Cargando…
Implementing SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing scale-up in Rwanda: retrospective analysis of national programme data and qualitative findings
OBJECTIVES: Reverse transcriptase PCR is the most sensitive test for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. However, the scale-up of these tests in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) has been limited due to infrastructure and cost. Antigen rapid diagnostic tests are an alternative option for diagnosing a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10151244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37185639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066776 |
_version_ | 1785035498976182272 |
---|---|
author | Rutayisire, Robert Boeke, Caroline E Joseph, Jessica Bansal, Namita Bigirimana, Noella Demke, Owen Kallarakal, Ashley Karame, Prosper Ndayishimiye, Rodrigue Umumararungu, Esperance Peter, Trevor Khan, Shaukat |
author_facet | Rutayisire, Robert Boeke, Caroline E Joseph, Jessica Bansal, Namita Bigirimana, Noella Demke, Owen Kallarakal, Ashley Karame, Prosper Ndayishimiye, Rodrigue Umumararungu, Esperance Peter, Trevor Khan, Shaukat |
author_sort | Rutayisire, Robert |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Reverse transcriptase PCR is the most sensitive test for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. However, the scale-up of these tests in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) has been limited due to infrastructure and cost. Antigen rapid diagnostic tests are an alternative option for diagnosing active infection that may allow for faster, easier, less expensive and more widespread testing. We compared the implementation of antigen and PCR testing programmes in Rwanda. DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed routinely collected PCR and antigen testing data for all reported tests conducted nationally. We administered semiquantitative surveys to healthcare workers (HCWs) involved in COVID-19 testing and care and clients receiving antigen testing. SETTING: Rwanda, November 2020–July 2021. PARTICIPANTS: National SARS-CoV-2 testing data; 49 HCWs involved in COVID-19 testing and care; 145 clients receiving antigen testing. INTERVENTIONS: None (retrospective analysis of programme data). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Test volumes, turnaround times, feasibility and acceptability of antigen testing. RESULTS: Data from 906 204 antigen tests and 445 235 PCR tests were included. Antigen testing increased test availability and case identification compared with PCR and had a median results return time of 0 days (IQR: 0–0). In contrast, PCR testing time ranged from 1 to 18 days depending on the sample collection site/district. Both HCWs and clients indicated that antigen testing was feasible and acceptable. Some HCWs identified stockouts and limited healthcare staff as challenges. CONCLUSIONS: Antigen testing facilitated rapid expansion and decentralisation of SARS-CoV-2 testing across lower tier facilities in Rwanda, contributed to increased case identification, reduced test processing times, and was determined to be feasible and acceptable to clients and providers. Antigen testing will be an essential component of SARS-CoV-2 test and treat programmes in LMICs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10151244 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101512442023-05-02 Implementing SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing scale-up in Rwanda: retrospective analysis of national programme data and qualitative findings Rutayisire, Robert Boeke, Caroline E Joseph, Jessica Bansal, Namita Bigirimana, Noella Demke, Owen Kallarakal, Ashley Karame, Prosper Ndayishimiye, Rodrigue Umumararungu, Esperance Peter, Trevor Khan, Shaukat BMJ Open Global Health OBJECTIVES: Reverse transcriptase PCR is the most sensitive test for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. However, the scale-up of these tests in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) has been limited due to infrastructure and cost. Antigen rapid diagnostic tests are an alternative option for diagnosing active infection that may allow for faster, easier, less expensive and more widespread testing. We compared the implementation of antigen and PCR testing programmes in Rwanda. DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed routinely collected PCR and antigen testing data for all reported tests conducted nationally. We administered semiquantitative surveys to healthcare workers (HCWs) involved in COVID-19 testing and care and clients receiving antigen testing. SETTING: Rwanda, November 2020–July 2021. PARTICIPANTS: National SARS-CoV-2 testing data; 49 HCWs involved in COVID-19 testing and care; 145 clients receiving antigen testing. INTERVENTIONS: None (retrospective analysis of programme data). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Test volumes, turnaround times, feasibility and acceptability of antigen testing. RESULTS: Data from 906 204 antigen tests and 445 235 PCR tests were included. Antigen testing increased test availability and case identification compared with PCR and had a median results return time of 0 days (IQR: 0–0). In contrast, PCR testing time ranged from 1 to 18 days depending on the sample collection site/district. Both HCWs and clients indicated that antigen testing was feasible and acceptable. Some HCWs identified stockouts and limited healthcare staff as challenges. CONCLUSIONS: Antigen testing facilitated rapid expansion and decentralisation of SARS-CoV-2 testing across lower tier facilities in Rwanda, contributed to increased case identification, reduced test processing times, and was determined to be feasible and acceptable to clients and providers. Antigen testing will be an essential component of SARS-CoV-2 test and treat programmes in LMICs. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10151244/ /pubmed/37185639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066776 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Global Health Rutayisire, Robert Boeke, Caroline E Joseph, Jessica Bansal, Namita Bigirimana, Noella Demke, Owen Kallarakal, Ashley Karame, Prosper Ndayishimiye, Rodrigue Umumararungu, Esperance Peter, Trevor Khan, Shaukat Implementing SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing scale-up in Rwanda: retrospective analysis of national programme data and qualitative findings |
title | Implementing SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing scale-up in Rwanda: retrospective analysis of national programme data and qualitative findings |
title_full | Implementing SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing scale-up in Rwanda: retrospective analysis of national programme data and qualitative findings |
title_fullStr | Implementing SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing scale-up in Rwanda: retrospective analysis of national programme data and qualitative findings |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementing SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing scale-up in Rwanda: retrospective analysis of national programme data and qualitative findings |
title_short | Implementing SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing scale-up in Rwanda: retrospective analysis of national programme data and qualitative findings |
title_sort | implementing sars-cov-2 antigen testing scale-up in rwanda: retrospective analysis of national programme data and qualitative findings |
topic | Global Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10151244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37185639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066776 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rutayisirerobert implementingsarscov2antigentestingscaleupinrwandaretrospectiveanalysisofnationalprogrammedataandqualitativefindings AT boekecarolinee implementingsarscov2antigentestingscaleupinrwandaretrospectiveanalysisofnationalprogrammedataandqualitativefindings AT josephjessica implementingsarscov2antigentestingscaleupinrwandaretrospectiveanalysisofnationalprogrammedataandqualitativefindings AT bansalnamita implementingsarscov2antigentestingscaleupinrwandaretrospectiveanalysisofnationalprogrammedataandqualitativefindings AT bigirimananoella implementingsarscov2antigentestingscaleupinrwandaretrospectiveanalysisofnationalprogrammedataandqualitativefindings AT demkeowen implementingsarscov2antigentestingscaleupinrwandaretrospectiveanalysisofnationalprogrammedataandqualitativefindings AT kallarakalashley implementingsarscov2antigentestingscaleupinrwandaretrospectiveanalysisofnationalprogrammedataandqualitativefindings AT karameprosper implementingsarscov2antigentestingscaleupinrwandaretrospectiveanalysisofnationalprogrammedataandqualitativefindings AT ndayishimiyerodrigue implementingsarscov2antigentestingscaleupinrwandaretrospectiveanalysisofnationalprogrammedataandqualitativefindings AT umumararunguesperance implementingsarscov2antigentestingscaleupinrwandaretrospectiveanalysisofnationalprogrammedataandqualitativefindings AT petertrevor implementingsarscov2antigentestingscaleupinrwandaretrospectiveanalysisofnationalprogrammedataandqualitativefindings AT khanshaukat implementingsarscov2antigentestingscaleupinrwandaretrospectiveanalysisofnationalprogrammedataandqualitativefindings |