Cargando…
Research note reliability and validity of Japanese version of the trauma-informed care provider survey (TIC provider survey)
OBJECTIVE: Robust instruments to evaluate the ability of trauma-informed care among healthcare workers need to be developed, as this would help the implementation of trauma-informed care to prevent re-traumatization of patients. This study aims to assess the reliability and validity of the Japanese...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10152421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37131236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-023-06337-8 |
_version_ | 1785035747103866880 |
---|---|
author | Kataoka, Mayumi Kotake, Risa Asaoka, Hiroki Miyamoto, Yuki Nishi, Daisuke |
author_facet | Kataoka, Mayumi Kotake, Risa Asaoka, Hiroki Miyamoto, Yuki Nishi, Daisuke |
author_sort | Kataoka, Mayumi |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Robust instruments to evaluate the ability of trauma-informed care among healthcare workers need to be developed, as this would help the implementation of trauma-informed care to prevent re-traumatization of patients. This study aims to assess the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Trauma-Informed Care (TIC) Provider Survey. A total of 794 healthcare workers were surveyed using a self-administered questionnaire, including the TIC Provider Survey, and six measures that were considered to be correlated with it. We calculated the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient to investigate the internal consistency of each category of the TIC Provider Survey (knowledge, opinions, self-rated competence, practices, and barriers). Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients were used to investigate the correlation between each category of the TIC Provider Survey, and other measures of construct validity. RESULTS: Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of each category of the TIC Provider Survey were 0.40 (Knowledge), 0.63 (Opinions), 0.92 (Self-rated competence), 0.93 (Practices), and 0.87 (Barriers). The Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients were small. We confirmed the reliability of the acceptable levels and examined the validity of modest or unacceptable levels of the Japanese version of the TIC provider survey among Japanese workers in a healthcare setting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13104-023-06337-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10152421 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-101524212023-05-03 Research note reliability and validity of Japanese version of the trauma-informed care provider survey (TIC provider survey) Kataoka, Mayumi Kotake, Risa Asaoka, Hiroki Miyamoto, Yuki Nishi, Daisuke BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVE: Robust instruments to evaluate the ability of trauma-informed care among healthcare workers need to be developed, as this would help the implementation of trauma-informed care to prevent re-traumatization of patients. This study aims to assess the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Trauma-Informed Care (TIC) Provider Survey. A total of 794 healthcare workers were surveyed using a self-administered questionnaire, including the TIC Provider Survey, and six measures that were considered to be correlated with it. We calculated the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient to investigate the internal consistency of each category of the TIC Provider Survey (knowledge, opinions, self-rated competence, practices, and barriers). Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients were used to investigate the correlation between each category of the TIC Provider Survey, and other measures of construct validity. RESULTS: Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of each category of the TIC Provider Survey were 0.40 (Knowledge), 0.63 (Opinions), 0.92 (Self-rated competence), 0.93 (Practices), and 0.87 (Barriers). The Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients were small. We confirmed the reliability of the acceptable levels and examined the validity of modest or unacceptable levels of the Japanese version of the TIC provider survey among Japanese workers in a healthcare setting. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13104-023-06337-8. BioMed Central 2023-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10152421/ /pubmed/37131236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-023-06337-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Note Kataoka, Mayumi Kotake, Risa Asaoka, Hiroki Miyamoto, Yuki Nishi, Daisuke Research note reliability and validity of Japanese version of the trauma-informed care provider survey (TIC provider survey) |
title | Research note reliability and validity of Japanese version of the trauma-informed care provider survey (TIC provider survey) |
title_full | Research note reliability and validity of Japanese version of the trauma-informed care provider survey (TIC provider survey) |
title_fullStr | Research note reliability and validity of Japanese version of the trauma-informed care provider survey (TIC provider survey) |
title_full_unstemmed | Research note reliability and validity of Japanese version of the trauma-informed care provider survey (TIC provider survey) |
title_short | Research note reliability and validity of Japanese version of the trauma-informed care provider survey (TIC provider survey) |
title_sort | research note reliability and validity of japanese version of the trauma-informed care provider survey (tic provider survey) |
topic | Research Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10152421/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37131236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-023-06337-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kataokamayumi researchnotereliabilityandvalidityofjapaneseversionofthetraumainformedcareprovidersurveyticprovidersurvey AT kotakerisa researchnotereliabilityandvalidityofjapaneseversionofthetraumainformedcareprovidersurveyticprovidersurvey AT asaokahiroki researchnotereliabilityandvalidityofjapaneseversionofthetraumainformedcareprovidersurveyticprovidersurvey AT miyamotoyuki researchnotereliabilityandvalidityofjapaneseversionofthetraumainformedcareprovidersurveyticprovidersurvey AT nishidaisuke researchnotereliabilityandvalidityofjapaneseversionofthetraumainformedcareprovidersurveyticprovidersurvey |