Cargando…
Protocol for a realist and social return on investment evaluation of the use of patient-reported outcomes in four value-based healthcare programmes
INTRODUCTION: There is growing recognition that in order to remain sustainable, the UK’s National Health Service must deliver the best patient outcomes within available resources. This focus on outcomes relative to cost is the basis of value-based healthcare (VBHC) and has led to interest in the rec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10151973/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37105686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072234 |
_version_ | 1785035655823228928 |
---|---|
author | Roberts, Gareth Cahill, Adele Lawthom, Charlotte Price, Martine Blyth, Christopher Jones, Carys Mc Laughlin, Leah Noyes, Jane |
author_facet | Roberts, Gareth Cahill, Adele Lawthom, Charlotte Price, Martine Blyth, Christopher Jones, Carys Mc Laughlin, Leah Noyes, Jane |
author_sort | Roberts, Gareth |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: There is growing recognition that in order to remain sustainable, the UK’s National Health Service must deliver the best patient outcomes within available resources. This focus on outcomes relative to cost is the basis of value-based healthcare (VBHC) and has led to interest in the recording of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to measure patient perspectives on the impact of a health condition on their lives. Every health board in Wales is now required to collect PROMS as part of routine care. We will evaluate the VBHC programme implemented in a lead health board. The study aim is to understand what works about PROMs collection, for whom, in what contexts and why in a VBHC context. In addition, we will assess the social value of integrating PROMs collection into routine care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A three-stage mixed-methods study comprising a realist evaluation integrated with social return on investment (SROI) analysis across four conditions; Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy, heart failure and cataract surgery. Workstream 1: Development of logic models, informed by a scoping review, documentary analysis, patient and public involvement (PPI), staff and key stakeholder engagement. Workstream 2: Realist evaluation building on multiple data sources from stages 1 to 3 to test and refine the programme theories that arise from the logic model development. Workstream 3: SROI analysis using interview data with patients, staff and carers, stakeholder and PPI engagement, anonymised routinely collected data, and questionnaires to populate a model that will explore the social value generated by the implementation of PROMs. Findings across stages will be validated with key stakeholders. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by Wales Research Ethics Committee #5 (22/WA/0044). Outcomes will be shared with key stakeholders, published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) licence, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build on this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10151973 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101519732023-05-03 Protocol for a realist and social return on investment evaluation of the use of patient-reported outcomes in four value-based healthcare programmes Roberts, Gareth Cahill, Adele Lawthom, Charlotte Price, Martine Blyth, Christopher Jones, Carys Mc Laughlin, Leah Noyes, Jane BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: There is growing recognition that in order to remain sustainable, the UK’s National Health Service must deliver the best patient outcomes within available resources. This focus on outcomes relative to cost is the basis of value-based healthcare (VBHC) and has led to interest in the recording of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to measure patient perspectives on the impact of a health condition on their lives. Every health board in Wales is now required to collect PROMS as part of routine care. We will evaluate the VBHC programme implemented in a lead health board. The study aim is to understand what works about PROMs collection, for whom, in what contexts and why in a VBHC context. In addition, we will assess the social value of integrating PROMs collection into routine care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A three-stage mixed-methods study comprising a realist evaluation integrated with social return on investment (SROI) analysis across four conditions; Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy, heart failure and cataract surgery. Workstream 1: Development of logic models, informed by a scoping review, documentary analysis, patient and public involvement (PPI), staff and key stakeholder engagement. Workstream 2: Realist evaluation building on multiple data sources from stages 1 to 3 to test and refine the programme theories that arise from the logic model development. Workstream 3: SROI analysis using interview data with patients, staff and carers, stakeholder and PPI engagement, anonymised routinely collected data, and questionnaires to populate a model that will explore the social value generated by the implementation of PROMs. Findings across stages will be validated with key stakeholders. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by Wales Research Ethics Committee #5 (22/WA/0044). Outcomes will be shared with key stakeholders, published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) licence, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build on this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC10151973/ /pubmed/37105686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072234 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Health Services Research Roberts, Gareth Cahill, Adele Lawthom, Charlotte Price, Martine Blyth, Christopher Jones, Carys Mc Laughlin, Leah Noyes, Jane Protocol for a realist and social return on investment evaluation of the use of patient-reported outcomes in four value-based healthcare programmes |
title | Protocol for a realist and social return on investment evaluation of the use of patient-reported outcomes in four value-based healthcare programmes |
title_full | Protocol for a realist and social return on investment evaluation of the use of patient-reported outcomes in four value-based healthcare programmes |
title_fullStr | Protocol for a realist and social return on investment evaluation of the use of patient-reported outcomes in four value-based healthcare programmes |
title_full_unstemmed | Protocol for a realist and social return on investment evaluation of the use of patient-reported outcomes in four value-based healthcare programmes |
title_short | Protocol for a realist and social return on investment evaluation of the use of patient-reported outcomes in four value-based healthcare programmes |
title_sort | protocol for a realist and social return on investment evaluation of the use of patient-reported outcomes in four value-based healthcare programmes |
topic | Health Services Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10151973/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37105686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072234 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT robertsgareth protocolforarealistandsocialreturnoninvestmentevaluationoftheuseofpatientreportedoutcomesinfourvaluebasedhealthcareprogrammes AT cahilladele protocolforarealistandsocialreturnoninvestmentevaluationoftheuseofpatientreportedoutcomesinfourvaluebasedhealthcareprogrammes AT lawthomcharlotte protocolforarealistandsocialreturnoninvestmentevaluationoftheuseofpatientreportedoutcomesinfourvaluebasedhealthcareprogrammes AT pricemartine protocolforarealistandsocialreturnoninvestmentevaluationoftheuseofpatientreportedoutcomesinfourvaluebasedhealthcareprogrammes AT blythchristopher protocolforarealistandsocialreturnoninvestmentevaluationoftheuseofpatientreportedoutcomesinfourvaluebasedhealthcareprogrammes AT jonescarys protocolforarealistandsocialreturnoninvestmentevaluationoftheuseofpatientreportedoutcomesinfourvaluebasedhealthcareprogrammes AT mclaughlinleah protocolforarealistandsocialreturnoninvestmentevaluationoftheuseofpatientreportedoutcomesinfourvaluebasedhealthcareprogrammes AT noyesjane protocolforarealistandsocialreturnoninvestmentevaluationoftheuseofpatientreportedoutcomesinfourvaluebasedhealthcareprogrammes |