Cargando…

Efficiency and effectiveness of intensive multidisciplinary follow-up of patients with stroke/TIA or myocardial infarction compared to usual monitoring: protocol of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial. DiVa (Dijon vascular) study

INTRODUCTION: The ongoing ageing population is associated with an increase in the number of patients suffering a stroke, transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or myocardial infarction (MI). In these patients, implementing secondary prevention is a critical challenge and new strategies need to be develope...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Béjot, Yannick, Soilly, Anne-Laure, Bardou, Marc, Duloquin, Gauthier, Pommier, Thibaut, Laurent, Gabriel, Cottin, Yves, Vadot, Lucie, Adam, Héloïse, Boulin, Mathieu, Giroud, Maurice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10151851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37185649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070197
_version_ 1785035630830419968
author Béjot, Yannick
Soilly, Anne-Laure
Bardou, Marc
Duloquin, Gauthier
Pommier, Thibaut
Laurent, Gabriel
Cottin, Yves
Vadot, Lucie
Adam, Héloïse
Boulin, Mathieu
Giroud, Maurice
author_facet Béjot, Yannick
Soilly, Anne-Laure
Bardou, Marc
Duloquin, Gauthier
Pommier, Thibaut
Laurent, Gabriel
Cottin, Yves
Vadot, Lucie
Adam, Héloïse
Boulin, Mathieu
Giroud, Maurice
author_sort Béjot, Yannick
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The ongoing ageing population is associated with an increase in the number of patients suffering a stroke, transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or myocardial infarction (MI). In these patients, implementing secondary prevention is a critical challenge and new strategies need to be developed to close the gap between clinical practice and evidence-based recommendations. We describe the protocol of a randomised clinical trial that aims to evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of an intensive multidisciplinary follow-up of patients compared with standard care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The DiVa study is a randomised, prospective, controlled, multicentre trial including patients >18 years old with a first or recurrent stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic) or TIA, or a type I or II MI, managed in one of the participating hospitals of the study area, with a survival expectancy >12 months. Patients will be randomised with an allocation ratio of 1:1 in two parallel groups: one group assigned to a multidisciplinary, nurse-based and pharmacist-based 2-year follow-up in association with general practitioners, neurologists and cardiologists versus one group with usual follow-up. In each group for each disease (stroke/TIA or MI), 430 patients will be enrolled (total of 1720 patients) over 3 years. The primary outcome will be the incremental cost–utility ratio at 24 months between intensive and standard follow-up in a society perspective. Secondary outcomes will include the incremental cost–utility ratio at 6 and 12 months, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio at 24 months, reduction at 6, 12 and 24 months of the rates of death, unscheduled rehospitalisation and iatrogenic complications, changes in quality of life, net budgetary impact at 5 years of the intensive follow-up on the national health insurance perspective and analysis of factors having positive or negative effects on the implementation of the project in the study area. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained and all patients receive information about the study and give their consent to participate before randomisation. Results of the main trial and each of the secondary analyses will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04188457. Registered on 6 December 2019.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10151851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101518512023-05-03 Efficiency and effectiveness of intensive multidisciplinary follow-up of patients with stroke/TIA or myocardial infarction compared to usual monitoring: protocol of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial. DiVa (Dijon vascular) study Béjot, Yannick Soilly, Anne-Laure Bardou, Marc Duloquin, Gauthier Pommier, Thibaut Laurent, Gabriel Cottin, Yves Vadot, Lucie Adam, Héloïse Boulin, Mathieu Giroud, Maurice BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine INTRODUCTION: The ongoing ageing population is associated with an increase in the number of patients suffering a stroke, transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or myocardial infarction (MI). In these patients, implementing secondary prevention is a critical challenge and new strategies need to be developed to close the gap between clinical practice and evidence-based recommendations. We describe the protocol of a randomised clinical trial that aims to evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of an intensive multidisciplinary follow-up of patients compared with standard care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The DiVa study is a randomised, prospective, controlled, multicentre trial including patients >18 years old with a first or recurrent stroke (ischaemic or haemorrhagic) or TIA, or a type I or II MI, managed in one of the participating hospitals of the study area, with a survival expectancy >12 months. Patients will be randomised with an allocation ratio of 1:1 in two parallel groups: one group assigned to a multidisciplinary, nurse-based and pharmacist-based 2-year follow-up in association with general practitioners, neurologists and cardiologists versus one group with usual follow-up. In each group for each disease (stroke/TIA or MI), 430 patients will be enrolled (total of 1720 patients) over 3 years. The primary outcome will be the incremental cost–utility ratio at 24 months between intensive and standard follow-up in a society perspective. Secondary outcomes will include the incremental cost–utility ratio at 6 and 12 months, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio at 24 months, reduction at 6, 12 and 24 months of the rates of death, unscheduled rehospitalisation and iatrogenic complications, changes in quality of life, net budgetary impact at 5 years of the intensive follow-up on the national health insurance perspective and analysis of factors having positive or negative effects on the implementation of the project in the study area. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained and all patients receive information about the study and give their consent to participate before randomisation. Results of the main trial and each of the secondary analyses will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04188457. Registered on 6 December 2019. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10151851/ /pubmed/37185649 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070197 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Béjot, Yannick
Soilly, Anne-Laure
Bardou, Marc
Duloquin, Gauthier
Pommier, Thibaut
Laurent, Gabriel
Cottin, Yves
Vadot, Lucie
Adam, Héloïse
Boulin, Mathieu
Giroud, Maurice
Efficiency and effectiveness of intensive multidisciplinary follow-up of patients with stroke/TIA or myocardial infarction compared to usual monitoring: protocol of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial. DiVa (Dijon vascular) study
title Efficiency and effectiveness of intensive multidisciplinary follow-up of patients with stroke/TIA or myocardial infarction compared to usual monitoring: protocol of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial. DiVa (Dijon vascular) study
title_full Efficiency and effectiveness of intensive multidisciplinary follow-up of patients with stroke/TIA or myocardial infarction compared to usual monitoring: protocol of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial. DiVa (Dijon vascular) study
title_fullStr Efficiency and effectiveness of intensive multidisciplinary follow-up of patients with stroke/TIA or myocardial infarction compared to usual monitoring: protocol of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial. DiVa (Dijon vascular) study
title_full_unstemmed Efficiency and effectiveness of intensive multidisciplinary follow-up of patients with stroke/TIA or myocardial infarction compared to usual monitoring: protocol of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial. DiVa (Dijon vascular) study
title_short Efficiency and effectiveness of intensive multidisciplinary follow-up of patients with stroke/TIA or myocardial infarction compared to usual monitoring: protocol of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial. DiVa (Dijon vascular) study
title_sort efficiency and effectiveness of intensive multidisciplinary follow-up of patients with stroke/tia or myocardial infarction compared to usual monitoring: protocol of a pragmatic randomised clinical trial. diva (dijon vascular) study
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10151851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37185649
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070197
work_keys_str_mv AT bejotyannick efficiencyandeffectivenessofintensivemultidisciplinaryfollowupofpatientswithstroketiaormyocardialinfarctioncomparedtousualmonitoringprotocolofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialdivadijonvascularstudy
AT soillyannelaure efficiencyandeffectivenessofintensivemultidisciplinaryfollowupofpatientswithstroketiaormyocardialinfarctioncomparedtousualmonitoringprotocolofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialdivadijonvascularstudy
AT bardoumarc efficiencyandeffectivenessofintensivemultidisciplinaryfollowupofpatientswithstroketiaormyocardialinfarctioncomparedtousualmonitoringprotocolofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialdivadijonvascularstudy
AT duloquingauthier efficiencyandeffectivenessofintensivemultidisciplinaryfollowupofpatientswithstroketiaormyocardialinfarctioncomparedtousualmonitoringprotocolofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialdivadijonvascularstudy
AT pommierthibaut efficiencyandeffectivenessofintensivemultidisciplinaryfollowupofpatientswithstroketiaormyocardialinfarctioncomparedtousualmonitoringprotocolofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialdivadijonvascularstudy
AT laurentgabriel efficiencyandeffectivenessofintensivemultidisciplinaryfollowupofpatientswithstroketiaormyocardialinfarctioncomparedtousualmonitoringprotocolofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialdivadijonvascularstudy
AT cottinyves efficiencyandeffectivenessofintensivemultidisciplinaryfollowupofpatientswithstroketiaormyocardialinfarctioncomparedtousualmonitoringprotocolofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialdivadijonvascularstudy
AT vadotlucie efficiencyandeffectivenessofintensivemultidisciplinaryfollowupofpatientswithstroketiaormyocardialinfarctioncomparedtousualmonitoringprotocolofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialdivadijonvascularstudy
AT adamheloise efficiencyandeffectivenessofintensivemultidisciplinaryfollowupofpatientswithstroketiaormyocardialinfarctioncomparedtousualmonitoringprotocolofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialdivadijonvascularstudy
AT boulinmathieu efficiencyandeffectivenessofintensivemultidisciplinaryfollowupofpatientswithstroketiaormyocardialinfarctioncomparedtousualmonitoringprotocolofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialdivadijonvascularstudy
AT giroudmaurice efficiencyandeffectivenessofintensivemultidisciplinaryfollowupofpatientswithstroketiaormyocardialinfarctioncomparedtousualmonitoringprotocolofapragmaticrandomisedclinicaltrialdivadijonvascularstudy