Healing of Endosseous Implants Having Different Surface Characteristics in the Alveolar Bone: A Clinical Study

Background Total treatment time in implant placement can be significantly reduced by placing immediate implants into the freshly extracted sockets. Also, immediate implant placement can act as a guide for proper and accurate implant placement. Additionally, in immediate implant placement, the resorption of bone associated with the healing of the extraction socket is also reduced. This clinical study aimed to clinically and radiographically assess the healing of endosseous implants having different surface characteristics in nongrafted and grafted bone. Methodology In 68 subjects, 198 implants were placed, including 102 oxidized (TiUnite, Göteborg, Sweden) and 96 turned surface implants (Nobel Biocare Mark III, Göteborg) were placed. Survival was considered with clinical stability and acceptable function with no discomfort and no radiographic or clinical signs of pathology/infection. Rest cases that showed no healing and implant no osseointegration were considered failures. Clinical and radiographic examination was done by two experts after two years of loading based on bleeding on probing (BOP) mesially and distally, radiographic marginal bone levels, and probing depth (mesial and distal). Results Five implants failed in total where four implants were with the turned surface (Nobel Biocare Mark III) and one was from the oxidized surface (TiUnite). The one oxidized implant was in a 62-year-old female and was placed in the region of mandibular premolar (44) of length 13 mm and was lost within five months of placement before functional loading. Mean probing depth had a nonsignificant difference between oxidized and turned surfaces with the mean values of 1.6 ± 1.2 and 1.5 ± 1.0 mm, respectively, with P = 0.5984; mean BOP in oxidized and turned surfaces was 0.3 ± 0.7 and 0.4 ± 0.6, respectively (P = 0.3727). Marginal bone levels, respectively, were 2.0 ± 0.8 and 1.8 ± 0.7 mm (P = 0.1231). In marginal bone levels related to implant loading, a nonsignificant difference was seen in early loading and one-stage loading with P-values of 0.06 and 0.09, respectively. However, in two-stage placement, significantly higher values were seen for oxidized surfaces (2.4 ± 0.8 mm) compared to turned surfaces (1.9 ± 0.8 mm), with P = 0.0004. Conclusions This study concludes that nonsignificantly higher survival rates are associated with oxidized surfaces compared to turned surfaces after two years of follow-up. Higher marginal bone levels were seen in oxidized surfaces for single implants and implants placed in two stages.