Cargando…

Effect of tablet tilt positioning on ergonomic risks and respiratory function

The static posture associated with continuous tablet use can lead to musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and upper extremities as well as respiratory function disorders. We hypothesized that 0-degree tablet placement (flat on a table) would affect ergonomic risks and respiratory function. Eighteen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vannajak, Pimonpan Taweekarn, Vannajak, Kunavut
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10151345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37144190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15654
_version_ 1785035519410831360
author Vannajak, Pimonpan Taweekarn
Vannajak, Kunavut
author_facet Vannajak, Pimonpan Taweekarn
Vannajak, Kunavut
author_sort Vannajak, Pimonpan Taweekarn
collection PubMed
description The static posture associated with continuous tablet use can lead to musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and upper extremities as well as respiratory function disorders. We hypothesized that 0-degree tablet placement (flat on a table) would affect ergonomic risks and respiratory function. Eighteen undergraduate students were divided into two groups (n = 9 per group). In the first group, the tablet was placed at a 0-degree angle, whereas in the second group, it was placed at a 40- to 55-degree angle on a student learning chair. The tablet was used continuously for 2 h for writing and internet use. Rapid upper-limb assessment (RULA), craniovertebral angle, and respiratory function were assessed. There was no significant difference in respiratory function, including forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV(1)/FVC, between the groups (p = 0.09) or within groups. However, there was a statistically significant between-group difference in RULA (p = 0.001), with the 0-degree group having a greater ergonomic risk. There were also significant within-group differences between pre- and posttest. The CV angle differed significantly between groups (p = 0.03), whereby the 0-degree group had poor posture, as well as within the 0-degree group (p = 0.039), though not within the 40- to 55-degree group (p = 0.067). Undergraduate students who place their tablets at a 0-degree angle face increased ergonomic risks and higher potential for developing musculoskeletal disorders and poor posture. Thus, elevating the tablet and instituting rest intervals may prevent or decrease the ergonomic risks among tablet users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10151345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101513452023-05-03 Effect of tablet tilt positioning on ergonomic risks and respiratory function Vannajak, Pimonpan Taweekarn Vannajak, Kunavut Heliyon Research Article The static posture associated with continuous tablet use can lead to musculoskeletal disorders of the neck and upper extremities as well as respiratory function disorders. We hypothesized that 0-degree tablet placement (flat on a table) would affect ergonomic risks and respiratory function. Eighteen undergraduate students were divided into two groups (n = 9 per group). In the first group, the tablet was placed at a 0-degree angle, whereas in the second group, it was placed at a 40- to 55-degree angle on a student learning chair. The tablet was used continuously for 2 h for writing and internet use. Rapid upper-limb assessment (RULA), craniovertebral angle, and respiratory function were assessed. There was no significant difference in respiratory function, including forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV(1)/FVC, between the groups (p = 0.09) or within groups. However, there was a statistically significant between-group difference in RULA (p = 0.001), with the 0-degree group having a greater ergonomic risk. There were also significant within-group differences between pre- and posttest. The CV angle differed significantly between groups (p = 0.03), whereby the 0-degree group had poor posture, as well as within the 0-degree group (p = 0.039), though not within the 40- to 55-degree group (p = 0.067). Undergraduate students who place their tablets at a 0-degree angle face increased ergonomic risks and higher potential for developing musculoskeletal disorders and poor posture. Thus, elevating the tablet and instituting rest intervals may prevent or decrease the ergonomic risks among tablet users. Elsevier 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10151345/ /pubmed/37144190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15654 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Vannajak, Pimonpan Taweekarn
Vannajak, Kunavut
Effect of tablet tilt positioning on ergonomic risks and respiratory function
title Effect of tablet tilt positioning on ergonomic risks and respiratory function
title_full Effect of tablet tilt positioning on ergonomic risks and respiratory function
title_fullStr Effect of tablet tilt positioning on ergonomic risks and respiratory function
title_full_unstemmed Effect of tablet tilt positioning on ergonomic risks and respiratory function
title_short Effect of tablet tilt positioning on ergonomic risks and respiratory function
title_sort effect of tablet tilt positioning on ergonomic risks and respiratory function
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10151345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37144190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15654
work_keys_str_mv AT vannajakpimonpantaweekarn effectoftablettiltpositioningonergonomicrisksandrespiratoryfunction
AT vannajakkunavut effectoftablettiltpositioningonergonomicrisksandrespiratoryfunction