Cargando…

Protocol for a realist and social return on investment evaluation of the use of patient-reported outcomes in four value-based healthcare programmes

INTRODUCTION: There is growing recognition that in order to remain sustainable, the UK’s National Health Service must deliver the best patient outcomes within available resources. This focus on outcomes relative to cost is the basis of value-based healthcare (VBHC) and has led to interest in the rec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roberts, Gareth, Cahill, Adele, Lawthom, Charlotte, Price, Martine, Blyth, Christopher, Jones, Carys, Mc Laughlin, Leah, Noyes, Jane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10151973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37105686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072234
_version_ 1785035655823228928
author Roberts, Gareth
Cahill, Adele
Lawthom, Charlotte
Price, Martine
Blyth, Christopher
Jones, Carys
Mc Laughlin, Leah
Noyes, Jane
author_facet Roberts, Gareth
Cahill, Adele
Lawthom, Charlotte
Price, Martine
Blyth, Christopher
Jones, Carys
Mc Laughlin, Leah
Noyes, Jane
author_sort Roberts, Gareth
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: There is growing recognition that in order to remain sustainable, the UK’s National Health Service must deliver the best patient outcomes within available resources. This focus on outcomes relative to cost is the basis of value-based healthcare (VBHC) and has led to interest in the recording of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to measure patient perspectives on the impact of a health condition on their lives. Every health board in Wales is now required to collect PROMS as part of routine care. We will evaluate the VBHC programme implemented in a lead health board. The study aim is to understand what works about PROMs collection, for whom, in what contexts and why in a VBHC context. In addition, we will assess the social value of integrating PROMs collection into routine care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A three-stage mixed-methods study comprising a realist evaluation integrated with social return on investment (SROI) analysis across four conditions; Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy, heart failure and cataract surgery. Workstream 1: Development of logic models, informed by a scoping review, documentary analysis, patient and public involvement (PPI), staff and key stakeholder engagement. Workstream 2: Realist evaluation building on multiple data sources from stages 1 to 3 to test and refine the programme theories that arise from the logic model development. Workstream 3: SROI analysis using interview data with patients, staff and carers, stakeholder and PPI engagement, anonymised routinely collected data, and questionnaires to populate a model that will explore the social value generated by the implementation of PROMs. Findings across stages will be validated with key stakeholders. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by Wales Research Ethics Committee #5 (22/WA/0044). Outcomes will be shared with key stakeholders, published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) licence, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build on this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10151973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101519732023-05-03 Protocol for a realist and social return on investment evaluation of the use of patient-reported outcomes in four value-based healthcare programmes Roberts, Gareth Cahill, Adele Lawthom, Charlotte Price, Martine Blyth, Christopher Jones, Carys Mc Laughlin, Leah Noyes, Jane BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: There is growing recognition that in order to remain sustainable, the UK’s National Health Service must deliver the best patient outcomes within available resources. This focus on outcomes relative to cost is the basis of value-based healthcare (VBHC) and has led to interest in the recording of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to measure patient perspectives on the impact of a health condition on their lives. Every health board in Wales is now required to collect PROMS as part of routine care. We will evaluate the VBHC programme implemented in a lead health board. The study aim is to understand what works about PROMs collection, for whom, in what contexts and why in a VBHC context. In addition, we will assess the social value of integrating PROMs collection into routine care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A three-stage mixed-methods study comprising a realist evaluation integrated with social return on investment (SROI) analysis across four conditions; Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy, heart failure and cataract surgery. Workstream 1: Development of logic models, informed by a scoping review, documentary analysis, patient and public involvement (PPI), staff and key stakeholder engagement. Workstream 2: Realist evaluation building on multiple data sources from stages 1 to 3 to test and refine the programme theories that arise from the logic model development. Workstream 3: SROI analysis using interview data with patients, staff and carers, stakeholder and PPI engagement, anonymised routinely collected data, and questionnaires to populate a model that will explore the social value generated by the implementation of PROMs. Findings across stages will be validated with key stakeholders. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by Wales Research Ethics Committee #5 (22/WA/0044). Outcomes will be shared with key stakeholders, published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) licence, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build on this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10151973/ /pubmed/37105686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072234 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Roberts, Gareth
Cahill, Adele
Lawthom, Charlotte
Price, Martine
Blyth, Christopher
Jones, Carys
Mc Laughlin, Leah
Noyes, Jane
Protocol for a realist and social return on investment evaluation of the use of patient-reported outcomes in four value-based healthcare programmes
title Protocol for a realist and social return on investment evaluation of the use of patient-reported outcomes in four value-based healthcare programmes
title_full Protocol for a realist and social return on investment evaluation of the use of patient-reported outcomes in four value-based healthcare programmes
title_fullStr Protocol for a realist and social return on investment evaluation of the use of patient-reported outcomes in four value-based healthcare programmes
title_full_unstemmed Protocol for a realist and social return on investment evaluation of the use of patient-reported outcomes in four value-based healthcare programmes
title_short Protocol for a realist and social return on investment evaluation of the use of patient-reported outcomes in four value-based healthcare programmes
title_sort protocol for a realist and social return on investment evaluation of the use of patient-reported outcomes in four value-based healthcare programmes
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10151973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37105686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072234
work_keys_str_mv AT robertsgareth protocolforarealistandsocialreturnoninvestmentevaluationoftheuseofpatientreportedoutcomesinfourvaluebasedhealthcareprogrammes
AT cahilladele protocolforarealistandsocialreturnoninvestmentevaluationoftheuseofpatientreportedoutcomesinfourvaluebasedhealthcareprogrammes
AT lawthomcharlotte protocolforarealistandsocialreturnoninvestmentevaluationoftheuseofpatientreportedoutcomesinfourvaluebasedhealthcareprogrammes
AT pricemartine protocolforarealistandsocialreturnoninvestmentevaluationoftheuseofpatientreportedoutcomesinfourvaluebasedhealthcareprogrammes
AT blythchristopher protocolforarealistandsocialreturnoninvestmentevaluationoftheuseofpatientreportedoutcomesinfourvaluebasedhealthcareprogrammes
AT jonescarys protocolforarealistandsocialreturnoninvestmentevaluationoftheuseofpatientreportedoutcomesinfourvaluebasedhealthcareprogrammes
AT mclaughlinleah protocolforarealistandsocialreturnoninvestmentevaluationoftheuseofpatientreportedoutcomesinfourvaluebasedhealthcareprogrammes
AT noyesjane protocolforarealistandsocialreturnoninvestmentevaluationoftheuseofpatientreportedoutcomesinfourvaluebasedhealthcareprogrammes