Cargando…
Testing the effectiveness of a mobile approach avoidance intervention and measuring approach biases in an ecological momentary assessment context: study protocol for a randomised-controlled trial
INTRODUCTION: Unhealthy eating behaviour is a major contributor to obesity and related diseases and is associated with a behavioural bias to approach rather than avoid desired foods, as measured with reaction time tasks. Approach-avoidance interventions (AAIs) have been proposed as a way to modify f...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10151942/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37185192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070443 |
_version_ | 1785035649182597120 |
---|---|
author | Aulbach, Matthias Burkard van Alebeek, Hannah Kahveci, Sercan Blechert, Jens |
author_facet | Aulbach, Matthias Burkard van Alebeek, Hannah Kahveci, Sercan Blechert, Jens |
author_sort | Aulbach, Matthias Burkard |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Unhealthy eating behaviour is a major contributor to obesity and related diseases and is associated with a behavioural bias to approach rather than avoid desired foods, as measured with reaction time tasks. Approach-avoidance interventions (AAIs) have been proposed as a way to modify food evaluations and help people to eat in accordance with their dietary goals. Mobile implementations of AAI might be easily accessible, low threshold interventions, but their effectiveness has not been established yet. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Participants who aim to change their eating behaviour are randomised to intervention or control groups. They complete six sessions of a smartphone-based AAI, in which they push (ie, avoid) or pull (ie, approach) personalised food images. Intervention group participants always avoid foods that they personally want to eat less often and approach foods that they personally want to eat more often. In the control group, images are paired equally often with both response directions. To evaluate contextual and dynamic intervention effects, ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is measured throughout, with questions about food intake, hunger, stress, emotions, eating intentions, food craving and impulsivity twice a day. Additional EMA preintervention and postintervention measures are administered before and after the intervention phase (4 days each) with a 1-day follow-up EMA 4 weeks after the intervention. Multilevel models will examine the temporal covariance between approach bias and self-reported variables as well as short-term and long-term intervention effects on approach bias, food intake and craving. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Salzburg. Results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS, registration number DRKS00030780. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10151942 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101519422023-05-03 Testing the effectiveness of a mobile approach avoidance intervention and measuring approach biases in an ecological momentary assessment context: study protocol for a randomised-controlled trial Aulbach, Matthias Burkard van Alebeek, Hannah Kahveci, Sercan Blechert, Jens BMJ Open Nutrition and Metabolism INTRODUCTION: Unhealthy eating behaviour is a major contributor to obesity and related diseases and is associated with a behavioural bias to approach rather than avoid desired foods, as measured with reaction time tasks. Approach-avoidance interventions (AAIs) have been proposed as a way to modify food evaluations and help people to eat in accordance with their dietary goals. Mobile implementations of AAI might be easily accessible, low threshold interventions, but their effectiveness has not been established yet. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Participants who aim to change their eating behaviour are randomised to intervention or control groups. They complete six sessions of a smartphone-based AAI, in which they push (ie, avoid) or pull (ie, approach) personalised food images. Intervention group participants always avoid foods that they personally want to eat less often and approach foods that they personally want to eat more often. In the control group, images are paired equally often with both response directions. To evaluate contextual and dynamic intervention effects, ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is measured throughout, with questions about food intake, hunger, stress, emotions, eating intentions, food craving and impulsivity twice a day. Additional EMA preintervention and postintervention measures are administered before and after the intervention phase (4 days each) with a 1-day follow-up EMA 4 weeks after the intervention. Multilevel models will examine the temporal covariance between approach bias and self-reported variables as well as short-term and long-term intervention effects on approach bias, food intake and craving. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Salzburg. Results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS, registration number DRKS00030780. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10151942/ /pubmed/37185192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070443 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Nutrition and Metabolism Aulbach, Matthias Burkard van Alebeek, Hannah Kahveci, Sercan Blechert, Jens Testing the effectiveness of a mobile approach avoidance intervention and measuring approach biases in an ecological momentary assessment context: study protocol for a randomised-controlled trial |
title | Testing the effectiveness of a mobile approach avoidance intervention and measuring approach biases in an ecological momentary assessment context: study protocol for a randomised-controlled trial |
title_full | Testing the effectiveness of a mobile approach avoidance intervention and measuring approach biases in an ecological momentary assessment context: study protocol for a randomised-controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Testing the effectiveness of a mobile approach avoidance intervention and measuring approach biases in an ecological momentary assessment context: study protocol for a randomised-controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Testing the effectiveness of a mobile approach avoidance intervention and measuring approach biases in an ecological momentary assessment context: study protocol for a randomised-controlled trial |
title_short | Testing the effectiveness of a mobile approach avoidance intervention and measuring approach biases in an ecological momentary assessment context: study protocol for a randomised-controlled trial |
title_sort | testing the effectiveness of a mobile approach avoidance intervention and measuring approach biases in an ecological momentary assessment context: study protocol for a randomised-controlled trial |
topic | Nutrition and Metabolism |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10151942/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37185192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070443 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aulbachmatthiasburkard testingtheeffectivenessofamobileapproachavoidanceinterventionandmeasuringapproachbiasesinanecologicalmomentaryassessmentcontextstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT vanalebeekhannah testingtheeffectivenessofamobileapproachavoidanceinterventionandmeasuringapproachbiasesinanecologicalmomentaryassessmentcontextstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kahvecisercan testingtheeffectivenessofamobileapproachavoidanceinterventionandmeasuringapproachbiasesinanecologicalmomentaryassessmentcontextstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT blechertjens testingtheeffectivenessofamobileapproachavoidanceinterventionandmeasuringapproachbiasesinanecologicalmomentaryassessmentcontextstudyprotocolforarandomisedcontrolledtrial |