Cargando…

Stool specimen for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in adults: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of stool specimens to diagnose pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) in adults. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Web of Science and the Cochrane database were searched from inception to 9 March 2023–10 March 2023 using a comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sultana, Saima, Afrin, Sadia, Hasan, Mahamudul, Ansar, Adnan, Saif-Ur-Rahman, KM
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10151869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37105702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062135
_version_ 1785035634595856384
author Sultana, Saima
Afrin, Sadia
Hasan, Mahamudul
Ansar, Adnan
Saif-Ur-Rahman, KM
author_facet Sultana, Saima
Afrin, Sadia
Hasan, Mahamudul
Ansar, Adnan
Saif-Ur-Rahman, KM
author_sort Sultana, Saima
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of stool specimens to diagnose pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) in adults. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Web of Science and the Cochrane database were searched from inception to 9 March 2023–10 March 2023 using a comprehensive search strategy; reference lists of selected articles and relevant review articles were manually searched. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Studies in English reporting diagnostic performance of stool specimens against respiratory specimens using mycobacterial culture or smear microscopy or Xpert assay to diagnose PTB in adults were eligible for this systematic review. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently screened the retrieved citations and extracted data. The risk of bias and applicability of results were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Narrative data synthesis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 1658 citations were screened, and 28 full-text articles were assessed. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. The reported sensitivity and specificity of stool culture varied between 21.4% and 63.9%, and 61.5% and 100%, respectively. In stool smear microscopy, sensitivities and specificities ranged from 12.1% to 53.9%, and from 79.5% to 100%, respectively. The reported sensitivities of PCR assays, including Xpert assays, ranged from 69.7% to 100%, with specificities ranging from 69.8% to 100%. Most of the studies had a low risk of bias and a low applicability concern in all domains. CONCLUSION: This systematic review could not conclude on the diagnostic accuracy of stool specimens for PTB diagnosis in adults. Further studies are required to evaluate the accuracy of stool specimens in adults to enable meta-analyses in updates of this review as well as other systematic reviews. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021245203.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10151869
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101518692023-05-03 Stool specimen for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in adults: a systematic review Sultana, Saima Afrin, Sadia Hasan, Mahamudul Ansar, Adnan Saif-Ur-Rahman, KM BMJ Open Infectious Diseases OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of stool specimens to diagnose pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) in adults. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), Web of Science and the Cochrane database were searched from inception to 9 March 2023–10 March 2023 using a comprehensive search strategy; reference lists of selected articles and relevant review articles were manually searched. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Studies in English reporting diagnostic performance of stool specimens against respiratory specimens using mycobacterial culture or smear microscopy or Xpert assay to diagnose PTB in adults were eligible for this systematic review. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently screened the retrieved citations and extracted data. The risk of bias and applicability of results were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Narrative data synthesis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 1658 citations were screened, and 28 full-text articles were assessed. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. The reported sensitivity and specificity of stool culture varied between 21.4% and 63.9%, and 61.5% and 100%, respectively. In stool smear microscopy, sensitivities and specificities ranged from 12.1% to 53.9%, and from 79.5% to 100%, respectively. The reported sensitivities of PCR assays, including Xpert assays, ranged from 69.7% to 100%, with specificities ranging from 69.8% to 100%. Most of the studies had a low risk of bias and a low applicability concern in all domains. CONCLUSION: This systematic review could not conclude on the diagnostic accuracy of stool specimens for PTB diagnosis in adults. Further studies are required to evaluate the accuracy of stool specimens in adults to enable meta-analyses in updates of this review as well as other systematic reviews. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021245203. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10151869/ /pubmed/37105702 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062135 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Infectious Diseases
Sultana, Saima
Afrin, Sadia
Hasan, Mahamudul
Ansar, Adnan
Saif-Ur-Rahman, KM
Stool specimen for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in adults: a systematic review
title Stool specimen for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in adults: a systematic review
title_full Stool specimen for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in adults: a systematic review
title_fullStr Stool specimen for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in adults: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Stool specimen for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in adults: a systematic review
title_short Stool specimen for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in adults: a systematic review
title_sort stool specimen for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in adults: a systematic review
topic Infectious Diseases
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10151869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37105702
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062135
work_keys_str_mv AT sultanasaima stoolspecimenfordiagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisinadultsasystematicreview
AT afrinsadia stoolspecimenfordiagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisinadultsasystematicreview
AT hasanmahamudul stoolspecimenfordiagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisinadultsasystematicreview
AT ansaradnan stoolspecimenfordiagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisinadultsasystematicreview
AT saifurrahmankm stoolspecimenfordiagnosisofpulmonarytuberculosisinadultsasystematicreview