manager’s competencies at the peer-reviewed journals were identified from Web of sciences, PubMed, Scopus and Emerald Management between 2000 and 2021. In order to maximize learning, studies focusing on health and non-health sectors are all included. RESULTS: In total, 186 studies were included in the review including slightly more than half of the studies conducted in health sector (54.5%). 60% of the studies focused on mid to senior level managers. Surveys and Interviews were the two most commonly used methods either solely or as part of the mix-method in the studies. Half of the studies used mixed methods approach (51.1%). Large proportion of the papers failed to include all information that is necessary to contribute to learning and improvement in future study design. Based on the results of the scoping review a four steps framework was developed that can guide designing and implementing management competency studies in specific country vs. sector context and to ensure benefits of the studies are maximised. CONCLUSION: The review confirmed the increasing trend in investing in management competency studies and that the management competency identification and development process varied substantially, in the choice of methods and processes. The identification of missing information in majority of the published studies calls for the development of more rigorous guidelines for the peer-review process of journal publications. The proposed framework of improving the quality and impact of the future management competency study provides clear guidance to management competency identification and development that promotes the functional alignment of methods and strategies with intended uses and contexts. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09404-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10150671 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101506712023-05-02 Guidance for management competency identification and development in the health context: a systematic scoping review Kakemam, Edris Liang, Zhanming BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Using management competency-based frameworks to guide developing and delivering training and formal education to managers has been increasingly recognized as a key strategy in building management capacity. Hence, interest in identifying and confirming the competency requirements in various contexts have been witnessed. Therefore, learnings from how competency studies were designed and conducted, how competencies were identified, and strategies in ensuring success in competency identification are of great value to researchers planning and conducting competency studies in their own country. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted guided by the Arksey and O’Malley framework and reported according to the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). All papers that published empirical studies aiming at identifying and assessing manager’s competencies at the peer-reviewed journals were identified from Web of sciences, PubMed, Scopus and Emerald Management between 2000 and 2021. In order to maximize learning, studies focusing on health and non-health sectors are all included. RESULTS: In total, 186 studies were included in the review including slightly more than half of the studies conducted in health sector (54.5%). 60% of the studies focused on mid to senior level managers. Surveys and Interviews were the two most commonly used methods either solely or as part of the mix-method in the studies. Half of the studies used mixed methods approach (51.1%). Large proportion of the papers failed to include all information that is necessary to contribute to learning and improvement in future study design. Based on the results of the scoping review a four steps framework was developed that can guide designing and implementing management competency studies in specific country vs. sector context and to ensure benefits of the studies are maximised. CONCLUSION: The review confirmed the increasing trend in investing in management competency studies and that the management competency identification and development process varied substantially, in the choice of methods and processes. The identification of missing information in majority of the published studies calls for the development of more rigorous guidelines for the peer-review process of journal publications. The proposed framework of improving the quality and impact of the future management competency study provides clear guidance to management competency identification and development that promotes the functional alignment of methods and strategies with intended uses and contexts. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-023-09404-9. BioMed Central 2023-05-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10150671/ /pubmed/37127614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09404-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Kakemam, Edris Liang, Zhanming Guidance for management competency identification and development in the health context: a systematic scoping review |
title | Guidance for management competency identification and development in the health context: a systematic scoping review |
title_full | Guidance for management competency identification and development in the health context: a systematic scoping review |
title_fullStr | Guidance for management competency identification and development in the health context: a systematic scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Guidance for management competency identification and development in the health context: a systematic scoping review |
title_short | Guidance for management competency identification and development in the health context: a systematic scoping review |
title_sort | guidance for management competency identification and development in the health context: a systematic scoping review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10150671/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37127614 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09404-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kakemamedris guidanceformanagementcompetencyidentificationanddevelopmentinthehealthcontextasystematicscopingreview AT liangzhanming guidanceformanagementcompetencyidentificationanddevelopmentinthehealthcontextasystematicscopingreview |