Cargando…
Performance of the 2022 ACR/EULAR giant cell arteritis classification criteria for diagnosis in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis in routine clinical care
OBJECTIVE: To examine the performance of the new 2022 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/EULAR giant cell arteritis (GCA) classification criteria for diagnosis in routine clinical care. METHODS: Multicentric retrospective observational study of patients referred to two ultrasound (US) fast track...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10151996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37094980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002970 |
_version_ | 1785035660493586432 |
---|---|
author | Molina-Collada, Juan Castrejón, Isabel Monjo, Irene Fernández-Fernández, Elisa Torres Ortiz, Gabriela Álvaro-Gracia, Jose María de Miguel, Eugenio |
author_facet | Molina-Collada, Juan Castrejón, Isabel Monjo, Irene Fernández-Fernández, Elisa Torres Ortiz, Gabriela Álvaro-Gracia, Jose María de Miguel, Eugenio |
author_sort | Molina-Collada, Juan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To examine the performance of the new 2022 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/EULAR giant cell arteritis (GCA) classification criteria for diagnosis in routine clinical care. METHODS: Multicentric retrospective observational study of patients referred to two ultrasound (US) fast track clinics. Patients with GCA were compared with unselected controls with suspected GCA. The gold standard for GCA diagnosis has been clinical confirmation after 6 months of follow-up. All patients underwent an US exam of temporal and extracranial arteries (carotid, subclavian and axillary) at baseline. Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/CT was performed according to standard clinician criteria. The performance of the new 2022 ACR/EULAR GCA classification criteria was evaluated in all patients with GCA across different subsets of the disease. RESULTS: A total of 319 patients (188 cases, 131 controls) were included for analysis (mean age 76 years, 58.9% females). Overall, the 2022 EULAR/ACR GCA classification criteria had a sensitivity of 92.6% and a specificity of 71.8%, using GCA clinical diagnosis as external criterion and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.928 (95% CI 0.899 to 0.957). Isolated large vessel-GCA showed a sensitivity of 62.2% and a specificity of 71.8% (AUC 0.691 (0.592 to 0.790)), while biopsy‐proven GCA showed a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 71.8% (AUC 0.989 (0.976 to 1)). Overall sensitivity and specificity of the 1990 ACR criteria was 53.2% and 80.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The new 2022 ACR/EULAR GCA classification criteria showed adequate diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected GCA under routine care, and an improvement on the sensitivity and specificity of the 1990 ACR classification criteria in all patient subsets. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10151996 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101519962023-05-03 Performance of the 2022 ACR/EULAR giant cell arteritis classification criteria for diagnosis in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis in routine clinical care Molina-Collada, Juan Castrejón, Isabel Monjo, Irene Fernández-Fernández, Elisa Torres Ortiz, Gabriela Álvaro-Gracia, Jose María de Miguel, Eugenio RMD Open Vasculitis OBJECTIVE: To examine the performance of the new 2022 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/EULAR giant cell arteritis (GCA) classification criteria for diagnosis in routine clinical care. METHODS: Multicentric retrospective observational study of patients referred to two ultrasound (US) fast track clinics. Patients with GCA were compared with unselected controls with suspected GCA. The gold standard for GCA diagnosis has been clinical confirmation after 6 months of follow-up. All patients underwent an US exam of temporal and extracranial arteries (carotid, subclavian and axillary) at baseline. Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/CT was performed according to standard clinician criteria. The performance of the new 2022 ACR/EULAR GCA classification criteria was evaluated in all patients with GCA across different subsets of the disease. RESULTS: A total of 319 patients (188 cases, 131 controls) were included for analysis (mean age 76 years, 58.9% females). Overall, the 2022 EULAR/ACR GCA classification criteria had a sensitivity of 92.6% and a specificity of 71.8%, using GCA clinical diagnosis as external criterion and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.928 (95% CI 0.899 to 0.957). Isolated large vessel-GCA showed a sensitivity of 62.2% and a specificity of 71.8% (AUC 0.691 (0.592 to 0.790)), while biopsy‐proven GCA showed a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 71.8% (AUC 0.989 (0.976 to 1)). Overall sensitivity and specificity of the 1990 ACR criteria was 53.2% and 80.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The new 2022 ACR/EULAR GCA classification criteria showed adequate diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected GCA under routine care, and an improvement on the sensitivity and specificity of the 1990 ACR classification criteria in all patient subsets. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10151996/ /pubmed/37094980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002970 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Vasculitis Molina-Collada, Juan Castrejón, Isabel Monjo, Irene Fernández-Fernández, Elisa Torres Ortiz, Gabriela Álvaro-Gracia, Jose María de Miguel, Eugenio Performance of the 2022 ACR/EULAR giant cell arteritis classification criteria for diagnosis in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis in routine clinical care |
title | Performance of the 2022 ACR/EULAR giant cell arteritis classification criteria for diagnosis in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis in routine clinical care |
title_full | Performance of the 2022 ACR/EULAR giant cell arteritis classification criteria for diagnosis in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis in routine clinical care |
title_fullStr | Performance of the 2022 ACR/EULAR giant cell arteritis classification criteria for diagnosis in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis in routine clinical care |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of the 2022 ACR/EULAR giant cell arteritis classification criteria for diagnosis in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis in routine clinical care |
title_short | Performance of the 2022 ACR/EULAR giant cell arteritis classification criteria for diagnosis in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis in routine clinical care |
title_sort | performance of the 2022 acr/eular giant cell arteritis classification criteria for diagnosis in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis in routine clinical care |
topic | Vasculitis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10151996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37094980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002970 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT molinacolladajuan performanceofthe2022acreulargiantcellarteritisclassificationcriteriafordiagnosisinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritisinroutineclinicalcare AT castrejonisabel performanceofthe2022acreulargiantcellarteritisclassificationcriteriafordiagnosisinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritisinroutineclinicalcare AT monjoirene performanceofthe2022acreulargiantcellarteritisclassificationcriteriafordiagnosisinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritisinroutineclinicalcare AT fernandezfernandezelisa performanceofthe2022acreulargiantcellarteritisclassificationcriteriafordiagnosisinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritisinroutineclinicalcare AT torresortizgabriela performanceofthe2022acreulargiantcellarteritisclassificationcriteriafordiagnosisinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritisinroutineclinicalcare AT alvarograciajosemaria performanceofthe2022acreulargiantcellarteritisclassificationcriteriafordiagnosisinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritisinroutineclinicalcare AT demigueleugenio performanceofthe2022acreulargiantcellarteritisclassificationcriteriafordiagnosisinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritisinroutineclinicalcare |