Cargando…

Supreme Court cases on affirmative action threaten diversity in medicine

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Aaron, Daniel G., Bajaj, Simar S., Stanford, Fatima Cody
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	National Academy of Sciences 2023
Materias:	Opinion
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10151613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37075073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2220919120

Ejemplares similares

Protecting marginalized women’s mental health in the post-Dobbs era
por: Nguyen, Dang, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Supreme Judicial Court
Publicado: (1869)

The two-child limit for benefits in the Supreme Court: implications for public health
por: Machin, R
Publicado: (2021)

The Supreme Court in American history /
por: Fribourg, Marjorie G.
Publicado: (1969)

Law and legitimacy in the Supreme Court /
por: Fallon, Richard H., Jr., 1952-
Publicado: (2018)

Supreme Court of the United States
por: Middleton, D. W.
Publicado: (1877)

A Supreme Court Decision
por: Chappell, J. A.
Publicado: (1899)

United States Supreme Court
Publicado: (1897)

Supreme Court and the Practice of Oncology
por: Chabner, Bruce A, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Relevant decisions of the Mexican Supreme Court /
Publicado: (2006)

Important Decision of the Supreme Court on Imitations
Publicado: (1883)

Decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the Rubber Case
Publicado: (1873)

The Hidden History of the Supreme Court and the Betrayal of America
por: Hartmann, Thom
Publicado: (2019)

An important Supreme Court decision for the dental field
por: Lee, Won
Publicado: (2016)

Supreme Court Ruling - pay out for dentists?
Publicado: (2021)

US supreme court decision: the gastroenterological perspective
por: Lahat, Adi, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Perceived Masculinity Predicts U.S. Supreme Court Outcomes
por: Chen, Daniel, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Justice Blocks and Predictability of U.S. Supreme Court Votes
por: Guimerà, Roger, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

US Supreme Court upholds abortion rights, for now
por: Jaffe, Susan
Publicado: (2020)

Supreme Court Decision: No. 67. October Term, 1880
por: McKenney, James H.
Publicado: (1881)

The United States Supreme Court Decision in “Tooth Crowns”
Publicado: (1891)

A dataset for predicting Supreme Court judgments in Nigeria
por: Ngige, O.C., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The Benoni E. Gardner Appeal Case in the Supreme Court of the United States
Publicado: (1872)

A general approach for predicting the behavior of the Supreme Court of the United States
por: Katz, Daniel Martin, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Conceptual and Scientific Defects in the Supreme Court’s “Method of Execution” Jurisprudence
por: Dow, David R., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The CMS Vaccine Mandate at the Supreme Court: A Hippocratic Imperative
por: Adashi, Eli Y., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Supreme Court State of New York: County of New York
por: Hamilton, Thomas L.
Publicado: (1904)

The New CDC Mask Guidance: A Catastrophe for Health Equity
por: Bajaj, Simar Singh, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Implications and reflections on the 2010 Supreme Court ruling on Canada’s AHR Act
por: Deonandan, Raywat, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Supreme Court 2019–2020: Insanity, Discrimination, and DACA—And a Pandemic
por: Smith, Steven R.
Publicado: (2020)

‘The “Strongest” Climate Ruling Yet’: The Dutch Supreme Court’s Urgenda Judgment
por: Spier, Jaap
Publicado: (2020)

Supreme Court v. Necropolitics: The Chaotic Judicialization of COVID-19 in Brazil
por: Biehl, João, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Letter to the Editor: Prohibition, the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, and the Supreme Court.—D.
por: Russell, K. C.
Publicado: (1911)

Forensic psychiatry in Pakistan: Where next following the Supreme Court judgement
por: Hassan, T.
Publicado: (2022)

The Importance of the International Community in Protecting the Right to Abortion: The Cases of Malta and of the US Supreme Court
por: Cioffi, Andrea, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Randomized clinical trials of weight loss: Pragmatic and digital strategies and innovations
por: Jain, Bhav, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

International lack of equity in modern obesity therapy: the critical need for change in health policy
por: Roser, Pia, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Paradox of telemedicine: building or neglecting trust and equity
por: Yee, Vivian, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Liberalizing consent - Supreme Court's preference for ‘real consent’ over ‘informed consent’
por: Rangaramanujam, ATM
Publicado: (2008)

Gene patents at the Supreme Court: Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics
por: Bakshi, Ashish M.
Publicado: (2014)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_74u1qefiusucnt5s7vs7r6qbau