Cargando…

Variations in current clinical practice of postoperative pericardial effusion: a questionnaire study

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative pericardial effusion (PPE) occurs frequently after cardiac surgery, potentially leading to life-threatening cardiac tamponade. Specific treatment guidelines are currently lacking, possibly leading to variations in clinical practice. Our goal was to assess clinical PPE manage...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Dinter, Stefan, Li, Wilson, Wollersheim, Laurens, Rodwell, Laura, van Royen, Niels, Dieker, Hendrik-Jan, Verhagen, Ad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10152046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37094990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2023-002271
_version_ 1785035672069865472
author van Dinter, Stefan
Li, Wilson
Wollersheim, Laurens
Rodwell, Laura
van Royen, Niels
Dieker, Hendrik-Jan
Verhagen, Ad
author_facet van Dinter, Stefan
Li, Wilson
Wollersheim, Laurens
Rodwell, Laura
van Royen, Niels
Dieker, Hendrik-Jan
Verhagen, Ad
author_sort van Dinter, Stefan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Postoperative pericardial effusion (PPE) occurs frequently after cardiac surgery, potentially leading to life-threatening cardiac tamponade. Specific treatment guidelines are currently lacking, possibly leading to variations in clinical practice. Our goal was to assess clinical PPE management and evaluate variation between centres and clinicians. METHODS: A nationwide survey was sent to all interventional cardiologists and cardiothoracic surgeons in the Netherlands, regarding their preferred diagnostic and treatment modality of PPE. Clinical preferences were explored utilising four patient scenarios, each with a high/low echocardiographic and clinical suspicion of cardiac tamponade. Scenarios were also stratified by three PPE sizes (<1 cm, 1–2 cm, >2 cm). RESULTS: In total, 46/140 interventional cardiologists and 48/120 cardiothoracic surgeons responded (27/31 contacted centres). Cardiologists favoured routine postoperative echocardiography in all patients (44%), whereas cardiothoracic surgeons preferred routine imaging after specific procedures, especially mitral (85%) and tricuspid (79%) valve surgery. Overall, pericardiocentesis (83%) was preferred over surgical evacuation (17%). Regarding all patient scenarios, cardiothoracic surgeons significantly preferred evacuation compared with cardiologists (51% vs 37%, p<0.001). This was also observed with cardiologists employed in surgical centres compared with non-surgical centres (43% vs 31%, p=0.02). Inter-rater analysis varied from poor to near-excellent (к 0.22–0.67), suggesting varying PPE treatment preferences within one centre. CONCLUSION: There is significant variation in the preferred management of PPE between hospitals and clinicians, even within the same centre, possibly due to the lack of specific guidelines. Therefore, robust results of a systematic approach to PPE diagnosis and treatment are needed to formulate evidence-based recommendations and optimise patient outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10152046
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101520462023-05-03 Variations in current clinical practice of postoperative pericardial effusion: a questionnaire study van Dinter, Stefan Li, Wilson Wollersheim, Laurens Rodwell, Laura van Royen, Niels Dieker, Hendrik-Jan Verhagen, Ad Open Heart Cardiac Surgery OBJECTIVE: Postoperative pericardial effusion (PPE) occurs frequently after cardiac surgery, potentially leading to life-threatening cardiac tamponade. Specific treatment guidelines are currently lacking, possibly leading to variations in clinical practice. Our goal was to assess clinical PPE management and evaluate variation between centres and clinicians. METHODS: A nationwide survey was sent to all interventional cardiologists and cardiothoracic surgeons in the Netherlands, regarding their preferred diagnostic and treatment modality of PPE. Clinical preferences were explored utilising four patient scenarios, each with a high/low echocardiographic and clinical suspicion of cardiac tamponade. Scenarios were also stratified by three PPE sizes (<1 cm, 1–2 cm, >2 cm). RESULTS: In total, 46/140 interventional cardiologists and 48/120 cardiothoracic surgeons responded (27/31 contacted centres). Cardiologists favoured routine postoperative echocardiography in all patients (44%), whereas cardiothoracic surgeons preferred routine imaging after specific procedures, especially mitral (85%) and tricuspid (79%) valve surgery. Overall, pericardiocentesis (83%) was preferred over surgical evacuation (17%). Regarding all patient scenarios, cardiothoracic surgeons significantly preferred evacuation compared with cardiologists (51% vs 37%, p<0.001). This was also observed with cardiologists employed in surgical centres compared with non-surgical centres (43% vs 31%, p=0.02). Inter-rater analysis varied from poor to near-excellent (к 0.22–0.67), suggesting varying PPE treatment preferences within one centre. CONCLUSION: There is significant variation in the preferred management of PPE between hospitals and clinicians, even within the same centre, possibly due to the lack of specific guidelines. Therefore, robust results of a systematic approach to PPE diagnosis and treatment are needed to formulate evidence-based recommendations and optimise patient outcome. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10152046/ /pubmed/37094990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2023-002271 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Cardiac Surgery
van Dinter, Stefan
Li, Wilson
Wollersheim, Laurens
Rodwell, Laura
van Royen, Niels
Dieker, Hendrik-Jan
Verhagen, Ad
Variations in current clinical practice of postoperative pericardial effusion: a questionnaire study
title Variations in current clinical practice of postoperative pericardial effusion: a questionnaire study
title_full Variations in current clinical practice of postoperative pericardial effusion: a questionnaire study
title_fullStr Variations in current clinical practice of postoperative pericardial effusion: a questionnaire study
title_full_unstemmed Variations in current clinical practice of postoperative pericardial effusion: a questionnaire study
title_short Variations in current clinical practice of postoperative pericardial effusion: a questionnaire study
title_sort variations in current clinical practice of postoperative pericardial effusion: a questionnaire study
topic Cardiac Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10152046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37094990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2023-002271
work_keys_str_mv AT vandinterstefan variationsincurrentclinicalpracticeofpostoperativepericardialeffusionaquestionnairestudy
AT liwilson variationsincurrentclinicalpracticeofpostoperativepericardialeffusionaquestionnairestudy
AT wollersheimlaurens variationsincurrentclinicalpracticeofpostoperativepericardialeffusionaquestionnairestudy
AT rodwelllaura variationsincurrentclinicalpracticeofpostoperativepericardialeffusionaquestionnairestudy
AT vanroyenniels variationsincurrentclinicalpracticeofpostoperativepericardialeffusionaquestionnairestudy
AT diekerhendrikjan variationsincurrentclinicalpracticeofpostoperativepericardialeffusionaquestionnairestudy
AT verhagenad variationsincurrentclinicalpracticeofpostoperativepericardialeffusionaquestionnairestudy