Cargando…

Implementing SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing scale-up in Rwanda: retrospective analysis of national programme data and qualitative findings

OBJECTIVES: Reverse transcriptase PCR is the most sensitive test for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. However, the scale-up of these tests in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) has been limited due to infrastructure and cost. Antigen rapid diagnostic tests are an alternative option for diagnosing a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rutayisire, Robert, Boeke, Caroline E, Joseph, Jessica, Bansal, Namita, Bigirimana, Noella, Demke, Owen, Kallarakal, Ashley, Karame, Prosper, Ndayishimiye, Rodrigue, Umumararungu, Esperance, Peter, Trevor, Khan, Shaukat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10151244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37185639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066776
_version_ 1785035498976182272
author Rutayisire, Robert
Boeke, Caroline E
Joseph, Jessica
Bansal, Namita
Bigirimana, Noella
Demke, Owen
Kallarakal, Ashley
Karame, Prosper
Ndayishimiye, Rodrigue
Umumararungu, Esperance
Peter, Trevor
Khan, Shaukat
author_facet Rutayisire, Robert
Boeke, Caroline E
Joseph, Jessica
Bansal, Namita
Bigirimana, Noella
Demke, Owen
Kallarakal, Ashley
Karame, Prosper
Ndayishimiye, Rodrigue
Umumararungu, Esperance
Peter, Trevor
Khan, Shaukat
author_sort Rutayisire, Robert
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Reverse transcriptase PCR is the most sensitive test for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. However, the scale-up of these tests in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) has been limited due to infrastructure and cost. Antigen rapid diagnostic tests are an alternative option for diagnosing active infection that may allow for faster, easier, less expensive and more widespread testing. We compared the implementation of antigen and PCR testing programmes in Rwanda. DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed routinely collected PCR and antigen testing data for all reported tests conducted nationally. We administered semiquantitative surveys to healthcare workers (HCWs) involved in COVID-19 testing and care and clients receiving antigen testing. SETTING: Rwanda, November 2020–July 2021. PARTICIPANTS: National SARS-CoV-2 testing data; 49 HCWs involved in COVID-19 testing and care; 145 clients receiving antigen testing. INTERVENTIONS: None (retrospective analysis of programme data). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Test volumes, turnaround times, feasibility and acceptability of antigen testing. RESULTS: Data from 906 204 antigen tests and 445 235 PCR tests were included. Antigen testing increased test availability and case identification compared with PCR and had a median results return time of 0 days (IQR: 0–0). In contrast, PCR testing time ranged from 1 to 18 days depending on the sample collection site/district. Both HCWs and clients indicated that antigen testing was feasible and acceptable. Some HCWs identified stockouts and limited healthcare staff as challenges. CONCLUSIONS: Antigen testing facilitated rapid expansion and decentralisation of SARS-CoV-2 testing across lower tier facilities in Rwanda, contributed to increased case identification, reduced test processing times, and was determined to be feasible and acceptable to clients and providers. Antigen testing will be an essential component of SARS-CoV-2 test and treat programmes in LMICs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10151244
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101512442023-05-02 Implementing SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing scale-up in Rwanda: retrospective analysis of national programme data and qualitative findings Rutayisire, Robert Boeke, Caroline E Joseph, Jessica Bansal, Namita Bigirimana, Noella Demke, Owen Kallarakal, Ashley Karame, Prosper Ndayishimiye, Rodrigue Umumararungu, Esperance Peter, Trevor Khan, Shaukat BMJ Open Global Health OBJECTIVES: Reverse transcriptase PCR is the most sensitive test for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. However, the scale-up of these tests in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) has been limited due to infrastructure and cost. Antigen rapid diagnostic tests are an alternative option for diagnosing active infection that may allow for faster, easier, less expensive and more widespread testing. We compared the implementation of antigen and PCR testing programmes in Rwanda. DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed routinely collected PCR and antigen testing data for all reported tests conducted nationally. We administered semiquantitative surveys to healthcare workers (HCWs) involved in COVID-19 testing and care and clients receiving antigen testing. SETTING: Rwanda, November 2020–July 2021. PARTICIPANTS: National SARS-CoV-2 testing data; 49 HCWs involved in COVID-19 testing and care; 145 clients receiving antigen testing. INTERVENTIONS: None (retrospective analysis of programme data). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Test volumes, turnaround times, feasibility and acceptability of antigen testing. RESULTS: Data from 906 204 antigen tests and 445 235 PCR tests were included. Antigen testing increased test availability and case identification compared with PCR and had a median results return time of 0 days (IQR: 0–0). In contrast, PCR testing time ranged from 1 to 18 days depending on the sample collection site/district. Both HCWs and clients indicated that antigen testing was feasible and acceptable. Some HCWs identified stockouts and limited healthcare staff as challenges. CONCLUSIONS: Antigen testing facilitated rapid expansion and decentralisation of SARS-CoV-2 testing across lower tier facilities in Rwanda, contributed to increased case identification, reduced test processing times, and was determined to be feasible and acceptable to clients and providers. Antigen testing will be an essential component of SARS-CoV-2 test and treat programmes in LMICs. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10151244/ /pubmed/37185639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066776 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Global Health
Rutayisire, Robert
Boeke, Caroline E
Joseph, Jessica
Bansal, Namita
Bigirimana, Noella
Demke, Owen
Kallarakal, Ashley
Karame, Prosper
Ndayishimiye, Rodrigue
Umumararungu, Esperance
Peter, Trevor
Khan, Shaukat
Implementing SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing scale-up in Rwanda: retrospective analysis of national programme data and qualitative findings
title Implementing SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing scale-up in Rwanda: retrospective analysis of national programme data and qualitative findings
title_full Implementing SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing scale-up in Rwanda: retrospective analysis of national programme data and qualitative findings
title_fullStr Implementing SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing scale-up in Rwanda: retrospective analysis of national programme data and qualitative findings
title_full_unstemmed Implementing SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing scale-up in Rwanda: retrospective analysis of national programme data and qualitative findings
title_short Implementing SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing scale-up in Rwanda: retrospective analysis of national programme data and qualitative findings
title_sort implementing sars-cov-2 antigen testing scale-up in rwanda: retrospective analysis of national programme data and qualitative findings
topic Global Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10151244/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37185639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066776
work_keys_str_mv AT rutayisirerobert implementingsarscov2antigentestingscaleupinrwandaretrospectiveanalysisofnationalprogrammedataandqualitativefindings
AT boekecarolinee implementingsarscov2antigentestingscaleupinrwandaretrospectiveanalysisofnationalprogrammedataandqualitativefindings
AT josephjessica implementingsarscov2antigentestingscaleupinrwandaretrospectiveanalysisofnationalprogrammedataandqualitativefindings
AT bansalnamita implementingsarscov2antigentestingscaleupinrwandaretrospectiveanalysisofnationalprogrammedataandqualitativefindings
AT bigirimananoella implementingsarscov2antigentestingscaleupinrwandaretrospectiveanalysisofnationalprogrammedataandqualitativefindings
AT demkeowen implementingsarscov2antigentestingscaleupinrwandaretrospectiveanalysisofnationalprogrammedataandqualitativefindings
AT kallarakalashley implementingsarscov2antigentestingscaleupinrwandaretrospectiveanalysisofnationalprogrammedataandqualitativefindings
AT karameprosper implementingsarscov2antigentestingscaleupinrwandaretrospectiveanalysisofnationalprogrammedataandqualitativefindings
AT ndayishimiyerodrigue implementingsarscov2antigentestingscaleupinrwandaretrospectiveanalysisofnationalprogrammedataandqualitativefindings
AT umumararunguesperance implementingsarscov2antigentestingscaleupinrwandaretrospectiveanalysisofnationalprogrammedataandqualitativefindings
AT petertrevor implementingsarscov2antigentestingscaleupinrwandaretrospectiveanalysisofnationalprogrammedataandqualitativefindings
AT khanshaukat implementingsarscov2antigentestingscaleupinrwandaretrospectiveanalysisofnationalprogrammedataandqualitativefindings