Cargando…

Impact of initial therapy with upadacitinib or adalimumab on achievement of 48-week treatment goals in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: post hoc analysis of SELECT-COMPARE

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the importance of treatment sequencing in SELECT-COMPARE, assessing potential differences between starting upadacitinib or adalimumab therapy following inadequate MTX response. METHODS: Patients from SELECT-COMPARE were randomized to upadacitinib 15 mg once daily, placebo or ada...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mysler, Eduardo, Tanaka, Yoshiya, Kavanaugh, Arthur, Aletaha, Daniel, Taylor, Peter C, Song, In-Ho, Shaw, Tim, Song, Yanna, DeMasi, Ryan, Ali, Mira, Fleischmann, Roy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10152292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36018230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keac477
_version_ 1785035721250177024
author Mysler, Eduardo
Tanaka, Yoshiya
Kavanaugh, Arthur
Aletaha, Daniel
Taylor, Peter C
Song, In-Ho
Shaw, Tim
Song, Yanna
DeMasi, Ryan
Ali, Mira
Fleischmann, Roy
author_facet Mysler, Eduardo
Tanaka, Yoshiya
Kavanaugh, Arthur
Aletaha, Daniel
Taylor, Peter C
Song, In-Ho
Shaw, Tim
Song, Yanna
DeMasi, Ryan
Ali, Mira
Fleischmann, Roy
author_sort Mysler, Eduardo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the importance of treatment sequencing in SELECT-COMPARE, assessing potential differences between starting upadacitinib or adalimumab therapy following inadequate MTX response. METHODS: Patients from SELECT-COMPARE were randomized to upadacitinib 15 mg once daily, placebo or adalimumab 40 mg. Per protocol, patients with <20% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts (weeks 14, 18, 22) or failure to achieve Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) low disease activity (LDA) at week 26 were blindly switched from upadacitinib to adalimumab or vice versa. Treatment outcomes, including clinical remission/LDA, physical function, pain and a novel combined endpoint for deep response, were evaluated through 48 weeks and corresponding time-averaged response rates determined. Data were analysed by initial randomized group regardless of any subsequent switch in therapy. RESULTS: This post hoc analysis included 651 patients initially randomized to upadacitinib (of whom 252 switched to adalimumab) and 327 patients initially randomized to adalimumab (of whom 159 switched to upadacitinib). At week 48, patients randomized to either therapy demonstrated similar achievement of most treatment endpoints. Greater improvements in the total time spent in a lower disease state were observed for initial upadacitinib vs initial adalimumab therapy across most clinical and patient-reported outcomes through 48 weeks, and the median time to DAS28(CRP) <2.6/≤3.2 occurred 6–8 weeks earlier among those randomized to upadacitinib. CONCLUSION: Following a modified treat-to-target strategy, rates of CDAI remission/LDA and DAS28(CRP) <2.6/≤3.2 at 48 weeks were similar, regardless of starting therapy. However, patients initially receiving upadacitinib reached treatment targets more quickly and spent more time in clinical targets over the initial 48 weeks of treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02629159
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10152292
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-101522922023-05-03 Impact of initial therapy with upadacitinib or adalimumab on achievement of 48-week treatment goals in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: post hoc analysis of SELECT-COMPARE Mysler, Eduardo Tanaka, Yoshiya Kavanaugh, Arthur Aletaha, Daniel Taylor, Peter C Song, In-Ho Shaw, Tim Song, Yanna DeMasi, Ryan Ali, Mira Fleischmann, Roy Rheumatology (Oxford) Clinical Science OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the importance of treatment sequencing in SELECT-COMPARE, assessing potential differences between starting upadacitinib or adalimumab therapy following inadequate MTX response. METHODS: Patients from SELECT-COMPARE were randomized to upadacitinib 15 mg once daily, placebo or adalimumab 40 mg. Per protocol, patients with <20% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts (weeks 14, 18, 22) or failure to achieve Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) low disease activity (LDA) at week 26 were blindly switched from upadacitinib to adalimumab or vice versa. Treatment outcomes, including clinical remission/LDA, physical function, pain and a novel combined endpoint for deep response, were evaluated through 48 weeks and corresponding time-averaged response rates determined. Data were analysed by initial randomized group regardless of any subsequent switch in therapy. RESULTS: This post hoc analysis included 651 patients initially randomized to upadacitinib (of whom 252 switched to adalimumab) and 327 patients initially randomized to adalimumab (of whom 159 switched to upadacitinib). At week 48, patients randomized to either therapy demonstrated similar achievement of most treatment endpoints. Greater improvements in the total time spent in a lower disease state were observed for initial upadacitinib vs initial adalimumab therapy across most clinical and patient-reported outcomes through 48 weeks, and the median time to DAS28(CRP) <2.6/≤3.2 occurred 6–8 weeks earlier among those randomized to upadacitinib. CONCLUSION: Following a modified treat-to-target strategy, rates of CDAI remission/LDA and DAS28(CRP) <2.6/≤3.2 at 48 weeks were similar, regardless of starting therapy. However, patients initially receiving upadacitinib reached treatment targets more quickly and spent more time in clinical targets over the initial 48 weeks of treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02629159 Oxford University Press 2022-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC10152292/ /pubmed/36018230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keac477 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Clinical Science
Mysler, Eduardo
Tanaka, Yoshiya
Kavanaugh, Arthur
Aletaha, Daniel
Taylor, Peter C
Song, In-Ho
Shaw, Tim
Song, Yanna
DeMasi, Ryan
Ali, Mira
Fleischmann, Roy
Impact of initial therapy with upadacitinib or adalimumab on achievement of 48-week treatment goals in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: post hoc analysis of SELECT-COMPARE
title Impact of initial therapy with upadacitinib or adalimumab on achievement of 48-week treatment goals in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: post hoc analysis of SELECT-COMPARE
title_full Impact of initial therapy with upadacitinib or adalimumab on achievement of 48-week treatment goals in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: post hoc analysis of SELECT-COMPARE
title_fullStr Impact of initial therapy with upadacitinib or adalimumab on achievement of 48-week treatment goals in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: post hoc analysis of SELECT-COMPARE
title_full_unstemmed Impact of initial therapy with upadacitinib or adalimumab on achievement of 48-week treatment goals in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: post hoc analysis of SELECT-COMPARE
title_short Impact of initial therapy with upadacitinib or adalimumab on achievement of 48-week treatment goals in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: post hoc analysis of SELECT-COMPARE
title_sort impact of initial therapy with upadacitinib or adalimumab on achievement of 48-week treatment goals in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: post hoc analysis of select-compare
topic Clinical Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10152292/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36018230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keac477
work_keys_str_mv AT myslereduardo impactofinitialtherapywithupadacitiniboradalimumabonachievementof48weektreatmentgoalsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisposthocanalysisofselectcompare
AT tanakayoshiya impactofinitialtherapywithupadacitiniboradalimumabonachievementof48weektreatmentgoalsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisposthocanalysisofselectcompare
AT kavanaugharthur impactofinitialtherapywithupadacitiniboradalimumabonachievementof48weektreatmentgoalsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisposthocanalysisofselectcompare
AT aletahadaniel impactofinitialtherapywithupadacitiniboradalimumabonachievementof48weektreatmentgoalsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisposthocanalysisofselectcompare
AT taylorpeterc impactofinitialtherapywithupadacitiniboradalimumabonachievementof48weektreatmentgoalsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisposthocanalysisofselectcompare
AT songinho impactofinitialtherapywithupadacitiniboradalimumabonachievementof48weektreatmentgoalsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisposthocanalysisofselectcompare
AT shawtim impactofinitialtherapywithupadacitiniboradalimumabonachievementof48weektreatmentgoalsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisposthocanalysisofselectcompare
AT songyanna impactofinitialtherapywithupadacitiniboradalimumabonachievementof48weektreatmentgoalsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisposthocanalysisofselectcompare
AT demasiryan impactofinitialtherapywithupadacitiniboradalimumabonachievementof48weektreatmentgoalsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisposthocanalysisofselectcompare
AT alimira impactofinitialtherapywithupadacitiniboradalimumabonachievementof48weektreatmentgoalsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisposthocanalysisofselectcompare
AT fleischmannroy impactofinitialtherapywithupadacitiniboradalimumabonachievementof48weektreatmentgoalsinpatientswithrheumatoidarthritisposthocanalysisofselectcompare