Cargando…

Performance of the 2022 ACR/EULAR giant cell arteritis classification criteria for diagnosis in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis in routine clinical care

OBJECTIVE: To examine the performance of the new 2022 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/EULAR giant cell arteritis (GCA) classification criteria for diagnosis in routine clinical care. METHODS: Multicentric retrospective observational study of patients referred to two ultrasound (US) fast track...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Molina-Collada, Juan, Castrejón, Isabel, Monjo, Irene, Fernández-Fernández, Elisa, Torres Ortiz, Gabriela, Álvaro-Gracia, Jose María, de Miguel, Eugenio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10151996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37094980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002970
_version_ 1785035660493586432
author Molina-Collada, Juan
Castrejón, Isabel
Monjo, Irene
Fernández-Fernández, Elisa
Torres Ortiz, Gabriela
Álvaro-Gracia, Jose María
de Miguel, Eugenio
author_facet Molina-Collada, Juan
Castrejón, Isabel
Monjo, Irene
Fernández-Fernández, Elisa
Torres Ortiz, Gabriela
Álvaro-Gracia, Jose María
de Miguel, Eugenio
author_sort Molina-Collada, Juan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To examine the performance of the new 2022 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/EULAR giant cell arteritis (GCA) classification criteria for diagnosis in routine clinical care. METHODS: Multicentric retrospective observational study of patients referred to two ultrasound (US) fast track clinics. Patients with GCA were compared with unselected controls with suspected GCA. The gold standard for GCA diagnosis has been clinical confirmation after 6 months of follow-up. All patients underwent an US exam of temporal and extracranial arteries (carotid, subclavian and axillary) at baseline. Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/CT was performed according to standard clinician criteria. The performance of the new 2022 ACR/EULAR GCA classification criteria was evaluated in all patients with GCA across different subsets of the disease. RESULTS: A total of 319 patients (188 cases, 131 controls) were included for analysis (mean age 76 years, 58.9% females). Overall, the 2022 EULAR/ACR GCA classification criteria had a sensitivity of 92.6% and a specificity of 71.8%, using GCA clinical diagnosis as external criterion and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.928 (95% CI 0.899 to 0.957). Isolated large vessel-GCA showed a sensitivity of 62.2% and a specificity of 71.8% (AUC 0.691 (0.592 to 0.790)), while biopsy‐proven GCA showed a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 71.8% (AUC 0.989 (0.976 to 1)). Overall sensitivity and specificity of the 1990 ACR criteria was 53.2% and 80.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The new 2022 ACR/EULAR GCA classification criteria showed adequate diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected GCA under routine care, and an improvement on the sensitivity and specificity of the 1990 ACR classification criteria in all patient subsets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10151996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101519962023-05-03 Performance of the 2022 ACR/EULAR giant cell arteritis classification criteria for diagnosis in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis in routine clinical care Molina-Collada, Juan Castrejón, Isabel Monjo, Irene Fernández-Fernández, Elisa Torres Ortiz, Gabriela Álvaro-Gracia, Jose María de Miguel, Eugenio RMD Open Vasculitis OBJECTIVE: To examine the performance of the new 2022 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/EULAR giant cell arteritis (GCA) classification criteria for diagnosis in routine clinical care. METHODS: Multicentric retrospective observational study of patients referred to two ultrasound (US) fast track clinics. Patients with GCA were compared with unselected controls with suspected GCA. The gold standard for GCA diagnosis has been clinical confirmation after 6 months of follow-up. All patients underwent an US exam of temporal and extracranial arteries (carotid, subclavian and axillary) at baseline. Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/CT was performed according to standard clinician criteria. The performance of the new 2022 ACR/EULAR GCA classification criteria was evaluated in all patients with GCA across different subsets of the disease. RESULTS: A total of 319 patients (188 cases, 131 controls) were included for analysis (mean age 76 years, 58.9% females). Overall, the 2022 EULAR/ACR GCA classification criteria had a sensitivity of 92.6% and a specificity of 71.8%, using GCA clinical diagnosis as external criterion and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.928 (95% CI 0.899 to 0.957). Isolated large vessel-GCA showed a sensitivity of 62.2% and a specificity of 71.8% (AUC 0.691 (0.592 to 0.790)), while biopsy‐proven GCA showed a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 71.8% (AUC 0.989 (0.976 to 1)). Overall sensitivity and specificity of the 1990 ACR criteria was 53.2% and 80.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The new 2022 ACR/EULAR GCA classification criteria showed adequate diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected GCA under routine care, and an improvement on the sensitivity and specificity of the 1990 ACR classification criteria in all patient subsets. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10151996/ /pubmed/37094980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002970 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Vasculitis
Molina-Collada, Juan
Castrejón, Isabel
Monjo, Irene
Fernández-Fernández, Elisa
Torres Ortiz, Gabriela
Álvaro-Gracia, Jose María
de Miguel, Eugenio
Performance of the 2022 ACR/EULAR giant cell arteritis classification criteria for diagnosis in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis in routine clinical care
title Performance of the 2022 ACR/EULAR giant cell arteritis classification criteria for diagnosis in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis in routine clinical care
title_full Performance of the 2022 ACR/EULAR giant cell arteritis classification criteria for diagnosis in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis in routine clinical care
title_fullStr Performance of the 2022 ACR/EULAR giant cell arteritis classification criteria for diagnosis in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis in routine clinical care
title_full_unstemmed Performance of the 2022 ACR/EULAR giant cell arteritis classification criteria for diagnosis in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis in routine clinical care
title_short Performance of the 2022 ACR/EULAR giant cell arteritis classification criteria for diagnosis in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis in routine clinical care
title_sort performance of the 2022 acr/eular giant cell arteritis classification criteria for diagnosis in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis in routine clinical care
topic Vasculitis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10151996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37094980
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002970
work_keys_str_mv AT molinacolladajuan performanceofthe2022acreulargiantcellarteritisclassificationcriteriafordiagnosisinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritisinroutineclinicalcare
AT castrejonisabel performanceofthe2022acreulargiantcellarteritisclassificationcriteriafordiagnosisinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritisinroutineclinicalcare
AT monjoirene performanceofthe2022acreulargiantcellarteritisclassificationcriteriafordiagnosisinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritisinroutineclinicalcare
AT fernandezfernandezelisa performanceofthe2022acreulargiantcellarteritisclassificationcriteriafordiagnosisinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritisinroutineclinicalcare
AT torresortizgabriela performanceofthe2022acreulargiantcellarteritisclassificationcriteriafordiagnosisinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritisinroutineclinicalcare
AT alvarograciajosemaria performanceofthe2022acreulargiantcellarteritisclassificationcriteriafordiagnosisinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritisinroutineclinicalcare
AT demigueleugenio performanceofthe2022acreulargiantcellarteritisclassificationcriteriafordiagnosisinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritisinroutineclinicalcare