Cargando…

Moral distress among intensive care unit professions in the UK: a mixed-methods study

OBJECTIVE: To assess the experience of moral distress among intensive care unit (ICU) professionals in the UK. DESIGN: Mixed methods: validated quantitative measure of moral distress followed by purposive sample of respondents who underwent semistructured interviews. SETTING: Four ICUs of varying si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boulton, Adam Jonathan, Slowther, Anne-Marie, Yeung, Joyce, Bassford, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10151959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37185186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068918
_version_ 1785035652940693504
author Boulton, Adam Jonathan
Slowther, Anne-Marie
Yeung, Joyce
Bassford, Christopher
author_facet Boulton, Adam Jonathan
Slowther, Anne-Marie
Yeung, Joyce
Bassford, Christopher
author_sort Boulton, Adam Jonathan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the experience of moral distress among intensive care unit (ICU) professionals in the UK. DESIGN: Mixed methods: validated quantitative measure of moral distress followed by purposive sample of respondents who underwent semistructured interviews. SETTING: Four ICUs of varying sizes and specialty facilities. PARTICIPANTS: Healthcare professionals working in ICU. RESULTS: 227 questionnaires were returned and 15 interviews performed. Moral distress occurred across all ICUs and professional demographics. It was most commonly related to providing care perceived as futile or against the patient’s wishes/interests, followed by resource constraints compromising care. Moral distress score was independently influenced by profession (p=0.02) (nurses 117.0 vs doctors 78.0). A lack of agency was central to moral distress and its negative experience could lead to withdrawal from engaging with patients/families. One-third indicated their intention to leave their current post due to moral distress and this was greater among nurses than doctors (37.0% vs 15.0%). Moral distress was independently associated with an intention to leave their current post (p<0.0001) and a previous post (p=0.001). Participants described a range of individualised coping strategies tailored to the situations faced. The most common and highly valued strategies were informal and relied on working within a supportive environment along with a close-knit team, although participants acknowledged there was a role for structured and formalised intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Moral distress is widespread among UK ICU professionals and can have an important negative impact on patient care, professional wellbeing and staff retention, a particularly concerning finding as this study was performed prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Moral distress due to resource-related issues is more severe than comparable studies in North America. Interventions to support professionals should recognise the individualistic nature of coping with moral distress. The value of close-knit teams and supportive environments has implications for how intensive care services are organised.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10151959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101519592023-05-03 Moral distress among intensive care unit professions in the UK: a mixed-methods study Boulton, Adam Jonathan Slowther, Anne-Marie Yeung, Joyce Bassford, Christopher BMJ Open Intensive Care OBJECTIVE: To assess the experience of moral distress among intensive care unit (ICU) professionals in the UK. DESIGN: Mixed methods: validated quantitative measure of moral distress followed by purposive sample of respondents who underwent semistructured interviews. SETTING: Four ICUs of varying sizes and specialty facilities. PARTICIPANTS: Healthcare professionals working in ICU. RESULTS: 227 questionnaires were returned and 15 interviews performed. Moral distress occurred across all ICUs and professional demographics. It was most commonly related to providing care perceived as futile or against the patient’s wishes/interests, followed by resource constraints compromising care. Moral distress score was independently influenced by profession (p=0.02) (nurses 117.0 vs doctors 78.0). A lack of agency was central to moral distress and its negative experience could lead to withdrawal from engaging with patients/families. One-third indicated their intention to leave their current post due to moral distress and this was greater among nurses than doctors (37.0% vs 15.0%). Moral distress was independently associated with an intention to leave their current post (p<0.0001) and a previous post (p=0.001). Participants described a range of individualised coping strategies tailored to the situations faced. The most common and highly valued strategies were informal and relied on working within a supportive environment along with a close-knit team, although participants acknowledged there was a role for structured and formalised intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Moral distress is widespread among UK ICU professionals and can have an important negative impact on patient care, professional wellbeing and staff retention, a particularly concerning finding as this study was performed prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Moral distress due to resource-related issues is more severe than comparable studies in North America. Interventions to support professionals should recognise the individualistic nature of coping with moral distress. The value of close-knit teams and supportive environments has implications for how intensive care services are organised. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10151959/ /pubmed/37185186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068918 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Intensive Care
Boulton, Adam Jonathan
Slowther, Anne-Marie
Yeung, Joyce
Bassford, Christopher
Moral distress among intensive care unit professions in the UK: a mixed-methods study
title Moral distress among intensive care unit professions in the UK: a mixed-methods study
title_full Moral distress among intensive care unit professions in the UK: a mixed-methods study
title_fullStr Moral distress among intensive care unit professions in the UK: a mixed-methods study
title_full_unstemmed Moral distress among intensive care unit professions in the UK: a mixed-methods study
title_short Moral distress among intensive care unit professions in the UK: a mixed-methods study
title_sort moral distress among intensive care unit professions in the uk: a mixed-methods study
topic Intensive Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10151959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37185186
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068918
work_keys_str_mv AT boultonadamjonathan moraldistressamongintensivecareunitprofessionsintheukamixedmethodsstudy
AT slowtherannemarie moraldistressamongintensivecareunitprofessionsintheukamixedmethodsstudy
AT yeungjoyce moraldistressamongintensivecareunitprofessionsintheukamixedmethodsstudy
AT bassfordchristopher moraldistressamongintensivecareunitprofessionsintheukamixedmethodsstudy